.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) > Discussion
Regarding my position and performance as Admin
Sabb:
--- Quote from: Tezuni on June 01, 2012, 08:45:23 PM ---This should really be locked now.
--- End quote ---
Um not really. There's still plenty of discussion going on. There's no total shit flinging going on yet.
Pryvisee:
You've always been a friend and I have nothing against you. :)
Lets just all share the
Bovicide:
--- Quote from: Sabb on June 01, 2012, 07:55:14 PM ---Lol I'm in no way flaming. I'm just saying that you're uninformed, and are insulting Jman based on your lack of information.
Certainly sounds a lot more like flaming, or at least an attempt to flaming, than this does:
My comment had very little aggression. But, expect to get in return what you dish out.
But any ways... I've agreed that the attacks on Jman are unwarranted, that's what my tl;dr and every other post is saying. Clearly you didn't read much of it. I'm, again, only saying that you've got no right to be calling Jman a "fucking retard" for making this thread, when you're even assuming that the thread is simply based off what people in ab are saying. In reality, it's based off opinions and accusations that people have directly made, in comments, PM's, Steam messages, etc. It's hardly even related to ab.
--- End quote ---
_________________________________________________________
Here's the "I address sabb directly, not the thread" section of bullshit.
Sorry you can't pick up the difference between
--- Quote ---You are a fucking retard for doing this exact retarded thing.
--- End quote ---
--which is a reflection on someones actions, not directly confrontational
and
--- Quote ---Please leave, you don't know what you are talking about.
--- End quote ---
--which is a direct attack on someone's credibility
The presence of a surface insult is far less demeaning than a roundabout request for someone to 'fuck off'. I guess you misconstrue the entire post because I attempt to grab the reader with a real one liner. The nuances of English are subtle for some uninformed people.
Did you pick up on that? That was an insult to your intelligence, yet it is far more confrontational than my original post. I'm sure you agree that the less obvious insult has more impact that way and is thus more hostile.
Anyway(no s), the on topic line.
_________________________________________________________
I'll try to level with you guys, since I'm a little too abusive for more people's tastes:
I think you should've just had a 1 on 1 with those people that Sabb mentions, Jman. Let me clarify.
I'd first like you to notice that I waited to post till the thread was a page in so that my point would be self evident instead of speculative. As I see it, this thread is the corner Jman has gratuitously allocated to fence any insults people would like to make public. Now, do you see any well constructed and based insults? Do you see any valid points of contention? No?
My point is proven. That point being that the (subconscious) purpose of this thread was to address concerns the faceless public has (read AB and otherwise), and THAT IS FUCKING RETARDED, because those posts that lead to this thread were baseless and Jman should've known that. They will only serve to validate those posts.
However, once more I feel the need to reiterate that I have nothing against Jman or his policies, and actively defended him in the AB threads. I just believe that the thread is fully and actually retarded.
That is my opinion on the thread.
[TTPN] ShadowMoon:
--- Quote from: Sanders on June 02, 2012, 01:11:25 AM ---I just believe that the thread is fully and actually retarded.
--- End quote ---
Sabb:
--- Quote from: Sanders on June 02, 2012, 01:11:25 AM ---_________________________________________________________
Here's the "I address sabb directly, not the thread" section of bullshit.
Sorry you can't pick up the difference between --which is a reflection on someones actions, not directly confrontational
and --which is a direct attack on someone's credibility
The presence of a surface insult is far less demeaning than a roundabout request for someone to 'fuck off'. I guess you misconstrue the entire post because I attempt to grab the reader with a real one liner. The nuances of English are subtle for some uninformed people.
Did you pick up on that? That was an insult to your intelligence, yet it is far more confrontational than my original post. I'm sure you agree that the less obvious insult has more impact that way and is thus more hostile.
Anyway(no s), the on topic line.
_________________________________________________________
I'll try to level with you guys, since I'm a little too abusive for more people's tastes:
I think you should've just had a 1 on 1 with those people that Sabb mentions, Jman. Let me clarify.
I'd first like you to notice that I waited to post till the thread was a page in so that my point would be self evident instead of speculative. As I see it, this thread is the corner Jman has gratuitously allocated to fence any insults people would like to make public. Now, do you see any well constructed and based insults? Do you see any valid points of contention? No?
My point is proven. That point being that the (subconscious) purpose of this thread was to address concerns the faceless public has (read AB and otherwise), and THAT IS FUCKING RETARDED, because those posts that lead to this thread were baseless and Jman should've known that. They will only serve to validate those posts.
However, once more I feel the need to reiterate that I have nothing against Jman or his policies, and actively defended him in the AB threads. I just believe that the thread is fully and actually retarded.
That is my opinion on the thread.
--- End quote ---
I disagree. It's to attempt to make people understand that there isn't truly any good reason to be disliking Jman as admin currently and that there is some proof to support that he has been a help and hasn't been a nuisance.
And again, I don't think I'm the only one that your comment is far more aggressive/offensive than mine... idc about the bullshit about it being an attack on your credibility. You simply wouldn't have even gotten the little line of "please, leave" (which I can't fucking believe YOU took offense too, when you, even right now, have your little superior elitist attitude that everyone but you is a fool and such) if you hadn't included YOUR unnecessary insult.
But any ways... this thread isn't about Sander's elitist douchebaggery. I'm not locking the thread yet until it dies out from people simply not posting any more, or turns into all out shit flinging.
I still believe plenty of people have a hate for Jman, and dislike that he's admin with unjustified reason. A lot of it is people solely disliking Jman's personality, but his (poor) traits don't and really haven't, affected Jman's position as an admin and his decisions.
Lately, there's been a cute little survey going around to provide "facts" about whether Jman is overall liked or not as an admin, though only a small portion of people are even being asked. It's solely to cause further conflict between Jman and the community, and is not needed. If the person who's planning to finish and post the "survey" reads this, it would be best that you keep your results to yourself as it's only obviously going to create more conflicts which are in no way needed. The survey helps no one. As well, it will in no way be getting close to resulting in Jman being demoted unless there is actual evidence of abuse or anything of the like, contrary to some belief.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version