.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) > Discussion
[DICUSSION] New VIP Application Process
Prox:
I think that we could lower the vote count needed and remove the list of active VIP approvers meaning every admin would be considered as VIP approver, also I think that there shouldn't be a VIP vote limit...
...or we could add the VIPs to the active VIP approvers list meaning that their votes would count as much as other admins, but those VIPs shouldn't be only added because they're active on the servers, and perhaps they should be selected by the admins.
Shockah:
--- Quote from: Prox on April 01, 2012, 03:06:45 AM ---I think that we could lower the vote count needed and remove the list of active VIP approvers meaning every admin would be considered as VIP approver, also I think that there shouldn't be a VIP vote limit...
...or we could add the VIPs to the active VIP approvers list meaning that their votes would count as much as other admins, but those VIPs shouldn't be only added because they're active on the servers, and perhaps they should be selected by the admins.
--- End quote ---
This is what I think should be done most, it's not too much of an insane change we're keeping the old system and bending it just a bit. I think if we lower the vote count needed by 1 erase the "active approvers list" and drop the VIP vote limit then that will make the application system just a bit more fair.
coolzeldad:
--- Quote from: Shockah on April 01, 2012, 12:47:53 PM ---This is what I think should be done most, it's not too much of an insane change we're keeping the old system and bending it just a bit. I think if we lower the vote count needed by 1 erase the "active approvers list" and drop the VIP vote limit then that will make the application system just a bit more fair.
--- End quote ---
That's basically what I was proposing, however votes are detailed comments for or against the applicant with proof.
Then I'll check apps and weigh the considerations of both sides leading to an approval or disapproval.
Shockah:
--- Quote from: coolzeldad on April 01, 2012, 06:47:43 PM ---That's basically what I was proposing, however votes are detailed comments for or against the applicant with proof.
Then I'll check apps and weigh the considerations of both sides leading to an approval or disapproval.
--- End quote ---
Well then there we have it, if you are capable of reviewing vip apps (which you've stated you are) then that seems like the most practical option to myself. My only concern would be a person gets 2 votes and because both of those votes are good they get approved which is why I believe there should still be a certain amount of votes required just lowered by 2 or so.
coolzeldad:
--- Quote from: Shockah on April 01, 2012, 07:00:25 PM ---Well then there we have it, if you are capable of reviewing vip apps (which you've stated you are) then that seems like the most practical option to myself. My only concern would be a person gets 2 votes and because both of those votes are good they get approved which is why I believe there should still be a certain amount of votes required just lowered by 2 or so.
--- End quote ---
I see what you mean but at that point the 2 positive comments would have to be cumulatively convincing to prove the applicant's character.
And in the corner case where the promotion turns out to be a mistake the situation can easily be rectified with a demotion.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version