Bans (Read Only) > Unapproved
Admin Abuse
Castle:
I might aswell say "Deacon is abusing his vip with votebanning mah ass"
But i don't HAVE any proof of that situation
I rather get proof before posting any of this so called "Admin Abuse"
memo3300:
--- Quote from: Sir Hoffman on November 12, 2011, 01:48:51 AM ---I might aswell say "Deacon is abusing his vip with votebanning mah ass"
But i don't HAVE any proof of that situation
I rather get proof before posting any of this so called "Admin Abuse"
--- End quote ---
Deacon isn't vip
sorry had to say it
Castle:
--- Quote from: memo3300 on November 12, 2011, 07:08:19 AM ---Deacon isn't vip
sorry had to say it
--- End quote ---
;l
Well what then? Reg,VIP? last time i saw him he was a VIP'eh.
Travelsonic:
IMO, we'd need proof - without it, we can't verify the veracity of these claims being made.
I personally recommend following the format just because it does a god job at ensuring you have everything you need - the who(s), what, where, when, and proof, and people not only understand why you make the report, but are in a far better position to support it.
1337h4x0r:
All you guys are talking about proof. How the hell am i supposed to get proof on something that has already happened?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version