Support (Read Only) > Suggestions
Changes to stronghold...
Tabitha:
Gamefreak, this is a GAME not real life D: people play video games to escape real life -.-
Ἆxule:
--- Quote from: Sabb on January 24, 2012, 06:04:59 AM ---I don't understand? I'm saying that there should be a delay between time placing props added. Such as, after placing 3 or 4 props close to each other you would have to then wait some amount of time before placing more.
--- End quote ---
Sort of like that delay when you're building near an enemy's prop.
maybe use that?
1. I can agree that it gets annoying when people spam props like that, but if you're raiding in a pair, you can hit him from multiple areas. He won't be able to keep forever and will eventually lose.
2. The AWP is also one of the most expensive guns out there. Also, same reasons as Sabb and Gamefreak.
3. I don't think this needs to be changed. What I do is just remove it right after I finish using it, and go back to my raiding. Repeat process.
4. I don't see how it could hurt (as long as they aren't bigger than the biggest prop already)
5. I don't understand why people complain about the map change. I understand it gets annoying when it's the same map, but the majority chooses what map they want to play.
Quick question though, wasn't there like a contract that kept you from making ANY modification to the game?
Tabitha:
--- Quote from: Ἆxule on January 25, 2012, 01:50:41 AM ---Sort of like that delay when you're building near an enemy's prop.
maybe use that?
1. I can agree that it gets annoying when people spam props like that, but if you're raiding in a pair, you can hit him from multiple areas. He won't be able to keep forever and will eventually lose.
2. The AWP is also one of the most expensive guns out there. Also, same reasons as Sabb and Gamefreak.
3. I don't think this needs to be changed. What I do is just remove it right after I finish using it, and go back to my raiding. Repeat process.
4. I don't see how it could hurt (as long as they aren't bigger than the biggest prop already)
5. I don't understand why people complain about the map change. I understand it gets annoying when it's the same map, but the majority chooses what map they want to play.
Quick question though, wasn't there like a contract that kept you from making ANY modification to the game?
--- End quote ---
Dunno about the contract, Ask coolz O-o
1.We tried that but there was like only 1 entrance. And the rest were covered by some other guys.
2.Still even though the awp is expensive it is VERY annoying. (Aimbot+AWP=FFFUUUUUUUUU)
3.Yes I do that too just still, I don't see a problem in being able to have 2?
4.Yeah.
5.Well it is very annoying when everyone chooses the most SMALLEST maps EVER when there's 13 people on >_> then people have to make bases out of props or something.
ursus:
--- Quote from: Tabitha on January 25, 2012, 03:31:22 AM ---(Aimbot+AWP=FFFUUUUUUUUU)
--- End quote ---
Yes, because an aimbotter with a FAMAS is much less threatening.
Sabb:
--- Quote from: Ἆxule on January 25, 2012, 01:50:41 AM ---Sort of like that delay when you're building near an enemy's prop.
maybe use that?
1. I can agree that it gets annoying when people spam props like that, but if you're raiding in a pair, you can hit him from multiple areas. He won't be able to keep forever and will eventually lose.
2. The AWP is also one of the most expensive guns out there. Also, same reasons as Sabb and Gamefreak.
3. I don't think this needs to be changed. What I do is just remove it right after I finish using it, and go back to my raiding. Repeat process.
4. I don't see how it could hurt (as long as they aren't bigger than the biggest prop already)
5. I don't understand why people complain about the map change. I understand it gets annoying when it's the same map, but the majority chooses what map they want to play.
Quick question though, wasn't there like a contract that kept you from making ANY modification to the game?
--- End quote ---
Nop, just can't distribute the modified code or something like that.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version