.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) > Discussion
[DICUSSION] New VIP Application Process
Deathie:
--- Quote from: Sabb on March 27, 2012, 09:31:30 AM ---It does. For example; I only play TTT as far as these temp servers go. But, I know many players form there. Let's say there's a really good player there that I want VIP, but he only plays TTT. You or Hotgreen (due to <insertreasonhere>) wouldn't actually know how he acts in-game, but maybe he's made a mistake and done something semi-stupid on the forums, therefore you both don't want him promoted. The opinion of the admin who actually PLAYS with that player would in most cases need to be weighed in more.
--- End quote ---
Everyone is voting though.
The admins and VIP's would still give their input in the applications, and explain why they feel the applicant should or shouldn't be approved.
The supposed three people making the final decision are supposed to look at all the responses, and ONLY agree on what the general consensus of the people who gave their opinion on it was. Not their own personal bias or opinion.
Don:
--- Quote from: Sabb on March 27, 2012, 09:31:30 AM ---EDIT:
Not to point fingers here but...Yes, lets put our sole trust into Don or Snivy to make final decisions on who to promote, after promoting both Little Fox and Pheonix in retaliation to Jman's semi-derp. You can see my concerns here.
--- End quote ---
>Not to point fingers here
>proceeds to point fingers
._.
Why even bother bringing that up? Like, it's in no way related to what we're discussing.
Not to mention that he wasn't even saying you should put your sole trust into us.
Sabb:
--- Quote from: Snivy M.D. on March 27, 2012, 09:35:13 AM ---Everyone is voting though.
The admins and VIP's would still give their input in the applications, and explain why they feel the applicant should or shouldn't be approved.
The supposed three people making the final decision are supposed to look at all the responses, and ONLY agree on what the general consensus of the people who gave their opinion on it was. Not their own personal bias or opinion.
--- End quote ---
No I'm not talking about personal bias/opinion there ._.. I'm talking about how everyone was saying that one person would decide in general to promote or not, based on the arguments yet weighing in certain admins' opinions more heavily.
Deathie:
--- Quote from: Sabb on March 27, 2012, 09:37:03 AM ---No I'm not talking about personal bias/opinion there ._.. I'm talking about how everyone was saying that one person would decide in general to promote or not, based on the arguments yet weighing in certain admins' opinions more heavily.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---It does. For example; I only play TTT as far as these temp servers go. But, I know many players form there. Let's say there's a really good player there that I want VIP, but he only plays TTT. You or Hotgreen (due to <insertreasonhere>) wouldn't actually know how he acts in-game, but maybe he's made a mistake and done something semi-stupid on the forums, therefore you both don't want him promoted. The opinion of the admin who actually PLAYS with that player would in most cases need to be weighed in more.
--- End quote ---
You explicitly said "don't want him promoted because he's made a mistake and done something semi-stupid on the forums" which is taking personal bias into account.
It should be, despite our personal feelings towards the person, based on what everyone else has to say. Not what we say.
Sabb:
--- Quote from: Snivy M.D. on March 27, 2012, 09:39:14 AM ---You explicitly said "don't want him promoted because he's made a mistake and done something semi-stupid on the forums" which is taking personal bias into account.
It should be, despite our personal feelings towards the person, based on what everyone else has to say. Not what we say.
--- End quote ---
...No... I mean something like... idk, posting adult content being unaware of the rules or something... or causing issues on the forums resulting in a ban or something, then later becoming better particularly on the servers.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version