Bans (Read Only) > Unapproved

Admin Abuse

<< < (3/4) > >>

Castle:
I might aswell say "Deacon is abusing his vip with votebanning mah ass"

But i don't HAVE any proof of that situation

I rather get proof before posting any of this so called "Admin Abuse"

memo3300:

--- Quote from: Sir Hoffman on November 12, 2011, 01:48:51 AM ---I might aswell say "Deacon is abusing his vip with votebanning mah ass"

But i don't HAVE any proof of that situation

I rather get proof before posting any of this so called "Admin Abuse"

--- End quote ---

Deacon isn't vip

sorry had to say it

Castle:

--- Quote from: memo3300 on November 12, 2011, 07:08:19 AM ---Deacon isn't vip

sorry had to say it

--- End quote ---

;l

Well what then? Reg,VIP? last time i saw him he was a VIP'eh.

Travelsonic:
IMO, we'd need proof - without it, we can't verify the veracity of these claims being made.

I personally recommend following the format just because it does a god job at ensuring you have everything you need - the who(s), what, where, when, and proof, and people not only understand why you make the report, but are in a far better position to support it. 

1337h4x0r:
All you guys are talking about proof. How the hell am i supposed to get proof on something that has already happened?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version