Shut down Anonyboards

[Sabb]

I've never been, nor even know of a method to getting to the anony boards and don't care to know. Things shouldn't be said behind backs and they definitely shouldn't be put in a rude manner on the anony boards. You shouldn't use the board as a way of being a douche without repercussion. As a means of identifying an issue IN A NICE WAY it seems fine to me or a better purpose to talk about your opinions without fear of prejudice and judgement. What was said about purples work regardless of opinion was a tad bit unnecessary. That's an issue that has already been visited here and if you've got something to say there's a topic for an argument about it HERE. If you're gonna be a douche about it why don't you do it here, so then we can criticize you for your poor people skills an inability to accept a fact that has already been laid out. They really don't need to be shut down though. I'll probably never enter that active flame war of anonymous posts, people just need to learn that if you've got a problem with someone you can make that clear to them without being a total asshole all the while hiding behind the fact that your post is anonymous.

http://ab.randomgs.com/
Just in case you want to know what everyone's talking talking about fully and shit.

[Shockah]

http://ab.randomgs.com/
Just in case you want to know what everyone's talking talking about fully and shit.

Spent about a whole 5 minutes looking around, lost all faith in humanity. I don't feel the need to explain why, if you can't figure it out for yourself I'll sum it up with this statement, "The immaturity present in some members of this community is larger then that which is present in my 7 year old autistic cousin".

[Frank]

Spent about a whole 5 minutes looking around, lost all faith in humanity. I don't feel the need to explain why, if you can't figure it out for yourself I'll sum it up with this statement, "The immaturity present in some members of this community is larger then that which is present in my 7 year old autistic cousin".

>Go to an anonymous board frequented by less than 40 people
>"zomgs1!1111 humanity is hurrible!! omggg"

[Samo]

Holy shit. I just had a look over the whole Anonyboards. And the amount of braindeads on it is really something... All they do is hate on the people with higher statuses than them. It's really grim to see the people older than me being simply this stupid. I've realised that keeping/removing these boards should be decided by the people who get shit from them. Well, carry on.

[Frank]

Holy shit. I just had a look over the whole Anonyboards. And the amount of braindeads on it is really something... All they do is hate on the people with higher statuses than them. It's really grim to see the people older than me being simply this stupid. I've realised that keeping/removing these boards should be decided by the people who get shit from them. Well, carry on.

>status

That's so snob.

[Samo]

>status

That's so snob.

Yeah... it does sound so, but hear me out

[Prox]

Saying that all of ab threads that were made against some people because of their ranks or other stupid reason is stupid. People didn't started those kind of threads just because they felt like it's going to be fun, I know for a fact that most of the very first so called "hate' threads were telling the truth, but now it seems that most of these kind of threads are made just to piss people off...

[Tiger Guy]

Maybe admins should be able to ban people that post things that are beyond retarded.

[Sabb]

Maybe admins should be able to ban people that post things that are beyond retarded.

This is what I'm saying. I see the be the only admin who actually really wants it so monitoring it would mostly be up to me I guess... but what I've been saying is that a lot of the stuff posted (mostly previously, but still some currently) is purely attacking members. If such things were posted here, they would EASILY get a warning or ban. But on there it's a free run, I don't think it should be. With that said though, I wouldn't ban/remove posts or what ever unless the post is directly attacking and insulting someone in an unnecessary way. Like, I think a lot of people are afraid of the boards being monitored because they want to express their opinions without being known... which I disagree with doing but if they want to they would still be able to. And if we were given powers on anonyboards I don't think any other admins would really be removing posts often either unless really necessary. Jman would probably be the only one who would also be removing stuff occasionally.

Also: IF there were to be something added so that admins could monitor ab a little bit... I think it should be something like this:
1. Can only ban up to 1 month.
2. Can only ban a user after they've had 3 posts removed.
3. Obviously, able to remove posts.

Not sure if we'd be able to do the whole only being able to ban a user after 3 posts have been removed, but if possible that'd probably be best imo.

[Tiger Guy]

This is what I'm saying. I see the be the only admin who actually really wants it so monitoring it would mostly be up to me I guess... but what I've been saying is that a lot of the stuff posted (mostly previously, but still some currently) is purely attacking members. If such things were posted here, they would EASILY get a warning or ban. But on there it's a free run, I don't think it should be. With that said though, I wouldn't ban/remove posts or what ever unless the post is directly attacking and insulting someone in an unnecessary way. Like, I think a lot of people are afraid of the boards being monitored because they want to express their opinions without being known... which I disagree with doing but if they want to they would still be able to. And if we were given powers on anonyboards I don't think any other admins would really be removing posts often either unless really necessary. Jman would probably be the only one who would also be removing stuff occasionally.

Also: IF there were to be something added so that admins could monitor ab a little bit... I think it should be something like this:
1. Can only ban up to 1 month.
2. Can only ban a user after they've had 3 posts removed.
3. Obviously, able to remove posts.

Not sure if we'd be able to do the whole only being able to ban a user after 3 posts have been removed, but if possible that'd probably be best imo.

My idea is:

1. Ban the user
2. The comment stays, but with [USER HAS BEEN BANNED FOR THIS POST(INSERT REASON HERE)] at the bottom.
3. The thread gets less shitposted.

If an admin makes a questionable ban, there is a page for the latest bans and by who. Users won't have a specific id, but would be IP banned, but somehow would be kept secret from the admin that banned him to keep the person anonymous.

If the person switches IPs just to shitpost again, they need to rethink their life.

Also, I think tripcodes should be available incase someone wants to make a post without people wondering who posted it.

I don't know how hard it would be to do this, but I think it would make anon board a better place if implemented. Hell, I'd volunteer monitoring it if no other admin wants to do it.

[Sabb]

My idea is:

1. Ban the user
2. The comment stays, but with [USER HAS BEEN BANNED FOR THIS POST(INSERT REASON HERE)] at the bottom.
3. The thread gets less shitposted.

If an admin makes a questionable ban, there is a page for the latest bans and by who. Users won't have a specific id, but would be IP banned, but somehow would be kept secret from the admin that banned him to keep the person anonymous.

If the person switches IPs just to shitpost again, they need to rethink their life.

Also, I think tripcodes should be available incase someone wants to make a post without people wondering who posted it.

I don't know how hard it would be to do this, but I think it would make anon board a better place if implemented. Hell, I'd volunteer monitoring it if no other admin wants to do it.

I actually think this would probably be better. But... I think coolz mentioned before that he can't implement tripcodes for some reason... I can't remember why... and I may be wrong but I think i recall him saying that.

[ursus]

Also, I think tripcodes should be available incase someone wants to make a post without people wondering who posted it.

I suggested this months ago, and nobody gave a fuck enough to implement it.

[Sabb]

I suggested this months ago, and nobody gave a fuck enough to implement it.

I recall that... but also:

I actually think this would probably be better. But... I think coolz mentioned before that he can't implement tripcodes for some reason... I can't remember why... and I may be wrong but I think i recall him saying that.

[Frank]

Haha, no. Anony should stay anony.

[ursus]

Haha, no. Anony should stay anony.

I'm beginning to question your reading ability.

We're suggesting that we add the OPTION to have a tripcode. Opción, optie, オプション, opcja, opção, opzione, 选项. You can be as anonymous as you want. We want to stop FORCING people to be anon.