Support (Read Only) > Suggestions

why can't VIPs see spray names

<< < (6/6)

Eion Kilant 739:

--- Quote from: gamefreak171 on February 28, 2012, 05:05:52 PM ---Plenty of people have their NAMES in their spray. If you're stupid enough to put your spray next to an unidentified body, you have bigger problems than VIP abuse.

Not only that, how do we know someone didn't die when the spray was ALREADY there?

Let's say that I put my spray on the ground. Asshole traitor comes and knifes someone, and drops the body by my spray.

Now, in your scenario, a VIP comes, sees my spray, and obviously knows that I'm traitor.

Now, in real life, an intelligent, well-adjusted human being approaches and sees my spray, and realizes that it DOESN'T MEAN SHIT.

They then proceed to go about their business by identifying the body, and calling the detective to it. Life proceeds as normal.


In case you didn't want to read all that, the basic message is that your third-grade reasoning skills don't validate making my life more difficult because of a lack of trust.

Your spelling, sarcasm, and blunt assertions are appreciated.

--- End quote ---

1. My apologies for the spelling, I didn't bother to run it through microsoft word.
2. I was not being sarcastic.
3. What blunt assertions? Where did I bluntly assert something? At the most I implied it when I said "Exuse me for..." but that was directed at the two people who gave me -1s.
4. While it commonly does end up not meaning anything I was still pointing out a possible exploit. I stated the biggest possible reason I could think up that could cause it to be a bad idea. In no way does that mean that it should not be implemented for that reason!

ursus:

--- Quote from: Eion Kilant 739 on February 28, 2012, 05:49:41 PM ---1. My apologies for the spelling, I didn't bother to run it through microsoft word.
2. I was not being sarcastic.
3. What blunt assertions? Where did I bluntly assert something? At the most I implied it when I said "Exuse me for..." but that was directed at the two people who gave me -1s.
4. While it commonly does end up not meaning anything I was still pointing out a possible exploit. I stated the biggest possible reason I could think up that could cause it to be a bad idea. In no way does that mean that it should not be implemented for that reason!

--- End quote ---

oh okay

well allow me to retort

1. nothing to say here


2. "Exuse me for thinking outside the box and trying to find future problems that could arise from it. "







You said the opposite of what you meant to mock and criticize me.


3. "I was not being sarcastic."


4. Okay.



Anyways, I'm done here. Apologies for rustling up my jimmies.

Prox:
Seriously why isn't this implemented yet?
And about the abuse, VIPs aren't just some random people, they do know what they're doing.

Don:
For reference, this was discussed before:

http://forum.randomgs.com/index.php/topic,3679.0.html

Your best bet is probably to PM Xrain.

Samo:
It's ok. I'm one of those bitches who sprays over everything. I'm on it... sorta.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page