Even though admins have access to the logs, that wouldn't neccessarily explain why this guy didn't post any demo...or 'the' demo, I should say. Could include information such as before and after Degtyarev took those pictures during the logs. I mean, the admins could review that themselves, but I wasn't there...not everyone was themselves, but i'm sure that if I were (even if I'm a regular) I could've found out the truth and took pictures of these 'logs' myself. I could've even recorded a demo like Degtyarev did and posted it; but unfortunately I didn't because I obviously wasn't there - Well, even if I were, no doubt the admins will do a better job themselves, anyway. Not sure if I could've done better if I were there or not but I'm willing to due what's neccessary to find out the truth about this report - to see wether tech's guilty or not; wether i'm a regular or just some admin. Not to be rude, but I don't really care if I were even a vip - I'd still try and find out the truth myself - wether with the admins or not. So ... nothing personal, but if you want me to ask questions as a regular or a vip or whatever....
were you there when this happened too?
...What? It's not about that. Yes, everyone requires proof, but this is something which is rather hard to get proof of, hence me saying "Leave it to the admins."
I don't understand what your argument is. If you were there, you'd have gathered proof? Well, thats good, but you weren't. Nor are we going to lie to you about what happened in the report. You will find out what we decide, as will everyone else, with due time and when the investigation is done. Asking 1000 pointless questions and arguing with Deg solves nothing.
And no, I wasn't there, but notice that my first post contributed something to the report, whereas yours was just an argument?
