Support (Read Only) > Suggestions
TTT Traitor sniper rifle
Shockah:
--- Quote from: gamefreak171 on March 03, 2012, 08:31:44 AM ---Not a single person who's said no has given any argument except for the fact that they think it's overpowered.
--- End quote ---
Figure I can give a few. As for the whole keep damage the same but ability to scavenge ammo idea with the barret it would still be a crap weapon I know personally I would never purchase the thing it's too loud does too little damage is way to conspicuous in general having to crouch to use it and all the gigantic recoil it's just BAD so that would be too U.P. and thus defeat the purpose of adding another weapon in the first place if no one's going to use it for the aforementioned reason. As for increasing the damage to 100 that's ridiculous think of it this way 4 t's 14 innos each T gets a knife kill guaranteed that's -4 innos we're now down to 10 innos now even if this sniper only had one shot at one shot kill thats still another guaranteed kill aka -4 more innos and we're down to 6 innos if only one shot is given still 6 innos remaining and under good circumstance only one or two of the t's revealed the innos get bent over by the remaining t's because though they used their equipment they most likely still have the element of surprise this will happen over and over again however do not fear! I propose a third option certain servers on CSS have it so that only one awp can be given per team well what if we made it so only one barret (which does 2000 damage with only one shot) can be given to a traitor team? Once a traitor has purchased this weapon his T buddies no longer have the option. I have no idea how this could be coded or what would have to be done just food for thought.
Doctor Who:
--- Quote from: Philip Glass on March 03, 2012, 01:19:58 PM ---I say two shots, another shot costs a credit.
Not everybody's going to get one, and there's always that one T who gets killed in the beginning.
--- End quote ---
Of course due to revenge rdm or low karma
Deacon:
You want me to support my statements?
Coolz said he didn't want it.
ursus:
--- Quote from: Deacon on March 04, 2012, 07:35:45 PM ---You want me to support my statements?
Coolz said he didn't want it.
--- End quote ---
see you could have said that the first time
and everything would have been fine
Deacon:
Its not like we haven't talked about this before.
Not me and you specifically, you know what i mean asdf
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version