.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) > Discussion

You know I don't mind people who are lbgtq. But seriously what the fuck...

<< < (2/4) > >>

Captain Communism:

--- Quote from: Prox on July 23, 2013, 06:12:38 AM ---Most people find homosexuality bad already but when fanaticism kicks in then people start despising it.

--- End quote ---
That's true for a lot of things. The issue I see is that most of these people probably weren't even homosexuals, but rather transexuals or, to use the term, queers. Most of the gays I know don't give two shits about the whole gender identity thing.

Also, the "Let the baby decide its name" made me believe a lot of these people were trolling...

·UηİŦ··:
arghblagnsgniesifndkfsnfsdfs

I can't find a suitable way to reply, but if I could it'd be both snarky and grumpy at the same time. Most likely trolls for sure, but...

Spoiler (click to show/hide)There's an argument here, that much I know. For example, it would seem most people just want a transgendered prince/princess/goodgriefwhateverthehellyoucallthebaby... don't see how that changes anything if a normative male/female character gets access to the throne and does some nice things for the world.

Or, not. But, asdf. There seems to be a fad/fanatical cult following where people 'want' to support LGBTQ, but so much that it becomes absurd. I don't deny that the baby couldn't very well decide that some days it was a female, or it's own definition of gender, but it's a fucking baby right now. It hasn't, nor will it ever at this stage establish a gender identity...

It very well has had it's biological sex identified.

Male. Maybe it's an XX male, but no one knows that yet. For all we know it's a completely normative XY male babby, no syndrome or chromosomes out of place.

I mean, seriously. It's a baby, it has not said it's first words yet.

Why does it need a gender identity, now? It'll invent one later, when it matters.
fak

CodeKyuubi:
On that thread, people who think being gender-confused is normal. When outliers all come together to circlejerk...

Sabb:

--- Quote from: ·UηİŦ··© on July 23, 2013, 06:18:26 AM ---arghblagnsgniesifndkfsnfsdfs

I can't find a suitable way to reply, but if I could it'd be both snarky and grumpy at the same time. Most likely trolls for sure, but...

Spoiler (click to show/hide)There's an argument here, that much I know. For example, it would seem most people just want a transgendered prince/princess/goodgriefwhateverthehellyoucallthebaby... don't see how that changes anything if a normative male/female character gets access to the throne and does some nice things for the world.

Or, not. But, asdf. There seems to be a fad/fanatical cult following where people 'want' to support LGBTQ, but so much that it becomes absurd. I don't deny that the baby couldn't very well decide that some days it was a female, or it's own definition of gender, but it's a fucking baby right now. It hasn't, nor will it ever at this stage establish a gender identity...

It very well has had it's biological sex identified.

Male. Maybe it's an XX male, but no one knows that yet. For all we know it's a completely normative XY male babby, no syndrome or chromosomes out of place.

I mean, seriously. It's a baby, it has not said it's first words yet.

Why does it need a gender identity, now? It'll invent one later, when it matters.
fak

--- End quote ---
Tbh I don't doubt half those people aren't even a part of the lgbt community and are just band-wagoning for the 'cause' or w.e.


--- Quote from: Prox on July 23, 2013, 06:12:38 AM ---Most people find homosexuality bad already but when fanaticism kicks in then people start despising it.

--- End quote ---
That's truly the case for literally anything ever so minimally controversial. This is by no means a justified reason to dislike homosexuals or come to a conclusion of this behaviour being why they're disliked. As I see it sexual preference has nothing to do with this. These are simply ignorant people that will show those traits in most likely any other topic. Imo if anyone's going to be criticising someone I would rather criticise the behaviour itself or even the person, but not any social group they may or may not be associated with. Here it's ignorant, uninformed people you're criticising, not homosexuals.

qt:
CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE CIS-SCUM

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page