Bans (Read Only) > Unapproved

whagman ban reduction.

(1/2) > >>

whagman:



So I was banned for 6:28 PM - Deacon: For impersonation, admin impersonation, troubled history, and poor reasoning.


I understand that I was banned for what I now know as global rule #7, but I don't know why for 2 months. I thought that when it comes to name, you can't have an unpronounceable name, or take someones name who is also playing, but I didn't know it mattered while they weren't there. I know I deserve the ban, but I still can't put my finger on why my ban is 2 months. It was my first offense, and it was harmless fun, and everyone in the server knew it was me. srry

Sabb:
Considering what your response to him was, your past history and general attitude, and WHO you impersonated, I don't think it really deserves to be shortened. I'm sure it would have easily been 1 month or even less if you had responded decently.
I'm hoping someone still has the chat log btw. I'll let Deacon explain more though.

memo3300:
I don't want to be mean but...

There have been players permantly banned for impersonating...

Deacon:
Stupid me didn't save the chat logs.

I asked you several times if you were ok with this punishment. I explained my reasoning and asked again if you were ok. You told me yes, so I did.
You never admitted fault. You tried to push blame, tried to play it down.

I last asked if you had anything to say, you said no. I thought we were at an agreement.

whagman:
I never pushed the blame on anyone, and we established that. And i did admit fault.


5:55 PM - Deacon: Because you're playing it like its not a problem
5:55 PM - Deacon: Like its ok and you don't understand
5:55 PM - Deacon: Trying to push blame on others as well.
5:55 PM - whagman: i havent blamed anyone
5:56 PM - Deacon: You threw out 3 names
5:56 PM - whagman: watcher
5:56 PM - whagman: thats it
5:56 PM - whagman: i jsut said that other people
5:56 PM - whagman: said they knew
5:56 PM - whagman: not blaming
5:56 PM - whagman: just
5:56 PM - whagman: they knew it was me
5:56 PM - Deacon: 5:46 PM - whagman: it was with like code lazord cactus
5:56 PM - whagman: yeah
5:56 PM - Deacon: ig
5:56 PM - Deacon: oh*
5:56 PM - whagman: i didnt blame them
5:56 PM - whagman: yeah
5:56 PM - whagman: i was with them
5:56 PM - Deacon: Either way
5:56 PM - whagman: i didnt blame them
5:57 PM - whagman: i understand how impersonating an admin
5:57 PM - whagman: is bad
5:57 PM - whagman: but
5:57 PM - whagman: nvm
5:57 PM - Deacon: Well, yes
5:57 PM - Deacon: but the others is still a violation of the rule
5:57 PM - whagman: k
5:58 PM - Deacon: So you recognize that
5:58 PM - whagman: yeah
5:58 PM - whagman: i know i was rulebreaking
5:58 PM - whagman: i just dont get how its 2 mo
5:59 PM - whagman: yeah my previous actions

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page