Author Topic: The definition of a first blood rdm  (Read 237 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Prox

  • WORLD MEME DATABASE
  • ******
  • Windows UserOld Forum MemberDog LoverBest Signature 2013
    View More Badges!

  • Posts: 2263
  • Gender: Male
  • The mosquito man
Re: The definition of a first blood rdm
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2013, 04:52:00 AM »
First blood RDM implies a particular situation, being, when an innocent gets first blood against a traitor who did nothing.

As everyone knows, traitors are supposed to get first blood, or attempted anyways.

Innocent RDMing innocent is just regular RDM.
It used to be like that but due to majority of people who have voiced their opinions it changed to this:
Quote
3. Players must do something(ie pull out a knife, plant c4, shoot or kill someone) before they can be suspected and killed. Killing a player at the start of the round before he has done anything is NOT ALLOWED!


Offline Sabb

  • ***
  • 2009 Snowball Competition WinnerWindows UserOld Forum MemberDedicated Summoner
    View More Badges!

  • Posts: 7378
  • Gender: Female
Re: The definition of a first blood rdm
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2013, 05:44:03 AM »
First blood RDM implies a particular situation, being, when an innocent gets first blood against a traitor who did nothing.

As everyone knows, traitors are supposed to get first blood, or attempted anyways.

Innocent RDMing innocent is just regular RDM.
The point is though that there wasn't any reason for the kill if it was so soon. Despite whether or not it's on an innocent, it still makes the actual offence worse. At least imo.


Lithuanian pride world wide!: sun doesnt revolve around the sun