imgIt was an idea I got that got sparked up of your arguement with Frank in the other thread :P
death.
I don't see why i am paying for the rapists and child molesters, the pimps, druggies, the murderers
to have food, water, and the armed shelter none of us could buy.
And besides you'd be no different then the murder if you killed him.
But...did the prosecutor cause people harm and deaths of many innocent lives?
But...did the prosecutor cause people harm and deaths of many innocent lives?
^ This, also, when they kill them, isn't it painless? (sorry groggy right now and I'm even forgetting what my left from my right is...)
And besides you'd be no different then the murder if you killed him.if you don't kill the murderer all those innocent people he killed
no its actually quick painful.
guy called me a faggot:jail for 2 yearsFrank would like that law.
Well, it most likely beats being stabbed, shot, choked, raped, etc, etc. O_o
if you don't kill the murderer all those innocent people he killedSo their murder getting killed makes their death have a point?
would have died in vain so death
So their murder getting killed makes their death have a point?i dunno. i just like revenge :idk: (no offence)
Dude.
Get out.
i dunno. i just like revenge :idk: (no offence)
i'm willing to bet If you were the one that had to pull the trigger you would chicken out (no offence)wtf...no
I'd be like Ezio Auditore! He killed alot of ppl and he didn't went in jail he continued to kill ppl!!!so fucking true...
I totally tl;dr'd the whole thread after reading the OP.*kills family*
Just kill them,
Why waste your tax money? So it can go to a dumpy jail and give food to criminals?
No.
Just no.
*kills family*Criminal: :abuse:
me: D:<
Criminal:>:D
*pulls outshotgun*
Criminal: D:<
*headshot*
me:>:D
So I what I got this thread:I think the both category means like,
Majority of the community would rather kill a person than have him live in a shitty jail for the rest of his life, because they don't want to pay taxes for them.
Well, First of all, most of the community here doesn't pay taxes...
Second of all, if there were no death sentence any where, you would still be paying for similar amount of taxes because no doubt the government will make up some new bullshit taxes for something else to keep you paying a similar amount.
Also, from what I know, lethal injection isn't all too cheap either, but I'm probably wrong on that.
Anyhow, wtf is the last option?
Both?
How can you kill a person and have him in jail?
I don't think it counts if you keep their corpse in jail.
I think the both category means like,Ahh that makes more sense.
Put the person in jail for 30 years and kill them?
Ahh that makes more sense.
Personally, I think it would make more sense if they just ended their misery and not wait 30 years for what's coming..That wouldn't be much punishment though.
If I ran a country, it would be an arm for an arm.
Example:
Someone gouges another person's eye.
We gouge his eye.
Personally, I think it would make more sense if they just ended their misery and not wait 30 years for what's coming..Well if it's punishment you're really looking for (I don't mean you specifically), than it would be more punishing to have the person live a limited life in jail. The people wanting a person through a death sentence are only looking for immediate satisfaction, as disturbing as it sounds. But when you think of it a minute, if a person is sent to jail, they're going to review their whole lives every minute they're in there, thinking what they could have done differently and if what they had done was necessary or proper, and wishing they had their freedom back. So jail is more of a punishment in other words. If more people looked away from in the moment, and didn't have their minds so focused on revenge, a lot more people were realize this.
If I ran a country, it would be an arm for an arm.This post explains its own derp...
Example:
Someone gouges another person's eye.
We gouge his eye.
So what if they torture 10+ people...? Howdya do that?
Or what if it's a case of rape...involving scat.Well, Cake Face would help out in that case I'm sure.
Or what if it's a case of rape...involving scat....just no
Well if it's punishment you're really looking for (I don't mean you specifically), than it would be more punishing to have the person live a limited life in jail. The people wanting a person through a death sentence are only looking for immediate satisfaction, as disturbing as it sounds. But when you think of it a minute, if a person is sent to jail, they're going to review their whole lives every minute they're in there, thinking what they could have done differently and if what they had done was necessary or proper, and wishing they had their freedom back. So jail is more of a punishment in other words. If more people looked away from in the moment, and didn't have their minds so focused on revenge, a lot more people were realize this.
Well, Cake Face would help out in that case I'm sure.
But thinking about all those thoughts, the thoughts of when you were free, about how you would never have that back, that the rest of your life is going to be sitting in a jail cell thinking about these depressing thoughts and then knowing when you would meet your maker, that is torture, and if I were them, I would have just suicided and stop my own suffering. Although it WOULD be the cowardly way to deal with itNot torture.
But thinking about all those thoughts, the thoughts of when you were free, about how you would never have that back, that the rest of your life is going to be sitting in a jail cell thinking about these depressing thoughts and then knowing when you would meet your maker, that is torture, and if I were them, I would have just suicided and stop my own suffering. Although it WOULD be the cowardly way to deal with itthat's just sad
Frank would like that law.Also, no.
>an eye for an eye
>and the whole world goes blind.
Say you give someone 30 years and death sentence. His sentence is done. 35 years after his imprisonment, new investigations prove he was innocent.
Now, what the fuck do you do?
So what if they torture 10+ people...? Howdya do that?Clone him 10 times ..
This is Silly.I didn't fully understand.
I am Silly.
Silly.
But it's what my narcissistic-depressive-rationale side is saying.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Clone him 10 times ..
A man kills a whole family while they're sleeping. Deaththats what im saying...
thats what im saying...In our country we can't kill human if he murdered some1 only one way- jail(for whole life).
In our country we can't kill human if he murdered some1 only one way- jail(for whole life).
My sister if fighting against that, and I'm with her.
I saw someone said it should be dead because of the revenge.Wouldn't want to hurt the childrems.
For me, life can be a gift but also can be a punishiment.
>From the point of view of someone that wants revenge, i would say the guy should go to jail his whole life.
>But from a point of view more ...(idk what to say here)... the main idea is to keep the society safe, so a man that raped and killed 15 childrems is a big danger to the comunity and should be killed.
>But from a point of view of religion... it is obvious that killing someone is bad.
Soo for me, letting someone live his wole life in jail is the best option.
Wouldn't want to hurt the childrems.
I saw someone said it should be dead because of the revenge.No, because religion(if with that you mean Christianism(legacy of Jewish religion)) says the whole town should throw rocks at a woman at her father's house if she lost her virginity before marriage.
For me, life can be a gift but also can be a punishiment.
>From the point of view of someone that wants revenge, i would say the guy should go to jail his whole life.
>But from a point of view more ...(idk what to say here)... the main idea is to keep the society safe, so a man that raped and killed 15 childrems is a big danger to the comunity and should be killed.
>But from a point of view of religion... it is obvious that killing someone is bad.
Soo for me, letting someone live his wole life in jail is the best option.
No, because religion(if with that you mean Christianism(legacy of Jewish religion)) says the whole town should throw rocks at a woman at her father's house if she lost her virginity before marriage.
If you are saying that killing is like trowing rocks, i belive jesus said "He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.">implying people listen to that
>implying people listen to thatDon't worry, I ok with you.
You don't see most Christians okay with fags, do you?
Don't worry, I ok with you.Nice thinking.
Besides, its not my place to judge, nor any human's.
>implying people listen to thatLets stereotype guys!
You don't see most Christians okay with fags, do you?
Lets stereotype guys!
The Christians you are talking about are only the kind that preach shit about their religion (mostly orthodox Christians).
I can promise you that there are many more Christians than you know who don't follow stupid shit like that about disapproving gays and any other bullshit.
Frank, you're gay and proud. We get it. You're cool and all but this is moderately annoying.
When I used to be Christian I was okay with gays and everything, I didn't get what all the hate was abo- do we REALLY have to have Frank start some kind of gay pride argument whenever he can?>implying I was talking about gays
Frank, you're gay and proud. We get it. You're cool and all but this is moderately annoying.
Lets stereotype guys!Show me them good guys!
The Christians you are talking about are only the kind that preach shit about their religion (mostly orthodox Christians).
I can promise you that there are many more Christians than you know who don't follow stupid shit like that about disapproving gays and any other bullshit.
Show me them good guys!
Don't worry, I ok with you.Derp. Just Derp.
Besides, its not my place to judge, nor any human's.
Derp. Just Derp.>implying I said everyone
>because he was totally held a gun-point and forced to tell us all that he's homosexual.Correct