FUCK YES
YES
YES
YES
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES
I'm just glad that one of my favorite games isn't dead.
Its nice that it isnt dead (It never died, but it was in limbo ._.), but its sad that GSC wont be doing it. I doubt bethedsa and make it as nice as SoCit won't be as good as the originals, nothing ever is
it won't be as good as the originals, nothing ever is
but bethesda is pretty good.
Be glad fucking Activision or EA didn't pick it up.The only thing that would prevent my purchase of stalker 2
The only thing that would prevent my purchase of stalker 2
Bethesda is probably going to break the tradition of STALKER having no DLC.Apocalypse 2012 DLC. Released the day before the game. Contains spit cannon and katana.
Apocalypse 2012 DLC. Released the day before the game. Contains spit cannon and katana.
The Mayan DLC. Released the day before the game. Contains canned potatoes.
Rebirth DLC. Released the day of the game. Contains a controller mask that makes all fellow stalkers shoot you in fear. Cosmetic.
If the release date is still the same as the rumors before, 12/22/12
When has bethesda ever fucked people over with DLCIts growing. And Im afraid it will grow fast.
I mean, even Skyrim is just now BARELY getting it's first DLC.
When has bethesda ever fucked people over with DLCWell so far GSC actually made stalker well enough, fully on its own to not require any DLC to enjoy it further. And just to ensure that, mods. Mods errywhere. While bethesda did the same with mod support for skyrim and fallout and stuff, it's just sad to see that the tradition of a full game might be broken.
I mean, even Skyrim is just now BARELY getting it's first DLC.
Well so far GSC actually made stalker well enough, fully on its own to not require any DLC to enjoy it further. And just to ensure that, mods. Mods errywhere. While bethesda did the same with mod support for skyrim and fallout and stuff, it's just sad to see that the tradition of a full game might be broken.
Stalker on the Skyrim engine (which is basically a tweaked Gamebryo).
And with Bethesda's story-writing abilites,
That is all.
>implying xRay engine is any betterfind the helicopters.
>implying CoP's plot was so gripping and amazing
find the helicopters.And thats why stalker CoP was the most enjoyable. But I did like CS too.
>implying xRay engine is any betterIt got SoC done, all I care about. Everything can be thrown in a ditch
>implying CoP's plot was so gripping and amazing
It got SoC done, all I care about. Everything can be thrown in a ditch
Fallout 3's plot was great
No.Yes.
Yes.
Why couldn't you use the GECK to restoring the land, which is a much better reason to use it than for a dumbass water purifier? Why the hell does a water purifier need a piece of magic like the GECK, anyways? Why would the Enclave sabotage the machine they were trying to use just to get you?Because carbon filters are magic and everyone knows that. Carbon only exists in stars or something. Government wants to help the people, but they also want to rain bombs down upon the cities and they kill every civilian their soldiers see. Because Bethesda wanted to be stupid
New Vegas' and CoP both had really boring and shitty plots though, and they were the newest games in their franchises.(http://puu.sh/P0sp)
New Vegas' and CoP both had really boring and shitty plots though, and they were the newest games in their franchises.
Bethesda didnt dev FONV. They released and created the patches for it. Stalker has a decent chance to end up with similar mistakes that FO3 had. The idea of that makes me sad
Woah woah woah woah WOAH.
How does somebody think FO3 had a good plot and NV didn't? How is that even possible?
Fuck off.