Bans (Read Only) > Approved

[Demote] MetalDeerSolid -- Regular abuse

(1/5) > >>

ursus:
Player's SteamID
STEAM_0:0:5011390

Player's name
MetalDeerSolid

My in-game name
ursus

Server name
Trouble in Terrorist Town

Event(s)
Had to kick a lot of people for RDM today. This guy voted no on them twice after I had already established the reason for the kick, and refused to offer an explanation in the last 1-2 hours. I added him on steam to give him a final chance to explain himself, but he's ignored that too.

Reason for ban
Obviously doesn't deserve reg. If it was up to me, I'd recommend a ban along with a demotion but it's up to the admin on this one.

Screenshots

metalbeersolid:
Am I not entitled to my own opinions?
Am I the one who is affecting how others play the game?

I would like to think that the answer is no, but Ursus disagrees. Just because I don't keep track of the text chat he thinks that I am personally ignoring him.
When he added me as a friend, that was all he did, no questions or anything.

As for the request for a ban, how come voting against him is worse than actually RDMing? I think he has taken this a little too personally.

Sabb:

--- Quote from: metalbeersolid on August 31, 2012, 08:42:50 PM ---Am I not entitled to my own opinions?
Am I the one who is affecting how others play the game?

I would like to think that the answer is no, but Ursus disagrees. Just because I don't keep track of the text chat he thinks that I am personally ignoring him.
When he added me as a friend, that was all he did, no questions or anything.

As for the request for a ban, how come I do not see any ban request for the actually RDMers? I think he has taken this a little too personally.

--- End quote ---
Looking over the chat, his attempts and his general approach to his situation with you and the two RDMers (Which were definitely RDMing? Look at the log.), he did not take anything too personally and was rather quite level headed and calm. I'm not liking your attitude here though. If you deny a damn vote from a VIP, you damn better well pay attention to the chat because there will be questions asked. Regs are entirely entitled to their own opinion but they're expected to make decent judgement. By you making poor judgement in every possible way in this situation, yes, you did affect the gameplay of others as now the two people who should have been kicked can continue or evade which at least one did do. So you're not the one directly causing the problem but you're basically making an attempt at NOT solving the problem with the players, which in itself is a problem.
But even here you spent over 10 minutes making a post and didn't even defend your decision to vote no. Not a good sign. Your demotion will entirely depend on your next response.

ursus:

--- Quote from: metalbeersolid on August 31, 2012, 08:42:50 PM ---Am I not entitled to my own opinions?
Am I the one who is affecting how others play the game?

I would like to think that the answer is no, but Ursus disagrees. Just because I don't keep track of the text chat he thinks that I am personally ignoring him.
When he added me as a friend, that was all he did, no questions or anything.

As for the request for a ban, how come voting against him is worse than actually RDMing? I think he has taken this a little too personally.

--- End quote ---

You were literally given every possible chance to offer an explanation. It's apparent that you didn't have any decent reason for voting no on two perfectly valid kicks. You were given regular out of trust, and you're just using it to add stress to my day. I don't see how you're at all "entitled" to that.

Dark Pacifist:
In both his defense and against him he has been voting no to every cast vote... after enough say yes for the vote to pass.
By definition he is abusing reg status but physically what he's done doesn't change the outcome.

A demotion isn't exactly necessary but then again it's not my call.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page