.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) > Discussion
[DICUSSION] New VIP Application Process
Sabb:
--- Quote from: memo3300 on March 31, 2012, 08:50:22 PM ---instead of having to reach x amount of votes, maybe you could have to reach x amount of plus ones, and the -1 rest the +1.
--- End quote ---
The way you worded that really doesn't make sense lol.
But I'm assuming you're saying to have -1 votes count against the +1 votes or something?
Not sure... but if that's what you're saying, that would only make it harder... everyone's trying to make it easier, not harder. Again... if that's what you're trying to say at least.
memo3300:
ya that was what i was trying to say.
But i mean, most of the people who didn't got it was because the amount of votes they needed to get was to high, not because they had -1's.
this way the people with enought +1 with no one with a reason of giving a -1 could get it.
Sabb:
--- Quote from: memo3300 on March 31, 2012, 09:14:49 PM ---ya that was what i was trying to say.
But i mean, most of the people who didn't got it was because the amount of votes they needed to get was to high, not because they had -1's.
this way the people with enought +1 with no one with a reason of giving a -1 could get it.
--- End quote ---
Lots of VIPs have overly biased opinions though, which shouldn't really account in their voting to -1 often. So, wouldn't be a good idea.
Juan_Ambriz:
I think the system should be like before.
BUT
(don't strike me down for my idea)
we should have an active approval (+1 or -1) list for both VIP's and Admins.
Because if it were only active admins there would only be like 3 or 4.
By active I mean like, active on the servers and who knows the players and such.
Tezuni:
I propose this:
1. Only active admins can vote
2. Three -1's = automatic rejection
3. Three +1's = approved
(Rule #2 applies instantly, rule #3 applies at the end of the two week application period)
Ex: 2 weeks later, there are TWO -1's, but THREE +1's, and it's approved.
Ex: 1 week later, a third -1 is posted and it's rejected.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version