I just realized..

[Don]

It's sad because when compared to prior installments (Battlefield 3 being Battlefield 1 and 2 none of that Bad Company excuse for games) both of them are pretty shit games.

It's because the target market changed.
Simple, straight-forward run'n'gun games with a ton of brown and bloom sell infinitely better than any other kind of shooting game. Games have to be dumbed down to appeal to the "call of duty crowd".

Then again, what you like or don't like is always subjective, so saying that "BF3 is better than MW3!" or "TF2 is the best shooter ever" is silly.

[Deacon]

[Rocket50]

Nope. You are wrong.

I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3

COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.

>Graphics are different between multiplayer and singleplayer
>MW3 has storyline

mfw

[Seb]

Nope. You are wrong.

I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3

COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.

the_average_cod_player.png

[Rocket50]

the_average_cod_player.png

To be fair, the only good thing about CoD is its fast-paced run and gun gameplay, as opposed to battlefield, flashpoint, and arma which are slower.

Some people enjoy that shit I guess :/ 

[blαh2355]

I came.

[Frank]

To be fair, the only good thing about CoD is its fast-paced run and gun gameplay, as opposed to battlefield, flashpoint, and arma which are slower.

Some people enjoy that shit I guess :/ 

>Battlefield
>Slow
>dude wat

[Cake Faice]

Nope. You are wrong.

I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3

COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.

I hope to god you're not serious.

[Mr. Franklin]

Kuma War anyone?


no but seriously, has anyone ever played Kuma War back in 2003?

[Astropilot]

Um...Crysis?

[Alphaggot]

Um...Crysis?

bitchpls.

The only thing Crysis is actually used for now is bench-marking. You can say it was a good game but only such a big pool of people can play and enjoy.

[Shockah]

It's because the target market changed.
Simple, straight-forward run'n'gun games with a ton of brown and bloom sell infinitely better than any other kind of shooting game. Games have to be dumbed down to appeal to the "call of duty crowd".

Then again, what you like or don't like is always subjective, so saying that "BF3 is better than MW3!" or "TF2 is the best shooter ever" is silly.

You're absolutely correct. There's no right answer to which is better, only which you prefer. I play to win not to have fun so I don't like how ridiculously gay both franchises are becoming.

[Frank]

You're absolutely correct. There's no right answer to which is better, only which you prefer. I play to win not to have fun so I don't like how ridiculously gay both franchises are becoming.

>gay
Please die.

And yes, you can say which is better, simply by looking at how it's programmed. Bugs, optimization, etc.

[Deacon]

>gay
Please die.

And yes, you can say which is better, simply by looking at how it's programmed. Bugs, optimization, etc.

Oh quit your bitching, with all the shit you say.

[Frank]

Oh quit your bitching, with all the shit you say.

Excuuuuuuuuuuse me, Deacon, but do you ever see me saying "that's so nigger" or "those games are so spic"? Have you ever seriously seen me seriously using such words in a serious manner to offend? Are you bliiiiind?