.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) > Discussion
I just realized..
Don:
--- Quote from: Shockah on April 22, 2012, 03:58:59 AM ---It's sad because when compared to prior installments (Battlefield 3 being Battlefield 1 and 2 none of that Bad Company excuse for games) both of them are pretty shit games.
--- End quote ---
It's because the target market changed.
Simple, straight-forward run'n'gun games with a ton of brown and bloom sell infinitely better than any other kind of shooting game. Games have to be dumbed down to appeal to the "call of duty crowd".
Then again, what you like or don't like is always subjective, so saying that "BF3 is better than MW3!" or "TF2 is the best shooter ever" is silly.
Deacon:
Rocket50:
--- Quote from: Excalipoor on April 21, 2012, 11:38:31 PM ---Nope. You are wrong.
I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3
COD: MW3 : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.
--- End quote ---
>Graphics are different between multiplayer and singleplayer
>MW3 has storyline
mfw
Seb:
--- Quote from: Excalipoor on April 21, 2012, 11:38:31 PM ---Nope. You are wrong.
I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3
COD: MW3 : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.
--- End quote ---
the_average_cod_player.png
Rocket50:
--- Quote from: Seb on April 22, 2012, 09:52:40 AM ---the_average_cod_player.png
--- End quote ---
To be fair, the only good thing about CoD is its fast-paced run and gun gameplay, as opposed to battlefield, flashpoint, and arma which are slower.
Some people enjoy that shit I guess :/
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version