Restricted (Read Only) > VIPs

Reporting regulars for retarded-ass votes

(1/3) > >>

ursus:
Title more or less says it all. If a regular deliberately votes no on a vote that's clearly justified with no room for debate, what's the point at which it's considered grounds for demotion?

I personally don't think there should be any tolerance for it. It makes my day that much worse.

Deathie:
Not sure what the others think, but I've always considered that grounds for demotion. People just need to make more threads/reports about regulars doing this.

Sabb:

--- Quote from: Death M.D. on August 23, 2012, 10:21:25 AM ---Not sure what the others thing, but I've always considered that grounds for demotion. People just need to make more threads/reports about regulars doing this.

--- End quote ---
I also treat it the same. I don't like uncooperative Regs, I understand how difficult it makes it for VIPs.

Cable:
Well yeah. I mean, its the only thing a reg CAN do wrong. If they can't press the right button, they shouldn't have regular.

Sabb:
Keep in mind though it is up to their judgement too. If they were to just vote yes on the vote every time there would be no point in regulars. So it's up to their judgement but they will be easily demoted if they make poor judgements and make the situation harder to deal with. But if the vote is based on something that they don't agree with for good reason then they most likely won't be demoted.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page