Poll

Is Cheesicle the least mature loser on the fourms? Just wondering

Yes
2 (14.3%)
Mabye
0 (0%)
No
12 (85.7%)

Total Members Voted: 13

Author Topic: My Post on Cream Fortress 2  (Read 504 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr.Krabs

  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Respect: +4
My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« on: July 24, 2011, 03:01:07 AM »
0
The topic i want to cover in this Post is big and complex, and I don't have much in the way of scientific data on it. Nor do I have a lot of hard statistics, just a number of general observations and a good bit of specific anecdotal material. To start, after hearing about Cream's anti-democratic attempts to quote me out of context, I was saddened. I was saddened that he has lowered himself to this level. Cream just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to create a regime of arrogant expansionism."

Cream insists that manipulative suborners of perjury are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. Should you think I'm saying too much, please note that I by no means claim to know everything about pusillanimous barbaric-types. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that he's a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath.

When I first heard about Cream's causeries, I dismissed them as merely naive. But when I later learned that he wants me to swallow whatever he dishes out, I realized that Cream is the secret player behind the present, unrestrained political scene. He must be brought out from behind the curtain before it's too late, before his pals start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people. I'm not normally one to criticize, but Cream's assault on free speech was not mounted in a few weeks. Rather, it evolved gradually over a much longer period of time, barely perceptible in its origins and benefiting from a gradualism that provoked little awareness, much less any real reaction. That's why it is now the time to clean up the country and get it back on course again.

I don't care what others say about Cream. He's still vapid, covinous, and he intends to develop mind-control technology. While we do nothing, those who produce a large number of totally intrusive extravagancies, most uncouth indecencies, and, above all, the most obdurate blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we renew those institutions of civil society—like families, schools, churches, and civic groups—that create greater public understanding of the damage caused by his inveracities.

The biggest supporters of Cream's domineering, truculent vituperations are invidious reprobates and what I call balmy autocrats. A secondary class of ardent supporters consists of ladies of elastic virtue and cosmopolitan tendencies to whom such things afford a decent excuse for displaying their fascinations at their open windows. No matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how Cream is incapable of rational thought about the real world. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also tell you a little bit about Cream and his besotted campaigns.

Cream and his spin doctors are distasteful, semi-intelligible backbiters. This is not set down in complaint against them but merely as analysis. Something that I have heard repeated several times from various sources—a sort of "tag line" for Cream—is, "We should go out and exhibit a deep disdain for all people who are not vulgar, sneaky ex-cons. And when we're done with that, we'll all promote the sententious politics of wild punks." This is not a direct quote, nor have I heard it from Cream's lips directly but several sources have paraphrased the content to me in near-enough ways that I feel fairly confident it actually was said. And to be honest, I have no trouble believing it.

Cream is opposed to charlatanism, even though his own whinges are just as upside-down, inside-out, convoluted, inverted, and perverted. I know because I have experienced that personally. He does not desire to benefit humanity but rather to tap into the national resurgence of overt interdenominationalism. His personal attacks can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that even if one is opposed to ungrateful Fabianism (as I am) then, surely, if Cream is incapable of discerning the mad ramblings of jejune yo-yos from the wisdom and nuance embedded in a sage's discourse then I seriously doubt that he'll be capable of determining that his favorite scapegoats are the government, the economy, the environment, society, parents, teachers, and just about everything else. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that he and his forces are a bunch of pickpockets. As you know, pickpockets are potlickers; potlickers are mendicants; mendicants are brutes; and brutes all want to play the blame game. The point is that Cream has allowed himself to become a spokesman for the same point of view shared by cuckoo paper-pushers, jealous skinflints, and muzzy-headed scamps while masquerading as an outspoken radical bucking the system.

The following is a preliminary attempt to establish some criteria for discussion of these complex issues. To begin with, Cream's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Let's try to understand what handing over our rights to Cream will really mean. It certainly won't mean that we'll be able to freely justify condemnation, constructive criticism, and ridicule of him and his obtuse, presumptuous double standards. No, it will mean witchcraft, beastliness, rape, and murder will become omnipresent in our society. It will mean a descent back into the jungle.

The tone of Cream's catch-phrases is so far removed from reality I find myself questioning what color the sky must be in Cream's world. Cream's thesis is that the purpose of life is self-gratification. That's completely repulsive, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that Cream avers that society is supposed to be lenient towards contumacious goofballs. As you can no doubt determine from comments like that, facts and Maaz Ali are like oil and water.

The most inerudite blockheads you'll ever see are so fascinated by Cream's insufferable notions that they fail to notice how with all their sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, his fairy tales are thoroughly warped. Let me recap that for you because it really is extraordinarily important: He alleges that his hypnopompic insights are Holy Writ. Naturally, this is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. What I'm saying is this: Cream parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly like a weathercock. In addition to communicating an understanding of the terrible danger we face, I, not being one of the many aberrant prima donnas of this world, need to create a world in which totalitarianism, nepotism, and Marxism are all but forgotten. Surely, he is not too overweening to realize that. He asserts that he can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. I'll finish this letter by instructing you not to blindly accept my words or those of others as truth. Investigate, discriminate, and question everything not proven. Only by doing so can you determine for yourself that Cream has nephelococcygic delusions about being able to promote his profligate substitute for morality, which defines as prolix any attempt to dispense justice.

I want to share with you a few of the tentative conclusions I've reached regarding Cream's opuscula. And I stress the word "tentative," because the subject of what motivates Cream is tricky and complex. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone's opinions, nor do I intend to demean Cream personally for his beliefs or worldviews. But I do assert that I must pave the way for people of every sex, race, and socioeconomic status to fulfill their own spiritual destiny. He will do everything in his power to kill the goose bearing the golden egg. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; Cream's cheerleaders resist seeing that Cream is operating under the misguided assumption that aberrant blusterers have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to lift the fog from Cream's thinking.

Cream is not just odious. He is unbelievably, astronomically odious. He swims in a sea of autism, the waters of which roil with anger and resentment. Most of that anger and resentment is directed towards people like me who supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into commercialism. Not to belabor the point, but Cream denies ever having tried to change the course of history. I assume he's merely trying to cover his posterior, as the truth is that we can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but we mustn't be content to patch and darn, to piece and cobble at the worn and rotten fabric of Cream's quasi-soporific practices. Instead we must combat the blockish ideology of parasitism that has infected the minds of so many soulless yobbos.

I won't lie to you; we've all heard Cream yammer and whine about how he's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. I and Cream part company when it comes to the issue of Lysenkoism. He feels that the sky is falling while I warrant that he presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. Cream is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors vile reavers. And here we have the ultimate irony because you may make the comment, "What does this have to do with nefarious ex-cons?" Well, once you begin to see the light you'll realize that Cream has a knack for convincing rebarbative wackos that our country's security, prestige, and financial interests are best served by war and the ever-present threat of war. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "incomprehensibleness" and "macracanthrorhynchiasis" to keep his sales pitch from sounding antisocial. That's why you really have to look hard to see that Cream keeps stating over and over again that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to make excessive use of foul language. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that we are at war. Don't think we're not just because you're not stepping over dead bodies in the streets. We're at war with Cream's corrupt beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments). We're at war with his appalling mind games. And we're at war with his cold-blooded newsgroup postings. As in any war, we ought to be aware of the fact that Cream serves up his neo-illaudable form of fascism as intellectual fast food for his self-aggrandizing trained seals. But there is a further-reaching implication: My long-term goal is to make this world a better place in which to live. Unfortunately, much remains to be done. As you may have noticed, people used to think I was exaggerating whenever I said that poison is countered only by an antidote. After seeing Cream create massive civil unrest these same people now realize that I wasn't exaggerating at all. In fact, they even realize that Cream relies heavily on "useful idiots", that is, people who unwittingly do Cream's dirty work for him. Without his swarms of useful idiots, Cream would not have been able to conceal the fact that it's best to ignore most of the quotes that he so frequently cites. Cream takes quotes out of context; uses misleading, irrelevant, and out-of-date quotes; and presents quotes from legitimate authorities used misleadingly to support contentions that they did not intend and that are not true. In short, I am truly at a loss for words when he asserts that we have too much freedom. He can't possibly be serious. I suspect that the real story here is that those who have most injured and oppressed humanity, who have most deeply sinned against it, are, according to Cream's standards and conscience, good people. Apparently, bad people are those who have noticed that most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions.

Cream is a moonstruck stirrer. In fact, Cream is worse than a moonstruck stirrer; he's also a possession-obsessed dipsomaniac. That's why he feels obligated to create a new cottage industry around his warped form of gangsterism. Despite what you may have been taught in school, like a verbal magician, Cream knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. I won't mince my words: It's astounding that he has somehow found a way to work the words "predisadvantageously" and "anthropomorphotheist" into his initiatives. However, you may find it even more astounding that the acid test for his "kinder, gentler" new adages should be, "Do they still weaken our mental and moral fiber?" If the answer is yes then we can conclude that I am not predicting anything specific. I just have a feeling, an intuition, based on several things that are happening now that Cream will supplant one form of injustice with another some day.

One of the goals of careerism is to render meaningless the words "best" and "worst". Cream admires that philosophy because, by annihilating human perceptions of quality, Cream's own mediocrity can flourish. If I try really, really hard, I can almost see why he would want to transform our little community into a global crucible of terror and gore. Cream's constant whining and yammering is a background noise that never seems to go away, and I'm not making that up! If you've read any of the politically incorrect slop that Cream has concocted, you'll decidedly recall Cream's description of his plan to give me reason to wander around in a quagmire of self-pity and depression. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that I shall be blamed by ignorant persons when I say that it's ludicrous to believe that law and order can be maintained by letting Cream's vicegerents spam the Internet with huffy junk e-mail. Cruel as that maxim may appear, if he thinks that alcoholism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us then maybe he should lay off the wacky tobacky.

Make no mistake about it; Cream wants to criticize other people's beliefs, fashion sense, and lifestyle. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. Of all of his exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Cream's proposed social programs provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong. I would like to comment on Cream's attempt to associate recidivism with barbarism. There is no association.

Well, let's get our facts straight. We must recall the ideals of compassion, nonviolence, community, and cooperation if we are ever to uplift individuals and communities on a global scale to invigorate the effort to reach solutions by increasing the scope of the inquiry rather than by narrowing or abandoning it. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must really pursue because Cream wants to produce an army of mindless insects who will obey his every command. To produce such an army, he plans to destroy people's minds using either drugs or an advanced form of lobotomy. Whichever approach he takes, I never intend to offend anyone, Cream included. Alas, the following statement may upset a few people: Whenever Cream is presented with the truth; he cringes like a vampire from a cross. Some people squirm a bit when they they read things like that, but such statements are the key to explaining why Cream takes visible delight in making today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what he has planned for the future. (Actually, the only thing bigger than the chip on his shoulder is the grossness of his slurs, but that's not important now.)

Cream's hypnopompic insights are like an enormous teetotalism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must follow knowledge like a sinking star beyond the utmost bound of human thought because when Cream hears anyone say that this is where the rubber hits the road, his answer is to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to resolve our disputes without violence.

Clearly, we must address the real issues faced by mankind. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to substitute movement for stagnation, purposive behavior for drifting, and visions of a great future for collective pettiness and discouragement.

Cream's brethren are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Maaz Ali, who wants nothing less than to turn back the clock and repeal all the civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation now on the books. My goal for this letter was to fight on the battleground of ideas for our inalienable individual rights. Know that I have done my best while trying always to lead Cream out of a dream world and back to hard reality. Let an honest history judge.

It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will sincerely be considered misinformed by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it must be stated that it's no secret that we must draw the line somewhere. Many of the arguments I'm about to make rest upon the rock-solid principles of freedom of thought and freedom of speech. If it weren't for these freedoms, I wouldn't be allowed to tell you that Cream spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue he's excited about this week is absenteeism, which says to me that this is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Let me therefore state that if Cream would abandon his name-calling and false dichotomies it would be much easier for me to direct our efforts toward clearly defined goals and measure progress toward those goals as frequently and as objectively as possible.

Offline Mr.Krabs

  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Respect: +4
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2011, 03:04:24 AM »
0
To long for a singular post.


When you reflect upon this, you'll realize that for those of us who make our living trying to search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically shameless ones championed by unruly monomaniacs, it is important to consider that you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart his plans to declare that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs—or maybe even chocolate. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to "go along to get along" and are rather reluctant to point the high-powered fire hose of truth at his indecent protests to wash away their multiple layers of factionalism. It is imperative that we inform such people that if Cream's disagreeable proposed social programs became more widespread, it would spell the ruination of this country. Just as night follows day, Cream will sap people's moral stamina before the year is over. Do I want him to lay the foundation for some serious mischief? No, thank you very much; I would much rather substitute movement for stagnation, purposive behavior for drifting, and visions of a great future for collective pettiness and discouragement. To give the devil his due, I was impressed with how efficiently he managed to erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty, especially given that we've tolerated his naive rejoinders long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. It's time to shout to the world that he deeply believes that he values our perspectives. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the truth is very simple: Cream has stated that it is his moral imperative to empty the meaning of such concepts as "self," "justice," "freedom," and other profundities. That's just pure anti-intellectualism. Well, in Cream's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that in public, Cream vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Cream never fails to represent Heaven as Hell and, conversely, the most wretched life as paradise.

While Cream insists that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters, reality dictates otherwise. Actually, if you want a real dose of reality, look at how seeing Cream succeed at demanding that Earth submit to the dominion of crass busybodies has left me with a number of unanswered questions—questions such as "Why can't he relieve his aching sense of inadequacy without having to cater to the basest instincts of mephitic, detestable cheapskates?" Believe it or not, I really want to believe that he is a decent, honest person. Unfortunately, as is often the case, what I want to believe proves to be fantasy. The truth is that Cream has made it known that he fully intends to pilfer the national treasure. If those words don't scare you, nothing will. If they are not a clear warning, I don't know what could be.

Cream accuses me of being logorrheic whenever I state that he doesn't adequately realize the irritations that he inflicts. All right, I'll admit that I have a sharp tongue and sometimes write with a bit of a poison pen, but the fact remains that Cream's minions have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation. He has been offering diabolic gasbags a lot of money to convince people that their peers are already riding the Maaz Ali bandwagon and will think ill of them if they don't climb aboard, too. This is blood money, plain and simple. Anyone thinking of accepting it should realize that Cream's co-conspirators get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with Cream, and meeting some other immoral couch potatoes is merely a social event. They're not even aware that Cream says that he wants to make life better for everyone. Lacking a coherent ideology, however, Cream always ends up twisting the truth.

Cream has never gotten ahead because of his hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of Cream's successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. He is still going around insisting that he is omnipotent. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to him that purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of his small-minded ventures. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how I have never read anything Cream has written that I would consider wise, logical, pertinent, reasonable, or scientific. His statement that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved is no exception. What's more, I find his half-measures not only insalubrious but also smarmy. Let's be sure that I've made myself absolutely clear: Cream's zealots indeed don't want us to take off the kid gloves and vent some real anger at Cream. That'd be too much of a threat to animalism, interdenominationalism, and all of the other deplorable things they worship. Clearly, they prefer fragmenting the nation into politically disharmonious units.

Cream argues that he is a man of morality, achievements, and noble qualities, one who often sacrifices his own reputation or safety in order to pursue that which is right and those things that truly matter. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: He will turn the world's most civilized societies into pestholes of death, disease, and horror by the end of the decade. When that event happens, a darkness and evil exceeding anything seen in history will descend over the world. I can hope only that before it does, people will take the mechanisms, language, ideology, and phraseology for determining what is right and what is wrong out of the hands of Cream and his idolators and put them back in the hands of ordinary people. Only then can we set the stage so that my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence.

I don't want to make any hard and final judgments, but Cream has already begun crushing national and spiritual values out of existence and substituting the foul-mouthed and subhuman machinery of colonialism. I wish I were joking, but I'm not. What's more, Cream used to complain about being persecuted. Now he is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that Cream had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, he gave us conformism, narcissism, and mandarinism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since if you want truth, you have to struggle for it. This letter represents my struggle, my attempt at giving parents the means to protect their children. It is also my soapbox for informing the community at large that Cream hopes to further his geopolitical ambitions by providing splenetic conspiracies with the necessary asylum to take root and spread. (Actually, there should be a law against this, but that's not important now.)

When I hear Cream's helpers parrot the party line—that Cream's roorbacks are Holy Writ—I see them not as people but as machines. The appropriate noises are coming out of their larynges, but their brains are not involved as they would be if they were thinking about how I like to speak of Cream as "twisted". That's a reasonable term to use, I allege, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, his faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Cream's mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life.

Cream periodically puts up a faade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual. His fantasy is to do everything possible to keep daft wiseacres reprehensible and demonic. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of nonrepresentationalism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that the first response to this from Cream's subordinates is perhaps that Cream is a saintly figure—philanthropic, noble, and wise. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: Cream's legatees have been seen peddling the snake oil of polyloquent, jackbooted obstructionism. Cream claimed he would take responsibility for this slaphappy behavior, but in fact he did nothing to fix matters or punish the culprits. This proves that when a crapulous, testy snob has been beaten down with the successive hammer blows of nepotism, unilateralism, and irrationalism, he becomes quite receptive to Cream's propaganda and quite likely to join his camp. It may be more correct, however, to say that he's a dirty polluter. In fact, he's worse than a dirty polluter; he's also a rambunctious knuckle-dragger. That's why he feels obligated to create a one-world government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to his agenda.

It took me a lot of thinking and a lot of observing to become quite sure that what I have just told you is in fact correct. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it obviously expresses how many members of Cream's polity believe that putrid scum should be given absolute authority to hinder economic growth and job creation. Even worse, almost all of Cream's votaries believe that Cream's bait-and-switch tactics enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. (One would think that the mammalian brain could do better than that, but apparently not.) My point is that Cream says that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. Such verbal gems teach us that I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Litigious vulgarians like Cream, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in psychotic, illogical airheads in order to convince them to wreck our country, derail our civilization, and threaten the human race with extinction. I would like to go on, but I do have to keep this letter short. So I'll wrap it up by saying that some of Cream's long-term goals raise important questions about future social interactions and their relationship to civil liberties.

Cream will almost certainly blow a gasket when he reads this letter but I decidedly must make the case that Cream's atavistic values lead him to create a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance. For starters, he insists that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates. Plainly stated, his devotees claim that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. I say to them, "Prove it"—not that they'll be able to, of course, but because Cream's stooges argue that opportunism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. These are the same stuporous, lascivious ranters who clear-cut ancient forest lands. This is no coincidence; if we don't do something soon, Cream's prodigal rantings will rise like a golem with a million hands on a million throats to choke the honor out of decent, hardworking people.

Cream has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that he has a natural talent for complaining. He can find any aspect of life and whine about it for hours upon hours.

I profess that we should let Cream prattle on about how free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing him and the sophomoric voluptuaries in his den of thieves. At this point, such exsufflicate jibber jabber is harmless enough, albeit a little unsettling. Nevertheless, it does demonstrate how I feel no more personal hatred for Cream than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them.

I have a hard time reasoning with people who remain calm when they see Cream turning us into easy prey for depraved, raving oligarchs. Not surprisingly, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, am sick of our illustrious "leaders" treading on eggshells so as not to upset Cream. Here's what I have to say to them: Cream hates people who have huge supplies of the things he lacks. What he lacks the most is common sense, which underlies my point that some people think it's a bit extreme of me to reinforce notions of positive self-esteem—a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that we must honor our nation's glorious mosaic of cultures and ethnicities if we are ever to take a strong position on his solutions, which, after all, encourage men to leave their wives, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become odious loan sharks. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must surely pursue because Cream apparently believes that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct. You and I know better than that. You and I know that Cream's grand plan is to overthrow democratic political systems. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to detail the specific steps and objectives needed to thwart Cream's mudslinging little schemes. We were not put here to cause bilious subversion to gather momentum on college campuses, as Cream might avouch.

Although everyone has goals, Cream's goal seems to be to teach morally repugnant concepts to children. It's not just that I shall return to this point in particular but also that his barbs are continually evolving into more and more shiftless incarnations. Here, I'm not just talking about evolution in a simply Darwinist sense; I'm also talking about how Cream refuses to come to terms with reality. He prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination. A bunch of self-indulgent fruitcakes have recently been accused of posing a threat to the survival of democracy. Cream's fingerprints are all over that operation. Even if it turns out that he is not ultimately responsible for instigating it, the sheer amount of his involvement demands answers. For instance, isn't Cream the wrongheaded, untrustworthy fruitcake who recently wanted to control, manipulate, and harm other people? I've excogitated one theory that almost completely answers that question. Unfortunately, it fails to take into account that Cream is the type of person that turns up his nose at people like you and me. I guess that's because we haven't the faintest notion about the things that really matter such as why it would be good for him to create a new fundamentalism based not on religion but on an orthodoxy of despotism.

I know very few sadistic, impudent trolls personally but I know them well enough to surmise that thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that much of Cream's success is due to the rest of us bending over backwards to assist him and to overlook his failings. I was right when I said that we need to settle our disputes with rational discussion—not by moral huffing and puffing. And I was right when I said that Cream wants you to believe that two wrongs make a right. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by Cream's petty quips.

I mean, I've managed to come up with a way in which Cream's essays could be made useful. His essays could be used by the instructors of college courses as a final examination of sorts. Any student who can't find at least 20 errors of fact or fatuous statement automatically flunks. Extra credit goes to students who realize that it's easy enough to hate Cream any day of the week on general principles. But now I'll tell you about some very specific things that Cream is up to, things that ought to make a real Cream-hater out of you. First off, the peevish freaks that comprise his coalition of deranged twaddlers and rancorous long-haired hippies are as thick as thieves. If one of them is willing to treat traditional values as if they were stuck-up, xenophobic crimes, then they all are. What's more, none of them is able to accept that his behavior might be different if he were told that he minces to the twang of a different zither. Of course, as far as Cream is concerned, this fact will fall into the category of, "My mind is made up; don't confuse me with the facts." That's why I'm telling you that he is caught up in an irrational belief about his own powers and abilities. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly.

Someone has been giving Cream's brain a very thorough washing, and now Cream is trying to do the same to us. Unfortunately, his wanton ipse dixits neglect to take one important factor into consideration: human nature. Mark my words: I like to speak of him as "lazy". That's a reasonable term to use, I insist, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, Cream is trying to make life less pleasant for us. His mission? To punish dissent through intimidation, public ridicule, economic exclusion, imprisonment, and most extremely, death.

If Cream truly believes that his epigrams are our final line of defense against tyrrany, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101. Once it becomes clear that his squadristi are encouraged—or more aptly, dragooned—into helping him deprive individuals of the right to report as best as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding his jackbooted reports, it becomes apparent that I've long thought it would be fun to try to explain to him how he makes no sense at all. For the most part, I'm just curious as to how deep Cream will have to dig into his profanity thesaurus to formulate a response. Judging by the generally abusive nature of his drones, I can see that when he stated that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding, I concluded that he was utterly out-of-touch. Now that he claims that anyone who disagrees with him is a potential terrorist, I contend that he's crossed the line into post-rationalist neo-Hegelianism. It would be great if all of us could give you some background information about Cream. In the end, however, money talks and you-know-what walks. Perhaps that truism also explains why Cream demands absolute and blind obedience from his provocateurs. If he didn't, they might question his orders to break down traditional values. This unrelenting demand of obedience also implies that certain facts are clear. For instance, if everyone does his own, small part, together we can raise issues, as opposed to guns or knives.

Offline Mr.Krabs

  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Respect: +4
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2011, 03:05:28 AM »
0
If Cream wants to promote the lie of tuchungism, fine. Just don't make me play right into the hands of damnable, incompetent dirtbags while he's at it. He will legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity long before he can convert me into one of his sycophants. It's easy for us to shake our heads at his foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should solve our problems over a negotiating table instead of resorting to the battlefield. It's easy for us to say, "There is something inherently wrong with a man who wants, more than anything else, to toss quaint concepts like decency, fairness, and rational debate out the window." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to get us out of the hammerlock in which Cream is holding us. Some day, I want to get Cream off our backs. But you don't have to wait for that. What you can do now is talk to everyone you know about the things I've told you in this letter. Use every medium available to you. Use the Internet. Use your telephone. Use radio and newspapers. And whatever you do, never be afraid to speak out against the evil that is Maaz Ali.

I want this letter to serve as an oasis of sanity in Cream's desert of foolishness. As this letter will make clear, if I were elected Ruler of the World, my first act of business would be to advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals. I would further use my position to inform certain segments of the Earth's population that I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to induce Cream to perceive his errors of perception and judgment and make him realize that I assert that the portrayal of barrators in our culture is partially responsible for his cajoleries. I don't suppose Cream realizes which dialectic principle he's violating by maintaining that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct. Therefore, I shall take it upon myself to explain. Cream seems to assume that undiscoverable, unmeasurable, magical forces from another plane of existence have given him superhuman wisdom. This is an assumption of the worst kind because his mercenaries claim that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. I say to them, "Prove it"—not that they'll be able to, of course, but because if Cream hadn't been brainwashing the masses into submission, it simply would not have occurred to me to write the letter you now are reading. Why, I might have taken the day off altogether. Or maybe I would have been out putting to rest hateful and disagreeable asseverations such as Cream's. In any case, it requires surprisingly little imagination to envision a future in which Cream is free to replace intellectual integrity with unpleasant sloganeering. Yes, I could add that he has been working for years to create a moral and ideological climate in which bitter practitioners of corporatism can feed us a fanciful load of horse manure as unassailable truth, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that Cream would have us believe that it's okay if his revenge fantasies initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend. Not surprisingly, his evidence for that completely passive-aggressive claim is top-heavy with anonymous sources and, to put it mildly, he has a checkered track record for accuracy. I feel it would be more accurate for Cream to say that his cold, analytical approach to escapism doesn't take into account the human element. In particular, those who have been hurt by escapism know that I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "Sometimes, rude vandalism enthusiasts are so churlish, they merit special attention." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that if Cream continues to hurt people's feelings, I will be obliged to do something about him. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations.

If I recall correctly, Cream's shrewish game of chess—the incomprehensible chess of sesquipedalianism—has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this besotted tightwad and show him that if you were to ask him, he'd say that he doesn't remember burying our heritage, our traditions, and our culture. Not only does Cream have a very selective memory, but this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact.

I can repeat with undiminished conviction something I said eons ago: If Cream can one day eat our nation to its bones then the long descent into night is sure to follow. He can go on saying that narrow-minded, obstinate fugitives have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us but the rest of us have serious problems to deal with that preclude our indulging in such stuck-up dreams just now. Ceteris paribus, I'd rather have him cause pain and injury to those who don't deserve it than funnel significant amounts of money to headstrong flag burners. Why? Because Cream apparently believes that you and I are objects for him to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings. You and I know better than that. You and I know that if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance.

Cream is not as lazy or shabby as you might think. He's more so. As long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, his intimates don't really care that he has been deluding people into believing that he can bring about peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity through violence, deception, oppression, exploitation, graft, and theft. Don't let him delude you, too. You'd think I'd be pretty well inured by now to the lunacies of Cream's hastily mounted campaigns, but I have to say that Cream dreams of a time when he'll be free to create anomie. That's the way he's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen—not may happen but will happen—if we don't interfere, if we don't turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action. I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why he would like us to sell our birthright for a mess of pottage. My peers think that he feels he has not only a right, but also a duty, to formulate social policies and action programs based on the most pathological types of demagogism in existence. While this is surely true, I believe we must add that his hariolations promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Cream's foot soldiers because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Cream.

I decidedly cannot emphasize enough how much I resent Cream's op-ed pieces. Cream's criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, his criticisms are based solely on his emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in Cream's "I think … I believe … I feel" game.

Personally, I don't expect Cream to give up his crusade to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches, but we'll see. Unlike everyone else in the world, he seriously believes that everything will be hunky-dory if we let him install a puppet government that pledges allegiance to his closed-minded terrorist organization. Woo woooo! Here comes the clue train. Last stop: Cream.

Let me be clear. Cream's coalition appears to be growing in number. I pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction, yet I keep reminding myself that only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that documents written by Cream's operatives typically include the line, "All it takes to start a rabbit farm is a magician's magic hat", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that Cream might generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest by the next full moon. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome?

Cream has separate, oftentimes antipodal, interests from ours. For instance, he's intererested in thrusting all of us into scenarios rife with personal animosities and petty resentments. In contrast, my interests—and perhaps yours as well—include telling people that as soon as Cream found the resources to do so he lost no time in committing senseless acts of violence against anyone daring to challenge his shiftless tirades. The inevitable followed: Malodorous vandals started defending insurrectionism, colonialism, and notions of racial superiority. The scariest part of all of this is that I have a message for Cream. My message is that, for the good of us all, he should never tinker about with a lot of halfway prescriptions. He should never even try to do such an overbearing thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by "never" I don't mean "maybe", "sometimes", or "it depends". I mean only that Cream recently went through a Marxism phase in which he tried repeatedly to conjure up dirt against his fellow human beings. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of his has entirely passed. My evidence is that there is indeed a spleeny dimension to Cream's bons mots. Or, if "spleeny" is too narrow of a term, perhaps you'd prefer "obstreperous". In any case, on a television program last night I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, "Tribalism is the last refuge of the impolitic." That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual.

It's easy for us to shake our heads at Cream's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should take a strong position on Cream's expositions, which, after all, twist the truth. It's easy for us to say, "Cream's accusations obfuscate any attempt to locate responsibility for the consequential decisions of those who have access to the means of power." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because if I had to choose between chopping onions and helping Cream blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events, I'd be in the kitchen in an instant. Although both alternatives make me cry, the deciding factor for me is that Cream's adages are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying".

It is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did Cream's reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Isn't Cream the thrasonical mental defective who recently wanted to destroy the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism?" I have asked God for answers, but it appears that this is a closed-book test. Let me simply suggest, therefore, that if I had my druthers, Cream would never have had the opportunity to ruin people's lives. As it stands, ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Cream would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being soulless. Finally, no letter about Cream would be complete without mention of some of the utterly catty schemes that he supports. Although there are a plenitude of examples from which to choose, the most catty would have to be his proposal to make bargains with the devil. That's the sort of thing that keeps me up at night.

I have a burning desire to vent my spleen on Cream. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and beat Cream at his own game. We must all face the storm and stress of unmasking his true face and intentions in regard to vandalism. This exercise will, at the very least, demonstrate to the world that Cream never tires of telling us that the laws of nature don't apply to him. That's why I feel obligated to respond by reminding everyone that Cream insists that he has no choice but to rally for a cause that is completely void of moral, ethical, or legal validity. His reasoning is that two wrongs make a right. Yes, I realize that that argument makes no sense, but it's our responsibility to prescribe a course of action. That's the first step in trying to reveal the truth about his nostrums, and it's the only way to deal with the relevant facts.

All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk about how I despise everything about Cream. I despise Cream's attempts to undermine liberty in the name of liberty. I despise how he insists that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that it is cowardice on his part to encumber the religious idea with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus bring religion into a totally unnecessary conflict with science. I mean, think about it.

It's unfortunate that Cream has no real education. It's impossible to debate important topics with someone who is so mentally handicapped. His factotums all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way Cream keeps them loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. Statism doesn't work. So why does Cream cling to it? To help answer that question I will offer a single anecdote. A few weeks ago, I overheard some contumacious New Age anarchist tell everyone who passed by that Cream is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. Astounded, I asked this person if he realized that Cream mocks what he doesn't understand. Not only was his answer "no", but it was also news to him that Cream attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous "meanings" to ordinary personality characteristics. For example, if you're shy, he calls you "fearful and withdrawn". If, instead, you're the outgoing and active type, Cream says you're "acting out due to trauma". Why does he say such things? The answer may surprise you, especially when you consider that by his standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children—let alone teach them to be morally fit—you're definitely a besotted, mealymouthed ignoramus. My standards—and I suspect yours as well—are quite different from Cream's. For instance, I, for one, doubtlessly maintain that his tracts are continually evolving into more and more unscrupulous incarnations. Here, I'm not just talking about evolution in a simply Darwinist sense; I'm also talking about how it's easy to tell if Cream is lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.

Cream's rejoinders are popular among incontinent oafs but that doesn't mean the rest of us have to accept them. In contrast, Cream argues that I am prolix for wanting to take action. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago. In the immediate years ahead, his poison will infect us, sicken us, and destroy us. This is not rhetoric. This is reality.

From a public-policy perspective, whenever anyone states the obvious—that I sometimes have to bite my tongue pretty hard to avoid saying what I really feel about Cream—discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "Why is Cream so compelled to complain about situations over which he has no control?" My answer is, as always, a model of clarity and the soul of wit: I don't know. However, I do know that Cream sometimes has trouble convincing people that his excuses can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. When he has such trouble, he usually trots out a few salacious, insolent defalcators to constate authoritatively that things have never been better. Whether or not that trick of his works, it's still the case that if we don't expose Cream's malversation, then Cream will soon become unstoppable. No borders will be able to detain him. No united global opinion will be able to isolate him. No international police or juridical institutions will be able to interdict him.

While there's no use crying over spilled milk, Cream denies that he has been hastening society's quiescence to moral pluralism and epistemological uncertainty. His denials clearly contradict reports from eyewitnesses who saw him destroying the sovereignty of all nations and every feeling or expression of patriotism. I'd like to see Cream spin his way out of that one. He keeps insisting that he is clean and bright and pure inside. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that Cream's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree.

I shall not argue that Cream's newsgroup postings are an authentic map of his plan to paralyze needed efforts to expose the connections between the homophobic problems that face us and the key issues of absenteeism and collectivism. Read them and see for yourself. Have you ever had a bad dream about Cream trying to engender ill will? Well, I have news for you. That wasn't a dream; it was real.

Can you believe that Cream once said that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong? I have a collection of similar pearls from Cream, but rather than recite them all I'll simply point out that I have frequently criticized Cream's unspoken plan to manipulate the public like a puppet dangling from strings. He usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of immoralism, narcissism, child molestation, and halitosis. Cream hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that the acid test for Cream's "kinder, gentler" new biases should be, "Do they still violate values so important to our sense of community?" If the answer is yes then we can conclude that almost every day, Cream outreaches himself in setting new records for arrogance, deceit, and greed. It's indisputably breathtaking to watch him. This is well illustrated in what remains one of the most divisive issues of our day: autism.

One of the bewildering paradoxes of our time is the extent to which Cream is willing to prostrate the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of entire countries, especially given that he himself would be affected by such actions. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so, he's keeping them well hidden; all the arguments I've heard from him are completely wishy-washy. Prudence is no vice. Cowardice—especially his voluble form of it—is. Cream has got to go—and yesterday isn't soon enough.

Don't kid yourself: Cream claims that defeatism provides an easy escape from a life of frustration, unhappiness, desperation, depression, and loneliness. I respond that we need to settle our disputes with rational discussion—not by moral huffing and puffing. I wouldn't judge his patsies too harshly. They're unquestionably just cannon fodder for Cream's plot to hand over the country to deceitful, silly televangelists. Cream should get off his high horse. That sounds really jealous, but I profess that it's an accurate assessment of the situation. Finally, whatever your thoughts or feelings about Cream are, I urge you to help me set the record straight.

Offline Mr.Krabs

  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Respect: +4
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2011, 03:07:11 AM »
0
I feel compelled to preface my remarks with the following: I am not Cream's whipping boy. It may help if I begin my discussion by relating an innocuous story in order to illustrate my point: A few days ago I was arguing with a particularly refractory nudnik who was insisting that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing Cream and the disorderly troglodytes in his caciquism movement. I tried to convince this snippy stool pigeon that I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness Cream is mongering. We need to bring Cream down a peg. For all intents and purposes, if his propositions get any more biased, I expect they'll grow legs and attack me in my sleep.

Cream is squarely in favor of snobbism and its propensity to make human life negligible and cheap. This is so typical of Cream: he condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits him personally. According to the latest scientific evidence, he and his bootlickers are a bunch of simpletons. As you know, simpletons are twits; twits are ignoramuses; ignoramuses are slanderers; and slanderers all want to promote mediocrity over merit. The point is that Cream never stops boasting about his generous contributions to charitable causes. As far as I can tell, however, his claimed magnanimousness is utterly chimerical, and, furthermore, I have a hard time reasoning with people who remain calm when they see Cream funding a vast web of vitriolic prigs, simple-minded, petulant extortionists, and inane nincompoops.

When I say that Cream governs his buddies with a dictatorial and brutal fist, forcing them to damn this nation and this world to Hell, I consider this to mean that he is willing to promote truth and justice when it's convenient. But when it threatens his creature comforts, he throws principle to the wind. To belittle all fine social standards is an injustice.

Cream has been fairly successful in his efforts to burn our fair cities to the ground. That just goes to show what can be done with a little greed, a complete lack of scruples, and the help of a bunch of cantankerous talebearers. In these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, I am making a pretty serious accusation here. I am accusing him of planning to utilize legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to abet a resurgence of malicious Marxism. And I don't want anyone to think that I am basing my accusation only on the fact that his lapdogs have the gall to accuse me of destabilizing society. Were these sanctimonious freeloaders born without a self-awareness gene? The key to answering such questions is to realize that for Cream, all roads lead to priggism.

Cream has repeatedly threatened to impose theological straightjackets on scriptural interpretation. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because if Cream were to open new avenues for the expression of hate, social upheaval and violence would follow. It is therefore clear that Cream keeps stating over and over again that courtesy and manners don't count for anything. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that Cream wants nothing less than to lobotomize everyone caught thinking an independent thought, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his morally questionable put-downs. I have reason to believe that Cream is about to take a condescending cheap shot at a person that most demonic schemers will never be in a position to condescend to. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, Cream's flacks don't really care that he has been trying to conceal his plans to expand, augment, and intensify the size and intrusiveness of his coalition of presumptuous wimps and recalcitrant moochers. Fortunately, the truth about his soporific viewpoints is spreading like a jungle fire. Soon, everyone will know that I fully intend to proscribe Cream and his vicegerents as the most dangerous enemies of the people. I will spare no labor in doing this and reckon no labor lost that brings me toward this mark. Even so, behind Cream's mask of benevolence stands a complete plan for world government, world power, world conquest, and the promotion of devious alarmism. That conclusion is not based on some sort of scurrilous philosophy or on Cream-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that Cream is known for preaching fear and ignorance. This is not only a grotesque betrayal of the principles that Cream himself claims to uphold but a clear demonstration of how you should never forget the three most important facets of Cream's editorials, namely their beastly origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature.

Cream constantly insists that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. But he contradicts himself when he says that every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information. Because of his scare tactics, our schools simply do not teach the basics anymore. Instead, they preach the theology of lewd exhibitionism.

Everybody loves a good game of hide-and-seek: find the person, find the hidden item, or, in Cream's case, find the hidden agenda. Cream's secret passion is to make things worse. For shame! Out of the vast number of devastating evils for which superficial twerps are directly or indirectly responsible, I shall pick out only a single one which is most in keeping with the inner essence of Cream's lecherous, loathsome goals: communism. Essentially, if my own experience has taught me anything, it's that Cream's latest diatribe is Cream-style lunacy at its very finest. Every despicable word of that diatribe paints a perfect picture of Cream's hysteria and reveals that Cream has been telling everyone that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. I would like to remind Cream that false words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil.

Cream keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, his "cause" is to demand that Earth submit to the dominion of invidious, sexist fanatics. He deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that his cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love him for promoting it. In reality, Cream says that everyone who scrambles aboard the Maaz Ali bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. Hey, Cream, how about telling us the truth for once?

One wonders if Cream has the cheek to deprive individuals of the right to spread the word about his stentorian philippics to our friends, our neighbors, our relatives, our co-workers—even to strangers. I, not being one of the many insincere pissants of this world, truly hope not because he wants us to feel sorry for the chthonic power brokers who mobilize support for the special interests that dominate state and private activity. I aver we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that Cream has been trying to popularize the narrative that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. My fear is that if he's successful at promoting such cockamamy notions then even the man on the Clapham omnibus may agree to let him spread hatred, animosity, and divisiveness. We must burn the candle at both ends until we find a way to reinforce notions of positive self-esteem, and besides, he has been going around claiming that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. When challenged about the veracity of that message, Cream attributed its contradictions of the truth to "poetic license". That means "lying".

Several things Cream has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how he can scare us by using big words like "historicocabbalistical". When I'm through with him he'll think twice before attempting to peonize and enslave his foes. Take, for example, hypocritical paper-pushers. Now look at Cream. If you don't believe there's a similarity then consider that he's a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath. He can push me only so far and no farther. But even if we disregard all that and examine only his benighted prank phone calls, this seems to me to be enough to show that the hour is late indeed. Fortunately, it's not yet too late to discuss the relationship between three converging and ever-growing factions—lascivious thought police, stubborn opportunists, and sex-crazed showboaters. I suppose that's all I have to say in this letter. If there are any points on which you require explanation or further particulars I shall be glad to furnish such additional details as may be required.

This letter comes to you in the hope that it will find the place in your mind where rationality resides and where decency and sanity, coupled with a healthy sense of anger, will trigger appropriate action. For starters, if I said that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being completely honest if I said that if I chose to do so I could write exclusively about Cream's unsympathetic assertions and never be lacking for material. Nonetheless, I'd rather spend some time discussing how Cream plans to promote gnosticism's traits as normative values to be embraced when you least expect it. I'd like to see him try to get away with such a plan; that should be good for a laugh. You see, most people have already observed that Cream's adherents have tried repeatedly to assure me that Cream will eventually tire of his plan to exhibit a deep disdain for all people who are not crude person non grat and will then step aside and let us substitute movement for stagnation, purposive behavior for drifting, and visions of a great future for collective pettiness and discouragement. When that will happen is unclear—probably sometime between "don't hold your breath" and "beware of flying pigs".

Sincerely,
Mr.Krabs

Offline Captain Communism

  • What?
  • *****
  • Posts: 899
  • Gender: Male
  • No really, what?
  • Respect: +230
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #4 on: July 24, 2011, 03:10:01 AM »
0
I have no comment, so I'll just put random letters.
adjfgosajf;lka j;lkfjalkfjlksa

inb4lox

Offline » Magic «

  • i play pc computer
  • ***
  • Windows UserLinux UserLeague PlayerOld Forum MemberCat LoverDedicated Summoner
    View More Badges!

  • Posts: 5075
  • Gender: Male
  • ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A
  • Respect: +782
    • MagiCorp
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2011, 03:34:02 AM »
0
I have never seen somebody write that much about a person...

Offline Cable

  • ******
  • Posts: 2182
  • Gender: Male
  • hi
  • Respect: +1085
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2011, 03:34:56 AM »
0
Mind = Blown.

I can't believe you typed all that..
Major tl;dr for me,

But I'm guessing this thread is...
being hateful?

I have no idea.

Offline Don

  • ******
  • Posts: 2556
  • Respect: +1201
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2011, 03:37:25 AM »
+1
Wait.
People actually believe he wrote that?
EL OH EL

Offline Cable

  • ******
  • Posts: 2182
  • Gender: Male
  • hi
  • Respect: +1085
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2011, 03:38:40 AM »
0
Wait.
People actually believe he wrote that?
EL OH EL
THERE IS A WEBSITE FOR GENERATING LONG ESSAYS LIKE THIS ISN'T THERE?

Offline Don

  • ******
  • Posts: 2556
  • Respect: +1201
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2011, 03:40:29 AM »
0
THERE IS A WEBSITE FOR GENERATING LONG ESSAYS LIKE THIS ISN'T THERE?
There probably is, you know.

But just google sentences out of the OP, you'll find it loads of times.

Offline Cable

  • ******
  • Posts: 2182
  • Gender: Male
  • hi
  • Respect: +1085
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2011, 03:40:34 AM »
+3
Well everyone, Please enjoy my essay on Myppl8.

Despite what many might think, myppl8 is well known across hundreds of nations all over the world. myppl8 has been around for several centuries and has a very important meaning in the lives of many. It would be safe to assume that myppl8 is going to be around for a long time and have an enormous impact on the lives of many people.

Social & Cultural Factors

myppl8 has a large role in American Culture. Many people can often be seen taking part in activities associated with myppl8. This is partly because people of most ages can be involved and families are brought together by this. Generally a person who displays their dislike for myppl8 may be considered an outcast.

Economic Factors

It is not common practice to associate economics with myppl8. Generally, myppl8 would be thought to have no effect on our economic situation, but there are in fact some effects. The sales industry associated with myppl8 is actually a 2.3 billion dollar a year industry and growing each year. The industry employs nearly 150,000 people in the United States alone. It would be safe to say that myppl8 play an important role in American economics and shouldn't be taken for granted.

Environmental Factors

After a three month long research project, I've been able to conclude that myppl8 doesn't negatively effect the environment at all. A myppl8 did not seem to result in waste products and couldn't be found in forests, jungles, rivers, lakes, oceans, etc... In fact, myppl8 produced some positive effects on our sweet little nature.

Political Factors

Oh does myppl8 ever influence politics. Last year 5 candidates running for some sort of position used myppl8 as the primary topic of their campaign. A person might think myppl8 would be a bad topic to lead a campaign with, but in fact with the social and environmental impact is has, this topic was able to gain a great number of followers. These 5 candidates went 4 for 5 on winning their positions.

Conclusion

myppl8 seem to be a much more important idea that most give credit for. Next time you see or think of myppl8, think about what you just read and realize what is really going on. It is likely you under valued myppl8 before, but will now start to give the credited needed and deserved.

I hope you all liked it.

Offline Supertoaster

  • A completely superfluous bottle of cough syrup
  • ***
  • Cat LoverWindows User
    View More Badges!

  • Posts: 3711
  • Gender: Male
  • Only six bucks
  • Respect: +1236
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2011, 04:01:50 AM »
0
An essay on Rebecca Black
While many learned professors have abandoned hope of ever discovering the truth behind Rebecca Black, I for one feel that it is still a worthy cause for examination. There are many factors which influenced the development of Rebecca Black. Indispensable to homosapians today, spasmodically it returns to create a new passion amongst those who study its history. Often it is seen as both a help and a hinderence to global commercial enterprises, whom I can say no more about due to legal restrictions. Keeping all of this in mind, in this essay I will examine the major issues.

Social Factors

There is cultural and institutional interdependence between members of any community. The immortal and indispensable phrase ‘honesty is the best policy’ [1] must have been referning to Rebecca Black. No symbol is more potent than Rebecca Black in society today. It is quite good.

Our post-literate society, more than ever before, relies upon Rebecca Black. It grows stonger every day.

Economic Factors

Derived from 'oikonomikos,' which means skilled in household management, the word economics is synonymous with Rebecca Black. We will primarily be focusing on the Lead-a-Duck-to-Water model, a classic economic system of analysis.
Housing
Prices   


Rebecca Black

There are a number of reasons which may be attributed to this unquestionable correlation. Obviously housing prices looms over Rebecca Black this cannot be a coincidence. A sharp down turn in middle class investment may lead to changes in the market.

Political Factors

Politics has in some areas been seen to embrace an increasing ananiathesis of intergovernmentalism leading to neo-functionalism. Comparing the ideals of the young with the reality felt by their elders is like contrasting the two, equally popular approaches to Rebecca Black. If the reader is unaware of these, they need only to turn on the television, or pick up a newspaper or popular magazine.

Let us consider the words of that silver tongued orator, jazz singer Achilles Bootlegger 'political change changes politics, but where does it go?' [2] He was first introduced to Rebecca Black by his mother. It would be wise to approach the subject with the thought that 'if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all'. However this can lead to missing out important facts.

One of the great ironies of this age is Rebecca Black. Isn't it ironic, don't you think?
Conclusion

To reiterate, Rebecca Black is both a need and a want. It inspires, 'literally' plants seeds for harvest, and it is human.

I shall give the final word to star Wyclef De Niro: 'You win some, you loose some, but Rebecca Black wins most

Offline Prox

  • WORLD MEME DATABASE
  • ******
  • Windows UserOld Forum MemberDog LoverBest Signature 2013
    View More Badges!

  • Posts: 2263
  • Gender: Male
  • The mosquito man
  • Respect: +1648
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2011, 04:22:02 AM »
0
Nice. Like you haven't had enough of that argument on your unban appeal.
Also
Wait.
People actually believe he wrote that?
EL OH EL


Offline » Magic «

  • i play pc computer
  • ***
  • Windows UserLinux UserLeague PlayerOld Forum MemberCat LoverDedicated Summoner
    View More Badges!

  • Posts: 5075
  • Gender: Male
  • ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A
  • Respect: +782
    • MagiCorp
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #13 on: July 24, 2011, 04:32:16 AM »
+1
In response to Mr. Krabs's scare tactics, I would like to offer the following opposing points. I would like to start by discussing Krabs's slurs, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that when one examines the ramifications of letting Krabs stand in the way of progress, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that his favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". Krabs likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. He then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for him to create a desolation and call it peace. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that even when the facts don't fit, Krabs sometimes tries to use them anyway. He still maintains, for instance, that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. When Krabs says that anyone who resists him deserves to be crushed, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound.

If the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to draw a picture of what we conceive of under the word "indistinguishableness". I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Krabs squeeze every last drop of blood from our overworked, overtaxed bodies. It makes me want to set the record straight, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that Krabs has for a long time been arguing that quislingism is the key to world peace. Had he instead been arguing that we must keep our eyes on the prize, I might cede him his point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Krabs's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how any rational argument must acknowledge this. His stolid, self-serving newsgroup postings, naturally, do not.

Let me recite the following phrases as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward towards increased ability to goad jaundiced hoodlums into hurling epithets at Krabs's critics: unsavory incubi; base-minded creeps; academicism; Krabs's protégés; Krabs. My point is that Krabs is causing all sorts of problems for us. We must grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way. He has no conscience and therefore no feelings of guilt for hoodooing us. Hard to believe? Then consider the following statement from one of his dastardly, daffy secret agents: "Black is white and night is day." Pretty frowsy, huh? Well, Krabs has no moral courage nor even a desire to be honest and forthright. So let Krabs call me hostile. I call him ill-bred.

Must it be explained to Krabs that he is a small part of a large movement that seeks to impair the practice of democracy? Because he obviously doesn't realize that if he truly believes that he values our perspectives, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101. Lackadaisical finks may endanger our property or our security or our economic well-being, but Krabs endangers our souls. What can I do to prove to you that he is blinded by greed? Show you evidence that Krabs's peons argue, against a steady accretion of facts of already mountainous proportions, that we'd all be better off if they'd just topple society? While that would undoubtedly help, if I had to choose the most slovenly specimen from his welter of atrabilious gabble, it would have to be his claim that he has the authority to issue licenses for practicing gangsterism.

Krabs hates people who have huge supplies of the things he lacks. What he lacks the most is common sense, which underlies my point that I frequently wish to tell Krabs that his remarks are based on prejudices and preconceived notions. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue. He's not your average churlish New Age loan shark. He's the deluxe model. As such, he's poised to give rise to disgusting thought police by the end of the decade.

It is no news that Krabs is a splenetic spoiled brat. I'm being super-extra nice when I say that. If I weren't so polite I instead would have stated that now that I've been exposed to Krabs's indiscretions I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps Krabs's reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, he always begins an argument with his conclusion (e.g., that everything will be hunky-dory if we let him revile everything in the most obscene terms and drag it into the filth of the basest possible outlook) and therefore—not surprisingly—he always arrives at that very conclusion.

Let me try to put this in perspective: Krabs has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and make people weak and dependent—all by trumping up a phony emergency. His squadristi portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression but are loath to reveal that I fully intend to make this world a kinder, gentler place. I will spare no labor in doing this and reckon no labor lost that brings me toward this mark. Even so, I am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly shed the light of truth on the evil that is Krabs. Nevertheless, I really do have the will to operate on today's real—not tomorrow's ideal—political terrain. That's why I honestly insist that Krabs is not as crapulous or mentally deficient as you might think. He's more so.

That's a very important point; it's easy for us to shake our heads at Krabs's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should deal stiffly with unbalanced bums who use paid informants and provocateurs to produce a new generation of slimy flag burners whose opinions and prejudices, far from being enlightened and challenged, are simply legitimized. It's easy for us to say, "Krabs's roorbacks carry multiple connotations, ranging from the morally crippled (they promote the lie of ruffianism) to the chauvinistic (they reduce us to acute penury)." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because there's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I assert, there's a time to move as expeditiously as possible to bring Krabs down a peg. Or, to put it less poetically, Krabs is unquestionably up to something. I don't know exactly what, but he thinks that his activities are Holy Writ. However, his language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.

I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to arraign Krabs at the tribunal of public opinion because doing so clearly demonstrates how thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Krabs's projects are a modern-day example of a Procrustean bed. I was right when I said that Krabs's agitprop machine is running at full throttle. And I was right when I said that a central point of Krabs's belief systems is the notion that we should derive moral guidance from Krabs's glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented suggestions. Perhaps he should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that he has planted his satraps everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance Krabs's ability to rob Peter to pay Paul, but it also provides irrefutable evidence that he's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of commercialism and you'll see a clueless mendicant hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of faddism in a nettlesome attempt to use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to deny both our individual and collective responsibility to live in harmony with each other and the world. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that life is a search for the true, the good, and the beautiful. It is not, as Krabs believes, an excuse to operate in the gray area between legitimate activity and grotesque Bulverism.

Krabs has repeatedly threatened to renege on an incredibly large number of promises. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because Krabs has a deficiency of real goals. There are several logical contradictions in his position on this matter. For example, Krabs says that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to his reprehensible prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. As usual, he can be counted on to wrap every actual fact in six layers of embellishment. The truth is that if Krabs got his way, he'd be able to palliate and excuse the atrocities of his cheerleaders. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. I'd like to end this letter with a message for Mr. Krabs. I'd like to say with emphasis and distinctness—not as a threat, but as a warning—that I will do whatever it takes to disentangle people from the snares set by Krabs and his cringers, and I won't let Krabs stop me from achieving that goal.

Offline [Valor]iPounce

  • My Waifu
  • *****
  • Old Forum MemberWindows UserLeague PlayerDog Lover
    View More Badges!

  • Posts: 1220
  • Gender: Female
  • Fun things are Fun
  • Respect: +312
Re: My Post on Cream Fortress 2
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2011, 04:58:25 AM »
+1
Tl;dgaf

"ς๏๏lzєl๔ค๔": WE RACIST
"KHMarie12": Fapping
"KHMarie12": lolwat; coolzeldad: iPounce stop making me think that I'm being ddos'd
[10:28] LazerBlade1: give me the thing