.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) > Discussion
[DICUSSION] New VIP Application Process
Shockah:
--- Quote from: coolzeldad on April 01, 2012, 07:04:27 PM ---I see what you mean but at that point the 2 positive comments would have to be cumulatively convincing to prove the applicant's character.
And in the corner case where the promotion turns out to be a mistake the situation can easily be rectified with a demotion.
--- End quote ---
Sounds good. Let's get this going soon please! While we can still use temp servers as a test.
Tezuni:
Suggestion for the VIP / Admin application process: Social Skills Assessment
Conflicts have arisen from purely lack of people skills in admins / vips.
Examples...
Spoiler (click to show/hide)1. The handling of Stone Cold's ban
2. Tech
3. Random promotions [from various admins]
4. Questionable Forum Censorship [not the server move misunderstanding]
Deacon:
--- Quote from: Tezuni on April 10, 2012, 07:00:34 PM ---1. The handling of Stone Cold's ban
What was wrong about how this was handled? Stone Cold did not listen to the banning admin, and got himself a permanent ban for doing so.
2. Tech
Yep
3. Random promotions [from various admins]
Is no longer a concern, that was during the temporary period in which they were technically allowed to do so.
4. Questionable Forum Censorship [not the server move misunderstanding]
What censorship?
--- End quote ---
Tezuni:
Point is i'd like that to be part of the criteria for applications, so that talking out problems becomes more common rather than letting it escalate as in the case of stone.
Deacon:
--- Quote from: Tezuni on April 10, 2012, 10:37:09 PM ---Point is i'd like that to be part of the criteria for applications, so that talking out problems becomes more common rather than letting it escalate as in the case of stone.
--- End quote ---
The only one that didn't talk anything out with stone is stone. He doesn't listen to anything we say, and still thinks we banned him because he is too good and because he cusses.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version