.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) > Discussion
[DICUSSION] New VIP Application Process
Sabb:
--- Quote from: coolzeldad on March 31, 2012, 04:31:39 PM ---I'm not entirely satisfied with the current structure of the system.
I read every post in the thread... however I'm still thinking of what to go along with.
I'm also perfectly fine with checking the VIP apps say if Sabb's, or a derivative of his idea, was the applied system.
I have always kept up with 99% of the threads and posts during my activity and the matter of deciding a VIP through his process seems like a relatively seemless addition.
However, I'm still not sure what to say yet and I'll be sure to announce another dicussion, announcement, or both when I do find out what process I want to go with.
Please do keep discussing methods if you have ideas as they do help the thought process for alternative or a combination of ideas.
--- End quote ---
Well, I mean the old system before the temp servers. We could just revert back to that one, it had no problems really. We could just do that once the normal servers are back up, and keep applications down while the temp servers are up.
coolzeldad:
--- Quote from: Sabb on March 31, 2012, 04:49:42 PM ---Well, I mean the old system before the temp servers. We could just revert back to that one, it had no problems really. We could just do that once the normal servers are back up, and keep applications down while the temp servers are up.
--- End quote ---
I'm talking about that system specifically :o
Shockah:
The old system to me, did not seem very fair in the sense that the required number of votes was too high for who was active. To go further a good portion of our administration is inactive they may post here and there in the forums but you never see them in game, and if you do it definitely isn't on ttt (aside from sabb, jman, and recently snivy) so with so few admins actually active you have to get practically all of them to +! AND get SIX vip votes regardless of your personality and how often you play it's a little more then difficult to do so. I think if we revised the number of votes needed or perhaps allowed another vip vote not just 2 then that system would be effective, however I still prefer measuring the response by the content of those for and against and a board deciding upon it. Now that Coolz has said he'd be totally cool with looking over all vip apps that get to him I'm not opposed to sabbs revised version of the system and definitely prefer it over just reducing/making vip votes more meaningful. Whatever happens something needs to be changed.
Sabb:
--- Quote from: coolzeldad on March 31, 2012, 05:30:52 PM ---I'm talking about that system specifically :o
--- End quote ---
Oh lol, well I liked that system. The only BAD thing about it is the fact that 90% of the admins on the active approvers list were innactive.
But... simply to solve that, we could make it so that there is still an active approvers list (which would be about 5 people right now) but also count inactive admins' votes. That way, it's much more fair. Maybe counting the inactive admins' votes as a .5 or something would be best, but that's really the only problem with that.
memo3300:
instead of having to reach x amount of votes, maybe you could have to reach x amount of plus ones, and the -1 rest the +1.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version