FUCK SHIT FUCK NO RAPE RAPE FUCK DAMN (Bethesda buys rights to S.T.A.L.K.E.R.)

[Deathie]

Well so far GSC actually made stalker well enough, fully on its own to not require any DLC to enjoy it further. And just to ensure that, mods. Mods errywhere. While bethesda did the same with mod support for skyrim and fallout and stuff, it's just sad to see that the tradition of a full game might be broken.

You're saying that like the Bethesda's DLCs are a bad thing.

They aren't like other companies, they don't cut content or charge you 15$ for a map pack.

When they give you DLC, they give you content that wasn't even worked on or conceived until after the game came out, to give the player more to do in the game.

It's not like "LOL TO GET THE ENDING, GOTTA BUY OUR DLC" or something, and they always release a full game. They just add more.

[Seb]

Stalker on the Skyrim engine (which is basically a tweaked Gamebryo).

And with Bethesda's story-writing abilites,

That is all.

[Deathie]

Stalker on the Skyrim engine (which is basically a tweaked Gamebryo).

And with Bethesda's story-writing abilites,

That is all.

>implying xRay engine is any better
>implying CoP's plot was so gripping and amazing

[Supertoaster]

>implying xRay engine is any better
>implying CoP's plot was so gripping and amazing

find the helicopters.

[Osme]

find the helicopters.

And thats why stalker CoP was the most enjoyable. But I did like CS too.
I dont see why everyone wanted CS to die in a pit.

>implying xRay engine is any better
>implying CoP's plot was so gripping and amazing

It got SoC done, all I care about. Everything can be thrown in a ditch
Its superior to most fps plots, seeing as most are "Hi guys, there was a terrorist group, so we went to war with a region the day after they were mean."
Oh shit, thats realistic ._.

[Deathie]

It got SoC done, all I care about. Everything can be thrown in a ditch

Well, yeah. I'm comparing it to CoP because Fallout 3's plot was great. I was actually interested in the story in one of these games for once. So was SoC's.

New Vegas' and CoP both had really boring and shitty plots though, and they were the newest games in their franchises.

[Seb]

Fallout 3's plot was great

No.

[Deathie]

No.

Yes.

[Seb]

Yes.

Why couldn't you use the GECK to restoring the land, which is a much better reason to use it than for a dumbass water purifier? Why the hell does a water purifier need a piece of magic like the GECK, anyways? Why would the Enclave sabotage the machine they were trying to use just to get you?

[Osme]

Why couldn't you use the GECK to restoring the land, which is a much better reason to use it than for a dumbass water purifier? Why the hell does a water purifier need a piece of magic like the GECK, anyways? Why would the Enclave sabotage the machine they were trying to use just to get you?

Because carbon filters are magic and everyone knows that. Carbon only exists in stars or something. Government wants to help the people, but they also want to rain bombs down upon the cities and they kill every civilian their soldiers see. Because Bethesda wanted to be stupid
This is what Im afraid of happening to stalker. The zone will end is the stupidest possible way. Its likely to end anyhow, due to Strelok's desire to cease its existence, but I dont want Bethesda to say "OHOHO GOVERNMENT GUNNA SABOTAGE" or some stupid load like that.

Death, Bethesda might make good games, but theyve got the attention span of a gnat. A swarm of them

[Supertoaster]

When Dad died in Fallout 3 I felt sad.

[Osme]

New Vegas' and CoP both had really boring and shitty plots though, and they were the newest games in their franchises.

Bethesda didnt dev FONV. They released and created the patches for it. Stalker has a decent chance to end up with similar mistakes that FO3 had. The idea of that makes me sad

[Seb]

New Vegas' and CoP both had really boring and shitty plots though, and they were the newest games in their franchises.

Woah woah woah woah WOAH.

How does somebody think FO3 had a good plot and NV didn't? How is that even possible?

[Deathie]

Bethesda didnt dev FONV. They released and created the patches for it. Stalker has a decent chance to end up with similar mistakes that FO3 had. The idea of that makes me sad

Bethesda bought the rights to publish STALKER. That doesn't immediately mean they're deving it either.

Woah woah woah woah WOAH.

How does somebody think FO3 had a good plot and NV didn't? How is that even possible?

Fuck off.

[Seb]

Fuck off.

Seriously, dude. I mean, how is that- why.