Author Topic: Ban Request on G4M3R  (Read 620 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Shawn

  • Übermensch
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • Karma: +13/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • IGM: Shawn /Steam ID: Shawnchapp02
    • View Profile
Re: Ban Request on G4M3R
« Reply #15 on: July 20, 2010, 11:32:39 AM »
Wait, didn't we win that war?


Nope they won by closing Bostons port. so after reading all below please tell me what you won? You guys had to pay money to Britian for the tea you dumped... so all you did was spell tea... which you payed for Lol way to go..... WASTERS

In Boston, the arrival of three tea ships ignited a furious reaction. The crisis came to a head on December 16, 1773 when as many as 7,000 agitated locals milled about the wharf where the ships were docked. A mass meeting at the Old South Meeting House that morning resolved that the tea ships should leave the harbor without payment of any duty. A committee was selected to take this message to the Customs House to force release of the ships out of the harbor. The Collector of Customs refused to allow the ships to leave without payment of the duty. Stalemate. The committee reported back to the mass meeting and a howl erupted from the meeting hall. It was now early evening and a group of about 200 men, some disguised as Indians, assembled on a near-by hill. Whopping war chants, the crowd marched two-by-two to the wharf, descended upon the three ships and dumped their offending cargos of tea into the harbor waters.

Most colonists applauded the action while the reaction in London was swift and vehement. In March 1774 Parliament passed the Intolerable Acts which among other measures closed the Port of Boston.

The acta are:

The Boston Port Act, the first of the acts passed in response to the Boston Tea Party, closed the port of Boston until the East India Company had been repaid for the destroyed tea and until the king was satisfied that order had been restored. Colonists objected that the Port Act punished all of Boston rather than just the individuals who had destroyed the tea, and that they were being punished without having been given an opportunity to testify in their own defense.

The Massachusetts Government Act provoked even more outrage than the Port Act because it unilaterally altered the government of Massachusetts to bring it under control of the British government. Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were to be appointed by the governor or the king. The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament.

The Administration of Justice Act allowed the governor to move trials of accused royal officials to another colony or even to Great Britain if he believed the official could not get a fair trial in Massachusetts. Although the act stipulated that witnesses would be paid for their travel expenses, in practice few colonists could afford to leave their work and cross the ocean to testify in a trial. George Washington called this the "Murder Act" because he believed that it allowed British officials to harass Americans and then escape justice. Some colonists believed the act was unnecessary because British soldiers had been given a fair trial following the Boston Massacre in 1770, with future Founding Father John Adams representing the Defense.

The Quartering Act applied to all of the colonies, and sought to create a more effective method of housing British troops in America. In a previous act, the colonies had been required to provide housing for soldiers, but colonial legislatures had been uncooperative in doing so. The new Quartering Act allowed a governor to house soldiers in other buildings if suitable quarters were not provided. While many sources claim that the Quartering Act allowed troops to be billeted in occupied private homes, historian David Ammerman's 1974 study claimed that this is a myth, and that the act only permitted troops to be quartered in unoccupied buildings Although many colonists found the Quartering Act objectionable, it generated the least protest of the Coercive Acts.

« Last Edit: July 20, 2010, 12:10:54 PM by Shawn »
Any man who knows a thing knows
He knows not a damn, damn thing at all
And every time I felt the hurt
And I felt the givin' gettin' me up off the wall


Offline jimonions

  • All your mapping needs
  • Übermensch
  • *****
  • Posts: 901
  • Karma: +31/-10
  • Gender: Female
  • durp my name is JIM what is yours?
    • View Profile
Re: Ban Request on G4M3R
« Reply #16 on: July 20, 2010, 05:00:34 PM »
Well put, Brits do not want to be Aussie even tho they are just as awesome.

(Guest) combines is druck: IF I WAS AN ADMIN I WOULD BAN ONE OF YOU NOT ZOMBIES AND PUSH ME AS AN HUMAN I WILL

Offline Xrain

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
  • Karma: +6/-3
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Ban Request on G4M3R
« Reply #17 on: July 23, 2010, 02:48:19 PM »
Nice Post Shawn, but why don't you guys bring up arguments like this in general chat, not the reports section.