.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers

.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) => Discussion => Topic started by: Pryvisee on April 20, 2012, 06:47:47 PM

Title: I just realized..
Post by: Pryvisee on April 20, 2012, 06:47:47 PM
That Battlefield is a lot better than any of the call of dutys.. Just the animations, gameplay and fanbase surpass call of duty by a long shot. I still enjoy call of duty, but battlefield is probably my new major online fps for sure.

What's your guys opinions on Battlefield vs Call of Duty. Which do you prefer? And why?
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Deathie on April 20, 2012, 06:49:53 PM
I promise you everyone here will say battlefield.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Dale Feles on April 20, 2012, 06:52:53 PM
No shit it's better then COD. Well, atleast the new shitty modern-warfares.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Cake Faice on April 20, 2012, 07:00:07 PM
No shit it's better then COD. Well, atleast the new shitty modern-warfares.
Call of Duty 1-4 were pretty amazing. But once Modern Fagfare 2 came out, that's when it started to deteriorate, as with the whole FPS genre in general.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Pryvisee on April 20, 2012, 07:03:15 PM
No shit it's better then COD. Well, atleast the new shitty modern-warfares.

I used to love the Modern Warfares more than Battlefield a couple of days ago.. And I hated Battlefield. :p But I never played it before and now that I have.. Its like a huge change.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: cogsandspigots on April 20, 2012, 07:06:23 PM
Call of Duty 1, 2, and 4 remain to be some of my favorite video games.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Seb on April 20, 2012, 07:14:26 PM
4 ruined modern FPSes and I don't see why everybody loves it so much.

Any CoD game is fun for the first week, I've never played Battlefield.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Deacon on April 20, 2012, 07:36:04 PM
Operation Flashpoint anyone?








































































............anyone?
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Hotgreensoldier on April 20, 2012, 07:54:51 PM
Operation Flashpoint anyone?


............anyone?

Dangit Deacon. I was waiting for a picture to load for quite a bit before I realized that you just put that at the bottom :L

Post some stuff about it?
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Frank on April 20, 2012, 08:57:19 PM
CoD4>BF3 all the fucking way. Also, ArmA>Battlefield
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: cogsandspigots on April 20, 2012, 09:48:36 PM
CoD4>BF3 all the fucking way. Also, ArmA>Battlefield
Arma has the most confusing control scheme I have ever used.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Rocket50 on April 20, 2012, 09:50:51 PM
Arma has the most confusing control scheme I have ever used.

There are literally over 50 difference functions... I love it. Realism at its best

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

On topic:

Battlefield is 50x better than CoD. CoD used to be a good franchise until they realised how their fanbase is a bunch of suckers and will buy up any pile of shit they manage to scrape together.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Samo on April 20, 2012, 10:06:29 PM
BF3 and CoD 6-__ both are quite boring. Battlefield 3 takes too much from CoD and it's just mind numbing. But Bad Company 2... I LOVE THAT SHIT!
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Tezuni on April 20, 2012, 11:26:37 PM
I got the BF 1942 collection, BF2, and BC2, but not BF3 :( cause the graphics would kill my PC lol.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Don on April 21, 2012, 12:40:23 AM
arma 2 all the way
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Shockah on April 21, 2012, 01:07:23 AM
Dangit Deacon. I was waiting for a picture to load for quite a bit before I realized that you just put that at the bottom :L

Post some stuff about it?

It's the most uninteresting fps in the world, if you're any younger then 14. If not you'll more then likely appreciate the realism when compared to any other fps present today. It's a first person with moderate rts elements meaning aka you control anywhere from 4-30ish guys and you can also take first person perspective on one of the squads and control vehicles and such from 1st person view whilst at the same time using your map to control your other units. Really good game if there's people on playing (have it for console). Heard red river (the sequel) wasn't too great though.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Deacon on April 21, 2012, 01:14:39 AM
It's the most uninteresting fps in the world, if you're any younger then 14. If not you'll more then likely appreciate the realism when compared to any other fps present today. It's a first person with moderate rts elements meaning aka you control anywhere from 4-30ish guys and you can also take first person perspective on one of the squads and control vehicles and such from 1st person view whilst at the same time using your map to control your other units. Really good game if there's people on playing (have it for console). Heard red river (the sequel) wasn't too great though.

Red River tried to blend the Squad feel together, which took alot of the sandbox styling out of Dragon Rising (as in, you could go anywhere do anything to finish the mission within your time frames).

Its still a good time, once the fighting starts with China. There's just less to do.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Samo on April 21, 2012, 06:01:22 AM
I actually really liked Dragon Rising. Though it was ruined when I played co-op with a few friends. They kept crashing our vehicles and getting hit all the time. Singleplayer was still pretty good though.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Deacon on April 21, 2012, 10:09:32 AM
Yes, it was. Too bad codemasters shut down that studio, nO more operation flashpoints.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Astropilot on April 21, 2012, 11:00:53 AM
Call Of Duty is a run and gun
Battlefield you drive stuff, work in teams, have objectives
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: StartedBullet on April 21, 2012, 10:02:39 PM
The modern warfare series just plain suck. Honestly, why buy the same game again?
 
With battlefield, you get vehicles, graphics, gameplay, humor, plot, and a bunch of other things alot better.
 
 
I did enjoy World At War, though.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Loke on April 21, 2012, 10:08:56 PM
All the Call of Duties before 5 were great before it just went downhill.
Now it's full of 10 year old kids who say they did your mom.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: [TTPN] ShadowMoon on April 21, 2012, 11:38:31 PM
I promise you everyone here will say battlefield.

Nope. You are wrong.

I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3

COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Supertoaster on April 21, 2012, 11:46:10 PM
Nope. You are wrong.

I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3

COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.
my face when realistic graphics (http://i2.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/005/180/fuckthat.jpg)
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Deathie on April 21, 2012, 11:54:44 PM
COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak

(http://beingnerdy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/BF3-MW3-2.jpg)
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Doctor Who on April 22, 2012, 12:53:19 AM
my face when realistic graphics (http://i2.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/005/180/fuckthat.jpg)
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Frank on April 22, 2012, 01:28:00 AM
Nope. You are wrong.

I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3

COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.

Haha, no.
MW3's story is shit. MW3's singleplayer campaign is shit.

MW3 IS shit. Not even multiplayer is good. I bothered as much as to go to 3/4 of the story. Then I just read how it ended, because it sucked.

However, if BF3 wasn't so fucking buggy and had such shitty online systems, it'd win.

But it's fucking buggy and has such shitty online systems. And singleplayer is horrorific. They both lose.

0/10 would not bang
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: semy32 on April 22, 2012, 02:35:41 AM
Modern warfare 3 sucked honestly, nothing new, shit story, shit campaign

Cod 2 is still the best cod. And the graphics of cod 2 is good, I mean... just look at the guns.

Battlefield 3 sucked too. Shit story, Very shitty campaign, it's buggy as hell.

Even bad company 2 was shit.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Supertoaster on April 22, 2012, 03:53:36 AM
It's sad because Team Fortress 2 is better then both of them.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Shockah on April 22, 2012, 03:58:59 AM
It's sad because when compared to prior installments (Battlefield 3 being Battlefield 1 and 2 none of that Bad Company excuse for games) both of them are pretty shit games.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Don on April 22, 2012, 05:23:38 AM
It's sad because when compared to prior installments (Battlefield 3 being Battlefield 1 and 2 none of that Bad Company excuse for games) both of them are pretty shit games.
It's because the target market changed.
Simple, straight-forward run'n'gun games with a ton of brown and bloom sell infinitely better than any other kind of shooting game. Games have to be dumbed down to appeal to the "call of duty crowd".

Then again, what you like or don't like is always subjective, so saying that "BF3 is better than MW3!" or "TF2 is the best shooter ever" is silly.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Deacon on April 22, 2012, 08:53:26 AM
(http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/560939541743629954/A757D470D1CD0CFD67228B1A4BC4A8A52F2B0F45/)
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Rocket50 on April 22, 2012, 09:36:04 AM
Nope. You are wrong.

I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3

COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.

>Graphics are different between multiplayer and singleplayer
>MW3 has storyline

mfw
(http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRhBDwxwTw3CkOmhktjCwTJIJDAQ3j6ipooXiZavsDij8_D2bO2csIkMGuCgA)
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Seb on April 22, 2012, 09:52:40 AM
Nope. You are wrong.

I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3

COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.


the_average_cod_player.png
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Rocket50 on April 22, 2012, 11:55:11 AM
the_average_cod_player.png

To be fair, the only good thing about CoD is its fast-paced run and gun gameplay, as opposed to battlefield, flashpoint, and arma which are slower.

Some people enjoy that shit I guess :/ 
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: blαh2355 on April 22, 2012, 12:05:20 PM
(http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/560939541743629954/A757D470D1CD0CFD67228B1A4BC4A8A52F2B0F45/)
I came.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Frank on April 22, 2012, 12:11:12 PM
To be fair, the only good thing about CoD is its fast-paced run and gun gameplay, as opposed to battlefield, flashpoint, and arma which are slower.

Some people enjoy that shit I guess :/ 
>Battlefield
>Slow
>dude wat
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Cake Faice on April 22, 2012, 12:14:54 PM
Nope. You are wrong.

I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3

COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.

I hope to god you're not serious.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Mr. Franklin on April 22, 2012, 12:21:14 PM
Kuma War anyone?


no but seriously, has anyone ever played Kuma War back in 2003?
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Astropilot on April 22, 2012, 12:26:15 PM
Um...Crysis?
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Alphaggot on April 22, 2012, 12:29:07 PM
Um...Crysis?


bitchpls.

The only thing Crysis is actually used for now is bench-marking. You can say it was a good game but only such a big pool of people can play and enjoy.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Shockah on April 22, 2012, 12:29:47 PM
It's because the target market changed.
Simple, straight-forward run'n'gun games with a ton of brown and bloom sell infinitely better than any other kind of shooting game. Games have to be dumbed down to appeal to the "call of duty crowd".

Then again, what you like or don't like is always subjective, so saying that "BF3 is better than MW3!" or "TF2 is the best shooter ever" is silly.

You're absolutely correct. There's no right answer to which is better, only which you prefer. I play to win not to have fun so I don't like how ridiculously gay both franchises are becoming.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Frank on April 22, 2012, 01:22:54 PM
You're absolutely correct. There's no right answer to which is better, only which you prefer. I play to win not to have fun so I don't like how ridiculously gay both franchises are becoming.
>gay
Please die.

And yes, you can say which is better, simply by looking at how it's programmed. Bugs, optimization, etc.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Deacon on April 22, 2012, 02:40:17 PM
>gay
Please die.

And yes, you can say which is better, simply by looking at how it's programmed. Bugs, optimization, etc.

Oh quit your bitching, with all the shit you say.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Frank on April 22, 2012, 03:12:03 PM
Oh quit your bitching, with all the shit you say.
Excuuuuuuuuuuse me, Deacon, but do you ever see me saying "that's so nigger" or "those games are so spic"? Have you ever seriously seen me seriously using such words in a serious manner to offend? Are you bliiiiind?
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Mr. Franklin on April 22, 2012, 03:24:28 PM
Excuuuuuuuuuuse me, Deacon, but do you ever see me saying "that's so nigger" or "those games are so spic"? Have you ever seriously seen me seriously using such words in a serious manner to offend? Are you bliiiiind?
What the fuck is wrong with you frank, you haven't changed.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Deacon on April 22, 2012, 03:36:28 PM
Excuuuuuuuuuuse me, Deacon, but do you ever see me saying "that's so nigger" or "those games are so spic"? Have you ever seriously seen me seriously using such words in a serious manner to offend? Are you bliiiiind?

Actually, yes. Yes I have.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Frank on April 22, 2012, 03:37:12 PM
What the fuck is wrong with you frank, you haven't changed.
Aaaaaaaaaaagh.

How many fucking times do I have to tell you? It only pisses me off when people use such words to mean defects, as if being gay/black/latin was bad.
Actually, yes. Yes I have.
I would be most delighted if you gave me just one example. Only one. One is all I need.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Deacon on April 22, 2012, 03:38:45 PM
Aaaaaaaaaaagh.

How many fucking times do I have to tell you? It only pisses me off when people use such words to mean defects, as if being gay/black/latin was bad.I would be most delighted if you gave me just one example. Only one. One is all I need.

Yes, let me open up my blackmail folder. One moment please.

I don't have an example.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Frank on April 22, 2012, 03:43:27 PM
Yes, let me open up my blackmail folder. One moment please.

I don't have an example.
ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Sabb on April 22, 2012, 03:49:07 PM
Excuuuuuuuuuuse me, Deacon, but do you ever see me saying "that's so nigger" or "those games are so spic"? Have you ever seriously seen me seriously using such words in a serious manner to offend? Are you bliiiiind?
It's not MEANT offensive though, and you know that...
However, you might not say nigger or w.e to compare things to lower class or w.e, but only because it sounds fucking stupid. No one says that. But if people did, I can PROMISE you would be saying it, as you currently use nigger and such quite frequently any ways...
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Frank on April 22, 2012, 03:51:27 PM
It's not MEANT offensive though, and you know that...
However, you might not say nigger or w.e to compare things to lower class or w.e, but only because it sounds fucking stupid. No one says that. But if people did, I can PROMISE you would be saying it, as you currently use nigger and such quite frequently any ways...
I do use nigger. I use nigger a lot. As I use dyke, spic, faggot, etc. But what I want is for those words to be taken out of their offensive power. And actions like Shockah's go completely backwards in regards to that cause.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Sabb on April 22, 2012, 03:53:55 PM
I do use nigger. I use nigger a lot. As I use dyke, spic, faggot, etc. But what I want is for those words to be taken out of their offensive power. And actions like Shockah's go completely backwards in regards to that cause.
You do really screaming "DAMN NIGGER" whenever you're jokingly mad at someone for like, beating you at a game or something is using it in the pretty much same context that people use "gay". But it doesn't matter, no matter how you use it, people can be offended by it quite understandably.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Frank on April 22, 2012, 03:55:14 PM
You do really screaming "DAMN NIGGER" whenever you're jokingly mad at someone for like, beating you at a game or something is using it in the pretty much same context that people use "gay". But it doesn't matter, no matter how you use it, people can be offended by it quite understandably.
I never use it seriously. And that's the poooooooint. And yes, people can and DO get offended by it, which is why want to take the offensiveness out of such words. And making it taboo and forbidden fixes nothing.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Sabb on April 22, 2012, 03:58:22 PM
I never use it seriously. And that's the poooooooint. And yes, people can and DO get offended by it, which is why want to take the offensiveness out of such words. And making it taboo and forbidden fixes nothing.
But people aren't truly using it seriously when they say it either... like they aren't think "wow that's gay" as in "wow that's as bad as homosexuals". It's just... a term that everyone started using lol. Fortunately people do use it less now though. I'm actually... not sure if I still use it. Sounds stupid, but... yea... lol. I try not to use it at least.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Frank on April 22, 2012, 04:06:30 PM
But people aren't truly using it seriously when they say it either... like they aren't think "wow that's gay" as in "wow that's as bad as homosexuals". It's just... a term that everyone started using lol. Fortunately people do use it less now though. I'm actually... not sure if I still use it. Sounds stupid, but... yea... lol. I try not to use it at least.
But gay means glad, and also means people who like people of their own sex. So I find it pretty silly that it's used to say something's bad.
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Sabb on April 22, 2012, 04:07:38 PM
But gay means glad, and also means people who like people of their own sex. So I find it pretty silly that it's used to say something's bad.
Yes, but that's what society has turned it into. Just like slang words, it's all the same.
Anyways, I'd rather not derail the topic further sooo...
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Supertoaster on April 22, 2012, 04:19:52 PM
-snip-
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Seb on April 22, 2012, 05:03:18 PM
-snip-

(http://i620.photobucket.com/albums/tt283/Rotedria/1333936490425-1.png)
Title: Re: I just realized..
Post by: Rocket50 on April 22, 2012, 06:19:23 PM
>Battlefield
>Slower
>dude wat

FTFY