Bans (Read Only) > Approved
Reporting Batman for misuse of Reg.
Boncey:
If he only First Blood RDMed once then +-0 but of he did it more than once +1
memo3300:
--- Quote from: Boncey on August 14, 2012, 03:30:31 AM ---If he only First Blood RDMed once then +-0 but of he did it more than once +1
--- End quote ---
Bounce, when someone talks on the reports, we are hoping for proofs, witnesses, arguments about something who isn't clear at all, and pretty much anything that can be tough as useful.
But the thing is that saying +1 or -1 in reports doesn't help at all, since admins wont judge how many people agree or disagree with what the player did, he will judge his actions by the rules.
(note: If you think what the player did is debatable, you can feel free to post your opinion, but most of times this will be when you think the player shouldn't be banned or someones say he doesn't deserves the ban and you want to reply to that)
[TTPN] ShadowMoon:
Old report, this has been more than 3 weeks.
Deathie:
--- Quote from: Excalipoor on July 10, 2012, 10:44:57 PM ---I am 78% agree with FPS Russian.
Mostly 37% of VIPs and Regs DID NOT follow the rules.
--- End quote ---
Where the good fuck did you pull those numbers from
Did you like, count each individual person playing or something? ._.
Sabb:
--- Quote from: Excalipoor on August 15, 2012, 08:40:34 PM ---Old report, this has been more than 3 weeks.
--- End quote ---
Just going to put it out there that this shit annoys the hell out of me. I've explained more than enough (and to you I'm certain) that it's quite hard to manage reports or anything as SOURCEBANS IS NOT UP. The servers are, sourcebans aren't. So currently there's still no way for us to ban people without being ingame with them. The reports Snivy has managed today will have to actually be banned later because SB still isn't linked but I don't think Snivy realized that.
But I also just remembered that I have a way of at least demoting him, and checked and he's demoted. I think I demoted him but forgot to lock the thread. That or he simply wasn't reg on the perm servers. so either way, approved I guess. He won't be banned, however.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version