.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers

Bans (Read Only) => Report => Approved => Topic started by: Ἆxule on October 05, 2011, 03:21:33 AM

Title: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Ἆxule on October 05, 2011, 03:21:33 AM
1. Player's SteamID (STEAM_0:0:1234)
STEAM_0:1:44511758

2. Players Nickname
[L4G]Barkhausen

3. Your in-game name
Axule

4. Server name (Wirebuild, Zombie Survival)
TTT

5. Description of the event(s)
Joined, mentioning stuff about ddos'ing.
Eventually, we began getting these major lags.

6. Reason for ban
DDOS'ing

7. Screenshots or demo(s) | Optional console log(s)
SS1: Players
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
SS2: What?
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
SS3: Pings
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
SS4: Scriptenforcer
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

8. Extra(s)
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: quintosh on October 05, 2011, 03:33:33 AM
Alright ma little friend, I shall state some things here.



"SS2"(as you call it): Is it illegal that I change my quitmessage? I guess no. It requires a whitelisted module and one lua script, that's not hacking.

SS3: What's wrong with adding a fake ping mask? I couldn't see it being forbidden in the motd or elsewhere. It can be caused by a simple console command, which isn't hacking either.

SS4: Some dude was trying to argue with me about hacking in GMOD and my previous screenshots. In my screenshot folder you could have seen me playing on a TTT server that had no scriptenforcer, personally I don't know what has made you upset in that statement. Not every server has scriptenforcer, no matter what mod (except only 1 servers runs it and what not), and the majority of servers actually have no scriptenforcer. At least as far as I could experience it hitherto, I haven't played alot Gmod so far.

That's all I have to say yet.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Ἆxule on October 05, 2011, 03:35:47 AM
Quote from: quintosh on October 05, 2011, 03:33:33 AM
Alright ma little friend, I shall state some things here.



"SS2"(as you call it): Is it illegal that I change my quitmessage? I guess no. It requires a whitelisted module and one lua script, that's not hacking.

SS3: What's wrong with adding a fake ping mask? I couldn't see it being forbidden in the motd or elsewhere. It can be caused by a simple console command, which isn't hacking either.

SS4: Some dude was trying to argue with me about hacking in GMOD and my previous screenshots. In my screenshot folder you could have seen me playing on a TTT server that had no scriptenforcer, personally I don't know what has made you upset in that statement. Not every server has scriptenforcer, no matter what mod (except only 1 servers runs it and what not), and the majority of servers actually have no scriptenforcer. At least as far as I could experience it hitherto, I haven't played alot Gmod so far.

That's all I have to say so far.

I'm not the one to argue or agree. I'm not sure what ddos'ing requires or whatever you were doing (if you were).
Anyways, this is just something. Better than nothing, right?

Quote
SS3: What's wrong with adding a fake ping mask? I couldn't see it being forbidden in the motd or elsewhere. It can be caused by a simple console command, which isn't hacking either.
If you're implying that this wasn't real, then I do disagree on that. It was laggy as hell. No way that was just a mask

Quote
SS4: Some dude was trying to argue with me about hacking in GMOD and my previous screenshots. In my screenshot folder you could have seen me playing on a TTT server that had no scriptenforcer, personally I don't know what has made you upset in that statement. Not every server has scriptenforcer, no matter what mod (except only 1 servers runs it and what not), and the majority of servers actually have no scriptenforcer. At least as far as I could experience it hitherto, I haven't played alot Gmod so far.
Sorry about that, I was afk for a sec and when I came back, I saw you talking about that. I was confused because I thought Coolz had it installed, but I decieded anything will do.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: quintosh on October 05, 2011, 03:40:13 AM
It was. Sadly I can't tell you the command and just ddos the server again so you can see it yourself.
>implying I was ddosing.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Ἆxule on October 05, 2011, 03:43:17 AM
Quote from: quintosh on October 05, 2011, 03:40:13 AM
It was. Sadly I can't tell you the command and just ddos the server again so you can see it yourself.
>implying I was ddosing.

I don't really want to know the command...
but thanks?

and I'd rather not see it again.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Dark Pacifist on October 05, 2011, 06:33:24 AM
fine then there is the fact that your ping stayed around 200 while everyone else was hitting in the 950's and that it started every time when you relogged in.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: quintosh on October 05, 2011, 06:51:01 AM
Quote from: Dark Pacifist on October 05, 2011, 06:33:24 AM
fine then there is the fact that your ping stayed around 200 while everyone else was hitting in the 950's and that it started every time when you relogged in.

didn't i explain the 200 ping......
plus, prologic, i ddos the server and don't lag myself, really.

and i didnt notice it starting everytime i relogged in, however, i had to relog every damn time cause the server forced me to do so. constantly kept printing the server IP and some other bullshit error after it into the console til i left, which is, damn annoying, cause this's happening to me like every 5th minute.

this:

173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow
173.60.104.220:27019:send reliable stream overflow

continues til i quit
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Cathedron on October 05, 2011, 07:30:15 AM
Not only this, he also RDM'ed a few players. Made two of us lose our traitor rounds too.

And yes, I can confirm him DDoSing the server.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: quintosh on October 05, 2011, 08:31:43 AM
Quote from: Sonerin on October 05, 2011, 07:30:15 AM
Not only this, he also RDM'ed a few players. Made two of us lose our traitor rounds too.

And yes, I can confirm him DDoSing the server.

do you have something like proof that I was ddosing? I never said I did.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Kahuna on October 05, 2011, 09:37:24 AM
+1
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Lazer Blade on October 05, 2011, 12:07:54 PM
good job finding this guy ddosing axule +1
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: quintosh on October 05, 2011, 02:29:09 PM
Just to mention, I find this way of valuing quality of a ban request immature. He doesn't even have a legit evidence, and I don't know whether you were there or not, but I assume you weren't. Just because he has a higher rank than I do (reg>guest) shouldn't affect your answer, so please think about it. If I was ddosing, I wouldn't be sitting here that long screaming for a "last chance".
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Alkaline on October 05, 2011, 04:38:26 PM
quintosh...


L4G...


Ah yes!
This comes back to me now!

About three months ago, July or something, three or for L4G guys join the server.
They micspam, threaten ddos, aimbot and wallhack.
When a VIP successfully kicked one, the server got d-dosed in its back port and crashed.
A thread was made about this incident but was later abandoned and binned. (http://forum.randomgs.com/index.php/topic,7511.0.html)

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Dark Pacifist on October 09, 2011, 11:21:48 AM
It's been questioned time and again so it's either you're guilty or someone that was there was setting you up still doesn't explain your rdming micspamming or arguement with your friend about weather or not you were ddosing. Sorry hate to tell you that nobody has had as many issues as when L4G groupies like you were on.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Roach :3 on October 13, 2011, 04:09:10 AM
+1, enough proof for me.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: memo3300 on October 13, 2011, 09:30:09 AM
take a nice look of all the perma bans that only one guy from L4G gets:

http://nonerdsjustgeeks.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=3485 (http://nonerdsjustgeeks.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=3485)

http://sammyservers.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5349 (http://sammyservers.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5349)

http://www.goldenmachinegun.com/bans/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=true&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190 (http://www.goldenmachinegun.com/bans/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=true&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190)

http://www.externalgaming.com/bans/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190&Submit (http://www.externalgaming.com/bans/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190&Submit)

http://www.noxiousnet.com/logs/65_60_53_27_27018/2011_08_17/log001.txt (http://www.noxiousnet.com/logs/65_60_53_27_27018/2011_08_17/log001.txt) <-- noxious heuehuehu

http://sourcebans.lethal-zone.eu/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=false&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190 (http://sourcebans.lethal-zone.eu/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=false&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190)

http://playstuff.net/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190&Submit (http://playstuff.net/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190&Submit)

http://www.pulpfortress.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=true&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190 (http://www.pulpfortress.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=true&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190)

http://nnjg.site.nfoservers.com/sb/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=false&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190 (http://nnjg.site.nfoservers.com/sb/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=false&searchText=STEAM_0:1:36224190)

---there were too many pages on google to link them all .______________.

anyways banhauser allredy got permabanned from 2 other comunities, i think also should.

http://bans.left4green.com/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=true (http://bans.left4green.com/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=true)

http://www.pub-gaming.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=true&searchText=STEAM_0:1:44511758 (http://www.pub-gaming.com/sourcebans/index.php?p=banlist&hideinactive=true&searchText=STEAM_0:1:44511758)




Just ban him already



Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: quintosh on October 13, 2011, 02:50:04 PM
that left4green one was an unjustified ban, and the pubgaming one is from a group community ban


EDIT: why did you edit your post? Also, the other guy isn't me, believe it or not he took my name for a short period. My friends do that for shits and giggles.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Dark Pacifist on October 15, 2011, 08:42:22 AM
The point is that your hanging around trouble makers and if you really didn't ddos then someone targeted and set you up.

Alright memo I didn't notice those last two were just on him.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: memo3300 on October 15, 2011, 08:45:42 AM
Quote from: Dark Pacifist on October 15, 2011, 08:42:22 AM
The point is that your hanging around trouble makers and if you really didn't ddos then someone targeted and set you up. I personaly don't care anymore an haven't seen such issues when you were on the past couple times so consider yourself lucky  :thumbsdown: If you make me regret this I'll make you sorry.

what?

Ya lets not ban a guy who got permabanned from two other communities and we suspect he DDOSed us...  sounds fine to you?

anyways for me you should just let it up to an admin dark.
Title: Re: [L4G]Barkhausen- ddos'ing
Post by: Xrain on November 08, 2011, 03:16:49 AM
We have an absolute zero tolerance policy in place in regards to Denial of Service attacks on  our servers, as such you have been suspected of it on two different occasions. If it really isn't you it's certainly possible for it to be someone related to your group.

Being unable to make a distinction whether it is you or someone in your group I am going to take the safe route and just do a permanent ban.


If it truly isn't you, speak with coolzeldad, this is a matter for his hands as I have no way of helping you back up your case.