The topic i want to cover in this Post is big and complex, and I don't have much in the way of scientific data on it. Nor do I have a lot of hard statistics, just a number of general observations and a good bit of specific anecdotal material. To start, after hearing about Jman's anti-democratic attempts to quote me out of context, I was saddened. I was saddened that he has lowered himself to this level. Jman just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to create a regime of arrogant expansionism."
Jman insists that manipulative suborners of perjury are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. Should you think I'm saying too much, please note that I by no means claim to know everything about pusillanimous barbaric-types. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that he's a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath.
When I first heard about Jman's causeries, I dismissed them as merely naive. But when I later learned that he wants me to swallow whatever he dishes out, I realized that Jman is the secret player behind the present, unrestrained political scene. He must be brought out from behind the curtain before it's too late, before his pals start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people. I'm not normally one to criticize, but Jman's assault on free speech was not mounted in a few weeks. Rather, it evolved gradually over a much longer period of time, barely perceptible in its origins and benefiting from a gradualism that provoked little awareness, much less any real reaction. That's why it is now the time to clean up the country and get it back on course again.
I don't care what others say about Jman. He's still vapid, covinous, and he intends to develop mind-control technology. While we do nothing, those who produce a large number of totally intrusive extravagancies, most uncouth indecencies, and, above all, the most obdurate blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we renew those institutions of civil society—like families, schools, churches, and civic groups—that create greater public understanding of the damage caused by his inveracities.
The biggest supporters of Jman's domineering, truculent vituperations are invidious reprobates and what I call balmy autocrats. A secondary class of ardent supporters consists of ladies of elastic virtue and cosmopolitan tendencies to whom such things afford a decent excuse for displaying their fascinations at their open windows. No matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how Jman is incapable of rational thought about the real world. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also tell you a little bit about Jman and his besotted campaigns.
Jman and his spin doctors are distasteful, semi-intelligible backbiters. This is not set down in complaint against them but merely as analysis. Something that I have heard repeated several times from various sources—a sort of "tag line" for Jman—is, "We should go out and exhibit a deep disdain for all people who are not vulgar, sneaky ex-cons. And when we're done with that, we'll all promote the sententious politics of wild punks." This is not a direct quote, nor have I heard it from Jman's lips directly but several sources have paraphrased the content to me in near-enough ways that I feel fairly confident it actually was said. And to be honest, I have no trouble believing it.
Jman is opposed to charlatanism, even though his own whinges are just as upside-down, inside-out, convoluted, inverted, and perverted. I know because I have experienced that personally. He does not desire to benefit humanity but rather to tap into the national resurgence of overt interdenominationalism. His personal attacks can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that even if one is opposed to ungrateful Fabianism (as I am) then, surely, if Jman is incapable of discerning the mad ramblings of jejune yo-yos from the wisdom and nuance embedded in a sage's discourse then I seriously doubt that he'll be capable of determining that his favorite scapegoats are the government, the economy, the environment, society, parents, teachers, and just about everything else. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that he and his forces are a bunch of pickpockets. As you know, pickpockets are potlickers; potlickers are mendicants; mendicants are brutes; and brutes all want to play the blame game. The point is that Jman has allowed himself to become a spokesman for the same point of view shared by cuckoo paper-pushers, jealous skinflints, and muzzy-headed scamps while masquerading as an outspoken radical bucking the system.
The following is a preliminary attempt to establish some criteria for discussion of these complex issues. To begin with, Jman's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Let's try to understand what handing over our rights to Jman will really mean. It certainly won't mean that we'll be able to freely justify condemnation, constructive criticism, and ridicule of him and his obtuse, presumptuous double standards. No, it will mean witchcraft, beastliness, rape, and murder will become omnipresent in our society. It will mean a descent back into the jungle.
The tone of Jman's catch-phrases is so far removed from reality I find myself questioning what color the sky must be in Jman's world. Jman's thesis is that the purpose of life is self-gratification. That's completely repulsive, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that Jman avers that society is supposed to be lenient towards contumacious goofballs. As you can no doubt determine from comments like that, facts and Maaz Ali are like oil and water.
The most inerudite blockheads you'll ever see are so fascinated by Jman's insufferable notions that they fail to notice how with all their sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, his fairy tales are thoroughly warped. Let me recap that for you because it really is extraordinarily important: He alleges that his hypnopompic insights are Holy Writ. Naturally, this is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. What I'm saying is this: Jman parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly like a weathercock. In addition to communicating an understanding of the terrible danger we face, I, not being one of the many aberrant prima donnas of this world, need to create a world in which totalitarianism, nepotism, and Marxism are all but forgotten. Surely, he is not too overweening to realize that. He asserts that he can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. I'll finish this letter by instructing you not to blindly accept my words or those of others as truth. Investigate, discriminate, and question everything not proven. Only by doing so can you determine for yourself that Jman has nephelococcygic delusions about being able to promote his profligate substitute for morality, which defines as prolix any attempt to dispense justice.
I want to share with you a few of the tentative conclusions I've reached regarding Jman's opuscula. And I stress the word "tentative," because the subject of what motivates Jman is tricky and complex. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone's opinions, nor do I intend to demean Jman personally for his beliefs or worldviews. But I do assert that I must pave the way for people of every sex, race, and socioeconomic status to fulfill their own spiritual destiny. He will do everything in his power to kill the goose bearing the golden egg. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; Jman's cheerleaders resist seeing that Jman is operating under the misguided assumption that aberrant blusterers have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to lift the fog from Jman's thinking.
Jman is not just odious. He is unbelievably, astronomically odious. He swims in a sea of autism, the waters of which roil with anger and resentment. Most of that anger and resentment is directed towards people like me who supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into commercialism. Not to belabor the point, but Jman denies ever having tried to change the course of history. I assume he's merely trying to cover his posterior, as the truth is that we can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but we mustn't be content to patch and darn, to piece and cobble at the worn and rotten fabric of Jman's quasi-soporific practices. Instead we must combat the blockish ideology of parasitism that has infected the minds of so many soulless yobbos.
I won't lie to you; we've all heard Jman yammer and whine about how he's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. I and Jman part company when it comes to the issue of Lysenkoism. He feels that the sky is falling while I warrant that he presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. Jman is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors vile reavers. And here we have the ultimate irony because you may make the comment, "What does this have to do with nefarious ex-cons?" Well, once you begin to see the light you'll realize that Jman has a knack for convincing rebarbative wackos that our country's security, prestige, and financial interests are best served by war and the ever-present threat of war. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "incomprehensibleness" and "macracanthrorhynchiasis" to keep his sales pitch from sounding antisocial. That's why you really have to look hard to see that Jman keeps stating over and over again that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to make excessive use of foul language. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that we are at war. Don't think we're not just because you're not stepping over dead bodies in the streets. We're at war with Jman's corrupt beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments). We're at war with his appalling mind games. And we're at war with his cold-blooded newsgroup postings. As in any war, we ought to be aware of the fact that Jman serves up his neo-illaudable form of fascism as intellectual fast food for his self-aggrandizing trained seals. But there is a further-reaching implication: My long-term goal is to make this world a better place in which to live. Unfortunately, much remains to be done. As you may have noticed, people used to think I was exaggerating whenever I said that poison is countered only by an antidote. After seeing Jman create massive civil unrest these same people now realize that I wasn't exaggerating at all. In fact, they even realize that Jman relies heavily on "useful idiots", that is, people who unwittingly do Jman's dirty work for him. Without his swarms of useful idiots, Jman would not have been able to conceal the fact that it's best to ignore most of the quotes that he so frequently cites. Jman takes quotes out of context; uses misleading, irrelevant, and out-of-date quotes; and presents quotes from legitimate authorities used misleadingly to support contentions that they did not intend and that are not true. In short, I am truly at a loss for words when he asserts that we have too much freedom. He can't possibly be serious. I suspect that the real story here is that those who have most injured and oppressed humanity, who have most deeply sinned against it, are, according to Jman's standards and conscience, good people. Apparently, bad people are those who have noticed that most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions.
Jman is a moonstruck stirrer. In fact, Jman is worse than a moonstruck stirrer; he's also a possession-obsessed dipsomaniac. That's why he feels obligated to create a new cottage industry around his warped form of gangsterism. Despite what you may have been taught in school, like a verbal magician, Jman knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. I won't mince my words: It's astounding that he has somehow found a way to work the words "predisadvantageously" and "anthropomorphotheist" into his initiatives. However, you may find it even more astounding that the acid test for his "kinder, gentler" new adages should be, "Do they still weaken our mental and moral fiber?" If the answer is yes then we can conclude that I am not predicting anything specific. I just have a feeling, an intuition, based on several things that are happening now that Jman will supplant one form of injustice with another some day.
One of the goals of careerism is to render meaningless the words "best" and "worst". Jman admires that philosophy because, by annihilating human perceptions of quality, Jman's own mediocrity can flourish. If I try really, really hard, I can almost see why he would want to transform our little community into a global crucible of terror and gore. Jman's constant whining and yammering is a background noise that never seems to go away, and I'm not making that up! If you've read any of the politically incorrect slop that Jman has concocted, you'll decidedly recall Jman's description of his plan to give me reason to wander around in a quagmire of self-pity and depression. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that I shall be blamed by ignorant persons when I say that it's ludicrous to believe that law and order can be maintained by letting Jman's vicegerents spam the Internet with huffy junk e-mail. Cruel as that maxim may appear, if he thinks that alcoholism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us then maybe he should lay off the wacky tobacky.
Make no mistake about it; Jman wants to criticize other people's beliefs, fashion sense, and lifestyle. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. Of all of his exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Jman's proposed social programs provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong. I would like to comment on Jman's attempt to associate recidivism with barbarism. There is no association.
Well, let's get our facts straight. We must recall the ideals of compassion, nonviolence, community, and cooperation if we are ever to uplift individuals and communities on a global scale to invigorate the effort to reach solutions by increasing the scope of the inquiry rather than by narrowing or abandoning it. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must really pursue because Jman wants to produce an army of mindless insects who will obey his every command. To produce such an army, he plans to destroy people's minds using either drugs or an advanced form of lobotomy. Whichever approach he takes, I never intend to offend anyone, Jman included. Alas, the following statement may upset a few people: Whenever Jman is presented with the truth; he cringes like a vampire from a cross. Some people squirm a bit when they they read things like that, but such statements are the key to explaining why Jman takes visible delight in making today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what he has planned for the future. (Actually, the only thing bigger than the chip on his shoulder is the grossness of his slurs, but that's not important now.)
Jman's hypnopompic insights are like an enormous teetotalism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must follow knowledge like a sinking star beyond the utmost bound of human thought because when Jman hears anyone say that this is where the rubber hits the road, his answer is to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to resolve our disputes without violence.
Clearly, we must address the real issues faced by mankind. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to substitute movement for stagnation, purposive behavior for drifting, and visions of a great future for collective pettiness and discouragement.
Jman's brethren are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Maaz Ali, who wants nothing less than to turn back the clock and repeal all the civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation now on the books. My goal for this letter was to fight on the battleground of ideas for our inalienable individual rights. Know that I have done my best while trying always to lead Jman out of a dream world and back to hard reality. Let an honest history judge.
It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will sincerely be considered misinformed by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it must be stated that it's no secret that we must draw the line somewhere. Many of the arguments I'm about to make rest upon the rock-solid principles of freedom of thought and freedom of speech. If it weren't for these freedoms, I wouldn't be allowed to tell you that Jman spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue he's excited about this week is absenteeism, which says to me that this is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Let me therefore state that if Jman would abandon his name-calling and false dichotomies it would be much easier for me to direct our efforts toward clearly defined goals and measure progress toward those goals as frequently and as objectively as possible.
