I shall resume the conversation among me and others from the blackdavil8's appeal and other fellow players.
So the conversation resulted in a trust among admins?
And should admins swear and swear as they like?
Yup that is RND for you even if an admin call you a retard and that you can't read when confronted about a ban that had no evidence provided for it. It results in a trust among admins so basically the player has no right to ask for a fair trial as the fact. Admins are meant to provide proof for the ban which is called ethical behaviour, but in this case it was a mere fact of I suspect you all of ghosting I ban you all. Some people were not even online when that happened which is why it is questionable.
Regarding of swearing it took place after I asked her normally as to why I got banned. Which then resulted me in swearing back but over all I believe rnd needs to change the way they are picking their admins. Cause it just shows already how much respect rnds admins have for players that always contribute to their server.
The legal action of an admin is to gather evidence screenshots/ damage logs/ demos file a report and then ban. That is called ethical behaviour of an admin that does their job right. The actions taken by Teeny and some stuff that is rather not mentioned here is not ethical and should be dealt with accordingly, due to the event that looked like a tantrum of a 8-10 ban spree of old players who have supported this community and have contributed to it.
Admins are meant to behave like real admins that are above VIP which file reports and ban people on solid evidence not on just "Suspected" without any solid proof and not call people retards when they ask for a demo instead of the excuse "I suspected you"