Entertainment (Read Only) > Post-Based Games/Threads
Hypothetical rNd nation.
Ἆxule:
--- Quote from: Tiger Guy on July 19, 2012, 05:58:11 PM ---Even with 4 girls, we would be fucked within 3-4 generations.
It would kinda work like this:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
The family tree would be a circle.
--- End quote ---
Not exactly. There is are more than 8 people. Your chart just shows the family tree of 8 people and one kid for each. Assuming each woman has more than one, and with how much men we have on the forums, we won't be having much of a problem with incest like Marie said
Tiger Guy:
--- Quote from: Ἆxule on July 19, 2012, 06:03:14 PM ---Not exactly. There is are more than 8 people. Your chart just shows the family tree of 8 people and one kid for each. Assuming each woman has more than one, and with how much men we have on the forums, we won't be having much of a problem with incest like Marie said
--- End quote ---
I doubt Marie and other women will allowing being degraded to a baby popping whores.
○ Μαρία ○:
--- Quote from: Tiger Guy on July 19, 2012, 06:13:13 PM ---I doubt Marie and other women will allowing being degraded to a baby popping whores.
--- End quote ---
I am sure when you have a low population you don't really look at it as being whores, you look at it as being a contribution. You're not doing it for the money or the pleasure, but to help the community. I wouldn't have said what I did if I thought it was downgrading myself. I would be using a skill of mine that the other 100 members do not have, and that is producing. At least that's how I look at it, I am not sure about the other girls.
Ἆxule:
--- Quote from: Tiger Guy on July 19, 2012, 06:13:13 PM ---I doubt Marie and other women will allowing being degraded to a baby popping whores.
--- End quote ---
Why would it be degrading? It'd be necessary for the population to grow. Besides, we're not going to make each woman have something like 10+ kids each. I'd say between 2 and 5.
Also, "whore" isn't the right term.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)Whore: a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse, usually for money; prostitute; harlot; strumpet.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/whore?s=ts
Like Marie said, they wouldn't be doing it for the pleasure or money (or other supplements in this case since there won't be a currency).
Tiger Guy:
--- Quote from: Ἆxule on July 19, 2012, 06:20:06 PM ---Why would it be degrading? It'd be necessary for the population to grow. Besides, we're not going to make each woman have something like 10+ kids each. I'd say between 2 and 5.
Also, "whore" isn't the right term.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)Whore: a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse, usually for money; prostitute; harlot; strumpet.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/whore?s=ts
Like Marie said, they wouldn't be doing it for the pleasure or money (or other supplements in this case since there won't be a currency).
--- End quote ---
Even if they popped out 10 or 20 babies, shits going to be fucked up eventually.
--- Quote ---In conservation biology, there is a concept called "effective population size". This is the minimum number of individuals that will represent the genetic variability within a population. Fifty is a minimum commonly used by animal breeders. This gives about a 2-3% loss of heterozygosity per generation. Some have suggested that 500 indivduals is enough so that the the new mutation rate balances the loss of heterozygosity due to small population sizes (inbreeding depression).
--- End quote ---
Also, it's degrading because there's no love involved in this, they have to do it with different guys. Companionship would die. There would be no couples, just groups.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version