.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers

.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) => Discussion => Topic started by: Frank on February 06, 2011, 03:53:45 PM

Title: Happy people
Post by: Frank on February 06, 2011, 03:53:45 PM
I just realised happy people don't smoke cigarettes.


No, seriously. All the happy people I've met don't smoke fags at all.
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Deacon on February 06, 2011, 03:58:54 PM
its a crutch.
not really, but i see what you mean.
although i would like to point out hookah is an exception.
don't smoke it kids, its worse than cigarettes. (cause you smoke a whole bowl instead of a cigarette)
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Shawn on February 06, 2011, 04:02:38 PM
its a crutch.
not really, but i see what you mean.
although i would like to point out hookah is an exception.
don't smoke it kids, its worse than cigarettes. (cause you smoke a whole bowl instead of a cigarette)

LOL no its not, its perfectly safe.
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Frank on February 06, 2011, 04:04:21 PM
People have never died for smoking to much weed.

Weed has never been a cause of death, unlike nicotine.
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Deacon on February 06, 2011, 04:09:53 PM
WHAT
are you joking

you could smoke lettuce and it would give you cancer
its the smoke that gives you cancer

the difference is the tobacco in cigarettes. fucking companies add shit and you know it
vs. say, hookah
which is just coated in flavored molasses
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Foofoojack on February 06, 2011, 04:10:35 PM
Happy people smoke. That's what makes them happy.
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Don on February 06, 2011, 04:12:15 PM
Weed is far less dangerous than smoking. Not saying it's a good thing, but you can't get physically addicted to weed itself, only to the nicotine you usually put in the joints. Meaning, it's far easier to get away from weed than is it from cigarrettes.
And in order to overdose on weed, you'd need to consume around 20 kilogram - an amount that would be probably be impossible since you'd throw up all over the place before even coming close to it. Even then you're very unlikely to die.
If you truly think weed gives you cancer, you're an enormous idiot, because the mixture in cigarrettes is the main reason for helping the cancer develop, not the smoke on its own.
Seriously, arguing that weed is worse than nicotine is stupid; you get addicted to nicotine easier, are more likely ot get cancer, don't even get an instant benefit out of it, and so on.

The reason why most smokers are unhappy is because most people start smoking due to a huge amount of stress/depression.
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Bear on February 06, 2011, 04:13:01 PM
Happy folk is happy cause no  8) leads into no being  :ghost: instea they get  :cake: and get to watch new  :pokeball: and  :hellokitty: <3
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Shawn on February 06, 2011, 04:18:21 PM
WHAT
are you joking

you could smoke lettuce and it would give you cancer
its the smoke that gives you cancer

the difference is the tobacco in cigarettes. fucking companies add shit and you know it
vs. say, hookah
which is just coated in flavored molasses

Are you sure you know what a hookah is? Beause a hookah is a fancy bong (pretty much) therefore it can't hurt but depending what you fill the bowl with can.
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Foofoojack on February 06, 2011, 04:23:30 PM
Happy folk is happy cause no  8) leads into no being  :ghost: instea they get  :cake: and get to watch new  :pokeball: and  :hellokitty: <3
Smoking can make you look  :abuse: and get no  :icecream: and light you on  :fire: and you become a huge  :troll: and kill people with a  :knife: and plant  :bomb:'s in airports and then get  :money:. Wait what?
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Deacon on February 06, 2011, 04:25:45 PM
Weed is far less dangerous than smoking. Not saying it's a good thing, but you can't get physically addicted to weed itself, only to the nicotine you usually put in the joints. Meaning, it's far easier to get away from weed than is it from cigarrettes.
And in order to overdose on weed, you'd need to consume around 20 kilogram - an amount that would be probably be impossible since you'd throw up all over the place before even coming close to it. Even then you're very unlikely to die.
If you truly think weed gives you cancer, you're an enormous idiot, because the mixture in cigarrettes is the main reason for helping the cancer develop, not the smoke on its own.
Seriously, arguing that weed is worse than nicotine is stupid; you get addicted to nicotine easier, are more likely ot get cancer, don't even get an instant benefit out of it, and so on.

The reason why most smokers are unhappy is because most people start smoking due to a huge amount of stress/depression.

i wasn't arguing that weed was worse, only that the smoke, regardless of the source, is bad for you. it could be a fucking cactus.


Are you sure you know what a hookah is? Beause a hookah is a fancy bong (pretty much) therefore it can't hurt but depending what you fill the bowl with can.
um...yes, i do.
and that was my point
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Shawn on February 06, 2011, 04:32:32 PM
um...yes, i do.
and that was my point

Clearly not since you said "hookah
which is just coated in flavored molasses"

While hookah is a tool for smoking anything therefore its not a  substance "coated in flavored molasses"
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Deacon on February 06, 2011, 04:38:08 PM
must you get so technical? its just flavored fucking tobacco
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Rocket50 on February 06, 2011, 04:47:14 PM
If you truly think weed gives you cancer, you're an enormous idiot, because the mixture in cigarrettes is the main reason for helping the cancer develop, not the smoke on its own.
Seriously, arguing that weed is worse than nicotine is stupid; you get addicted to nicotine easier, are more likely ot get cancer, don't even get an instant benefit out of it, and so on.

The reason why most smokers are unhappy is because most people start smoking due to a huge amount of stress/depression.

http://www.well.com/user/woa/fspot.htm (http://www.well.com/user/woa/fspot.htm)

How does marijuana affect the lungs?
Scientists believe that marijuana can be especially harmful to the lungs because users often inhale the unfiltered smoke deeply and hold it in their lungs as long as possible. Therefore, the smoke is in contact with lung tissues for long periods of time, which irritates the lungs and damages the way they work. Marijuana smoke contains some of the same ingredients in tobacco smoke that can cause emphysema and cancer.

http://lungcancer.about.com/od/causesoflungcance1/f/marijuana.htm (http://lungcancer.about.com/od/causesoflungcance1/f/marijuana.htm)

Recent studies, in contrast, do appear to link smoking marijuana with lung cancer.

One study demonstrated a doubling in lung cancer for male marijuana smokers who also used tobacco. Another study found that long-term use of marijuana increased the risk of lung cancer in young adults (55 and under), with the risk increasing in proportion to the amount of marijuana smoked.

Many of the carcinogens (Cancer causing agents) and co-carcinogens present in tobacco smoke are also present in smoke from marijuana.
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Frank on February 06, 2011, 04:50:41 PM
http://www.well.com/user/woa/fspot.htm (http://www.well.com/user/woa/fspot.htm)

How does marijuana affect the lungs?
Scientists believe that marijuana can be especially harmful to the lungs because users often inhale the unfiltered smoke deeply and hold it in their lungs as long as possible. Therefore, the smoke is in contact with lung tissues for long periods of time, which irritates the lungs and damages the way they work. Marijuana smoke contains some of the same ingredients in tobacco smoke that can cause emphysema and cancer.

http://lungcancer.about.com/od/causesoflungcance1/f/marijuana.htm (http://lungcancer.about.com/od/causesoflungcance1/f/marijuana.htm)

Recent studies, in contrast, do appear to link smoking marijuana with lung cancer.

One study demonstrated a doubling in lung cancer for male marijuana smokers who also used tobacco. Another study found that long-term use of marijuana increased the risk of lung cancer in young adults (55 and under), with the risk increasing in proportion to the amount of marijuana smoked.
Name 1 person who died of lung cancer provoked by marijuana.
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Deathie on February 06, 2011, 04:51:58 PM
stuff

There are /other/ ways to get it in your system aside from smoking it, which can neutralize the harmful toxins entirely.
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Rocket50 on February 06, 2011, 04:53:26 PM
Name 1 person who died of lung cancer provoked by marijuana.

Theres many different articles that both say that smoking weed will and will not cause cancer. I dont know which one to believe :l
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Don on February 06, 2011, 04:54:13 PM
One study demonstrated a doubling in lung cancer for male marijuana smokers who also used tobacco.
Hey guys, let's make this study on a drug but let people use another drug at the same time ^_^
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Rocket50 on February 06, 2011, 04:56:39 PM
Hey guys, let's make this study on a drug but let people use another drug at the same time ^_^

Then read the next sentence.

Again, I really dont know which articles are real and which ones are bullshit :l
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Frank on February 06, 2011, 05:00:17 PM
Then read the next sentance.

Again, i really dont know which articles are real and which ones are bullshit :l
Oh man, the lack of spell check kills my eyes.

As of now, less toxic weed is winning the case.
Title: Re: Happy people
Post by: Deathie on February 06, 2011, 05:05:58 PM
Oh man, the lack of spell check kills my eyes.

As of now, less toxic weed is winning the case.

Who gives a shit?

Spoiler (click to show/hide)