Total Members Voted: 13
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
In response to Mr. Krabs's scare tactics, I would like to offer the following opposing points. I would like to start by discussing Krabs's slurs, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that when one examines the ramifications of letting Krabs stand in the way of progress, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that his favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". Krabs likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. He then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for him to create a desolation and call it peace. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that even when the facts don't fit, Krabs sometimes tries to use them anyway. He still maintains, for instance, that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. When Krabs says that anyone who resists him deserves to be crushed, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound.If the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to draw a picture of what we conceive of under the word "indistinguishableness". I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Krabs squeeze every last drop of blood from our overworked, overtaxed bodies. It makes me want to set the record straight, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that Krabs has for a long time been arguing that quislingism is the key to world peace. Had he instead been arguing that we must keep our eyes on the prize, I might cede him his point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Krabs's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how any rational argument must acknowledge this. His stolid, self-serving newsgroup postings, naturally, do notLet me recite the following phrases as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward towards increased ability to goad jaundiced hoodlums into hurling epithets at Krabs's critics: unsavory incubi; base-minded creeps; academicism; Krabs's protégés; Krabs. My point is that Krabs is causing all sorts of problems for us. We must grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way. He has no conscience and therefore no feelings of guilt for hoodooing us. Hard to believe? Then consider the following statement from one of his dastardly, daffy secret agents: "Black is white and night is day." Pretty frowsy, huh? Well, Krabs has no moral courage nor even a desire to be honest and forthright. So let Krabs call me hostile. I call him ill-bred.Must it be explained to Krabs that he is a small part of a large movement that seeks to impair the practice of democracy? Because he obviously doesn't realize that if he truly believes that he values our perspectives, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101. Lackadaisical finks may endanger our property or our security or our economic well-being, but Krabs endangers our souls. What can I do to prove to you that he is blinded by greed? Show you evidence that Krabs's peons argue, against a steady accretion of facts of already mountainous proportions, that we'd all be better off if they'd just topple society? While that would undoubtedly help, if I had to choose the most slovenly specimen from his welter of atrabilious gabble, it would have to be his claim that he has the authority to issue licenses for practicing gangsterism.Krabs hates people who have huge supplies of the things he lacks. What he lacks the most is common sense, which underlies my point that I frequently wish to tell Krabs that his remarks are based on prejudices and preconceived notions. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue. He's not your average churlish New Age loan shark. He's the deluxe model. As such, he's poised to give rise to disgusting thought police by the end of the decade.It is no news that Krabs is a splenetic spoiled brat. I'm being super-extra nice when I say that. If I weren't so polite I instead would have stated that now that I've been exposed to Krabs's indiscretions I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps Krabs's reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, he always begins an argument with his conclusion (e.g., that everything will be hunky-dory if we let him revile everything in the most obscene terms and drag it into the filth of the basest possible outlook) and therefore—not surprisingly—he always arrives at that very conclusion.Let me try to put this in perspective: Krabs has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and make people weak and dependent—all by trumping up a phony emergency. His squadristi portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression but are loath to reveal that I fully intend to make this world a kinder, gentler place. I will spare no labor in doing this and reckon no labor lost that brings me toward this mark. Even so, I am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly shed the light of truth on the evil that is Krabs. Nevertheless, I really do have the will to operate on today's real—not tomorrow's ideal—political terrain. That's why I honestly insist that Krabs is not as crapulous or mentally deficient as you might think. He's more so.That's a very important point; it's easy for us to shake our heads at Krabs's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should deal stiffly with unbalanced bums who use paid informants and provocateurs to produce a new generation of slimy flag burners whose opinions and prejudices, far from being enlightened and challenged, are simply legitimized. It's easy for us to say, "Krabs's roorbacks carry multiple connotations, ranging from the morally crippled (they promote the lie of ruffianism) to the chauvinistic (they reduce us to acute penury)." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because there's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I assert, there's a time to move as expeditiously as possible to bring Krabs down a peg. Or, to put it less poetically, Krabs is unquestionably up to something. I don't know exactly what, but he thinks that his activities are Holy Writ. However, his language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to arraign Krabs at the tribunal of public opinion because doing so clearly demonstrates how thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Krabs's projects are a modern-day example of a Procrustean bed. I was right when I said that Krabs's agitprop machine is running at full throttle. And I was right when I said that a central point of Krabs's belief systems is the notion that we should derive moral guidance from Krabs's glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented suggestions. Perhaps he should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that he has planted his satraps everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance Krabs's ability to rob Peter to pay Paul, but it also provides irrefutable evidence that he's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of commercialism and you'll see a clueless mendicant hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of faddism in a nettlesome attempt to use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to deny both our individual and collective responsibility to live in harmony with each other and the world. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that life is a search for the true, the good, and the beautiful. It is not, as Krabs believes, an excuse to operate in the gray area between legitimate activity and grotesque Bulverism.Krabs has repeatedly threatened to renege on an incredibly large number of promises. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because Krabs has a deficiency of real goals. There are several logical contradictions in his position on this matter. For example, Krabs says that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to his reprehensible prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. As usual, he can be counted on to wrap every actual fact in six layers of embellishment. The truth is that if Krabs got his way, he'd be able to palliate and excuse the atrocities of his cheerleaders. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. I'd like to end this letter with a message for Mr. Krabs. I'd like to say with emphasis and distinctness—not as a threat, but as a warning—that I will do whatever it takes to disentangle people from the snares set by Krabs and his cringers, and I won't let Krabs stop me from achieving that goal.
Even I tl;dr'd.holy shit.
Here, I'll bind that into a book for you.
Bind it to the Z key.
On a side note:No double posting.
Who double posted? Or mabye im not quite understanding what your saying.
Im not sure what you mean by double posting two different threads or two different replys next to eachother. Second off if its the two replys thats because it was too long for me to fit it in 1 post max letter count is 20,000 a post.
Copy part of my essay.D:
Somone needs to read it all. its only 11,700 words
one word =/= one letterThe brown fox jumps over the lazy dog36 letters, 7 words
Poll
