Entertainment (Read Only) > Games
New Call Of Duty?
Seb:
--- Quote from: Snivy M.D on May 03, 2012, 10:48:23 AM ---see, most of this focuses on either Europe or North/South America, which they truly aren't a threat to. And also, most nuclear-related posts are from 2009. A lot can change within 3 years.
But think about Asian countries, in particular South Korea.
North Korea has so much artillery ready in place to fire at SKorea, they could literally wipe them off the map within a few minutes. The only reason why they haven't done it is because of the fear of retaliation by other major powers, mainly the US.
You don't need to have nuclear weapons to be dangerous to other countries. Not to mention that Germany, which you said can do serious damage too, doesn't have any nuclear weapons either.
That's not up to debate, it's about the military strength of North Korea, which is one of the strongest armies in existence.
--- End quote ---
They aren't much a threat to South Korea (other than the artillery) either because all their technology is from the 60's. Not to mention they might give the biggest share of their economy to the military, but the North Korean economy is TINY. South Korea gives their military 3x as much.
Don:
--- Quote from: Seb on May 03, 2012, 10:50:43 AM ---They aren't much a threat to South Korea (other than the artillery) either because all their technology is from the 60's. Not to mention they might give the biggest share of their economy to the military, but the North Korean economy is TINY. South Korea gives their military 3x as much.
--- End quote ---
Even if we assume their technology is from the 60s, what makes you think they wouldn't be able to hit South Korea with it anyway?
South Korea has a considerably less advanced and strong military than North Korea, which is why foreign soldiers are stationed at the borders.
semy32:
--- Quote from: Snivy M.D on May 03, 2012, 10:48:23 AM ---You don't need to have nuclear weapons to be dangerous to other countries. Not to mention that Germany, which you said can do serious damage too, doesn't have any nuclear weapons either.
--- End quote ---
About this,
They would have nuclear bombs,but they aren't allowed to...
Seb:
--- Quote from: Snivy M.D on May 03, 2012, 10:52:50 AM ---South Korea has a considerably less advanced and strong military than North Korea, which is why foreign soldiers are stationed at the borders.
--- End quote ---
Dude,
1. South Korea has 3x the military spending
2. Have you seen pictures of the North/South Korean capitals? Seoul looks like Deus Ex HR. Pyongyang looks like Pripyat.
Don:
--- Quote from: semy32(HUN) on May 03, 2012, 10:54:30 AM ---About this,
They would have nuclear bombs,but they aren't allowed to...
--- End quote ---
Well, they're allowed to develop and ship them, but I honestly don't know if they're actually allowed to have any themselves.
--- Quote from: Seb on May 03, 2012, 10:56:38 AM ---Dude,
1. South Korea has 3x the military spending
2. Have you seen pictures of the North/South Korean capitals? Seoul looks like Deus Ex HR. Pyongyang looks like Pripyat.
--- End quote ---
1. Spending =/= Strong military. If the South Korean military was so much superior, why would they ask for foreign assistance to ensure that North Korea doesn't do anything? Seems illogical.
2. Doesn't say anything about either military.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version