.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) > Discussion

I just realized..

<< < (6/12) > >>

Doctor Who:

--- Quote from: Supertoaster on April 21, 2012, 11:46:10 PM --- my face when realistic graphics

--- End quote ---
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Frank:

--- Quote from: Excalipoor on April 21, 2012, 11:38:31 PM ---Nope. You are wrong.

I prefer COD: MW3 than Battlefield 3

COD: MW3   : For Realistic Graphic only in Singleplayer, Singleplayer storyline, Multiplayer weapons and killstreak
Battlefield 3 : For Realistic Graphic in Multiplayer and vehicles.


--- End quote ---
Haha, no.
MW3's story is shit. MW3's singleplayer campaign is shit.

MW3 IS shit. Not even multiplayer is good. I bothered as much as to go to 3/4 of the story. Then I just read how it ended, because it sucked.

However, if BF3 wasn't so fucking buggy and had such shitty online systems, it'd win.

But it's fucking buggy and has such shitty online systems. And singleplayer is horrorific. They both lose.

0/10 would not bang

semy32:
Modern warfare 3 sucked honestly, nothing new, shit story, shit campaign

Cod 2 is still the best cod. And the graphics of cod 2 is good, I mean... just look at the guns.

Battlefield 3 sucked too. Shit story, Very shitty campaign, it's buggy as hell.

Even bad company 2 was shit.

Supertoaster:
It's sad because Team Fortress 2 is better then both of them.

Shockah:
It's sad because when compared to prior installments (Battlefield 3 being Battlefield 1 and 2 none of that Bad Company excuse for games) both of them are pretty shit games.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page