activision had some good games but it was just not worth buying them(accept CoD and other massive titles) and its is good that ubisoft has -1 "competition"

ubisoft is good well not realy they are just lucky they have all the tom clancy games :L but other then that there still prity sick.

wat

fucking nigger learn 2 edit or gtfo

I h8 activision for theses reasons: Greedy bastards
Mw2 is filled with hackterds
They ruined a great series.

ubisoft is good well not realy they are just lucky they have all the tom clancy games :L but other then that there still prity sick.

MY EYES.
THEY GOT RAPED.
Ubisoft has more than the Tom Clancy games, brain.
Ever heard of Anno or Siedler? : |

but on another totaly unrelated note cuz i had to edit and did not wana uber spam. this topic any one notice how popular bungie is and they dont have much games. u can see all there games on there sight if i recall its only like 5 or so well that was before like halo recon came out.

And once again, you blindly speak without knowing <3.
The amount of games doesn't define at ALL how GOOD a developer is. I rather have a developer that brings out a brililant game every fifth year than a developer recycling their old ideas each year. And, if you would know, Bungie didn't only work on Halo. I kindly remind you of the Marathon series (which you obviously never heard of). After all, Bungie developed 15 games by themselves. Halo is just the series that is known the most.

AND_THE_NAME_IS_HALO_3_:_O_D_S_T_IS_IT_SO_DAMN_DIFFICULT_TO_READ_A_STUPID_NAME_RIGHT_?_!