.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) > Discussion
[DICUSSION] New VIP Application Process
Deacon:
--- Quote from: Sabb on March 27, 2012, 05:29:06 AM ---No one person should be weighing everyone's votes. And no offense Deacon, but especially not you. Simply because you don't play all the servers ie. TTT, meaning you really wouldn't know who's votes to weigh more in...
--- End quote ---
because I totally don't play. Like yesterday that wasn't me...
But I agree. The old way was a concrete goal, whereas with this there is too much left in one decision
Deathie:
--- Quote from: Sabb on March 27, 2012, 05:29:06 AM ---Simply because you don't play all the servers ie. TTT, meaning you really wouldn't know who's votes to weigh more in...
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: Deacon on March 27, 2012, 07:41:46 AM ---because I totally don't play. Like yesterday that wasn't me...
--- End quote ---
I don't see why activity would be a deciding factor. The person who makes the final call should only work off of the votes of the community, and how actually valuable their input it.
Someone who writes three paragraphs on why someone should be VIP would obviously be counted more than someone who just writes one sentence as to why they shouldn't. Someone whose rather, inactive, would be much less biased when it comes to making the final decision.
Pilgrim:
I like the whole Unbiased person weighing each vote approach, but why cant we have it so there are 3 people doing it, in a judging panel sort of way?
like if 2/3 judges say yes or however we would be measuring them - This way would be much harder to criticise as if any one person is disapproved of by 2 or more respected members, that person surely shouldn't be a VIP.
Deathie:
--- Quote from: Pilgrim on March 27, 2012, 08:34:36 AM ---I like the whole Unbiased person weighing each vote approach, but why cant we have it so there are 3 people doing it, in a judging panel sort of way?
like if 2/3 judges say yes or however we would be measuring them - This way would be much harder to criticise as if any one person is disapproved of by 2 or more respected members, that person surely shouldn't be a VIP.
--- End quote ---
Oh shit.
That's actually a good idea.
It'd be far too difficult to organize something where ALL the admins come to a general consensus,
but if we limit it to the three most active, I think it'd definitely work.
Don:
--- Quote from: Snivy M.D. on March 27, 2012, 08:42:48 AM ---Oh shit.
That's actually a good idea.
It'd be far too difficult to organize something where ALL the admins come to a general consensus,
but if we limit it to the three most active, I think it'd definitely work.
--- End quote ---
Or we could put it to 5.
You know, the number of active admins.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version