Support (Read Only) > Suggestions

Have a suggestion for the rules? Maybe a modificaiton?

<< < (11/14) > >>

Prox:

--- Quote from: Juan_Ambriz on August 23, 2012, 02:50:53 PM ---Ok prox I have never made tree house probably once or twice, I don't do it everytime I get the chance. Also I never said people that make it are "pro" I just find it a way to survive, the point of the game is survive. And also I've been he zombie MANY. Times going for sky cades that alkaline and kurtis have made, but I never raged got frustrated or gave up, I just continued to play.

--- End quote ---
Perhaps you didn't but I'm sure as hell other zombies did and lets face it, you would have much rather preferred them to be in a place where you could have killed them then in the sky cade.

Travelsonic:
A suggestion for TTT:

- Killing somebody must be justifiable with something substantial - DNA, T weapons, killing and/or hurting others without reason, a "I'm with" being followed with that person being found dead by that very person they said they were with, etc.

Why?

People who come up with some of the stupidest horseshit to justify killing somebody else, and then turns around and gets belligerent when somebody dares to turn around and say, "That is bullshit, here's why".

For example, and I still have the demo amongst the thousands on my external hard drive, on Crazy Cubes, it was mentioned that Traitors liked to hesitate, and do nothing.  Everybody was breaking the cubes, which as anyone knows, makes it hard to trait.  I was merely pointing out that the reason they stagnate is because without the glass, the map becomes too open to reasonably act, and what happens?  *BAM* shot by Pilot.  I happened to be a Traitor.  Next round we get into an argument, I point out that he had no reason, and he stuck to the guns that making observations I made, which could be based on previous rounds, but are still ones anyone could make, T or not, was enough.

Seriously, common sense must exist somewhere.  Common sense must draw a line between something being solid, something being justifiable, something being hard to prove but sorta ok, and something being so horseshit that it can't be anything but RDM.  Sure it doesn't really happen often relatively speaking, but it happens, and others are getting the idea that this practice is OK, which - especially with all the Youtube driven newfags - is not OK at all.

Prox:
Killing someone because of stupid reasons is equal to an RDM.

Sabb:

--- Quote from: Prox on August 29, 2012, 12:41:05 PM ---Killing someone because of stupid reasons is equal to an RDM.

--- End quote ---
This. If anything just mention it where ever it mentions RDM in the rules. Like just add on (killing without any substantial reasoning is considered RDM).

Travelsonic:

--- Quote from: Sabb on August 29, 2012, 12:56:26 PM ---This. If anything just mention it where ever it mentions RDM in the rules. Like just add on (killing without any substantial reasoning is considered RDM).

--- End quote ---

That would be much simpler than adding a whole new rule - I guess my suggestion was much more suited as an addendum note.

I think such a note is especially imperative with the swarm of Youtube newfags who come on this and other TTT servers, after watching videos of idiots who RDM, etc, and do the same.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version