.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers

.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers (Read Only) => Discussion => Topic started by: Nel on August 16, 2010, 07:24:15 PM

Title: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Nel on August 16, 2010, 07:24:15 PM
Hi everybody.
I want to clear a doubt I (and lots of players) have about what it is commonly called RDM. My doubt is:

Let's suppose a player, called A is walking with his weapons holstered to a random location, then player B comes out from behind and shots player A, but A manages to defend himself and kills B.

My doubt is, Is what A did considered Rdm?
If not, who rdmed in that situation?

I think that B is the rdmer because he shot A out of nowhere, although B didnt managed to kill A.
Hope you understand what I say.
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Jman on August 16, 2010, 07:34:38 PM
i agree with player b as being the rdmer. who IS in doubt besides you lol?
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Nel on August 16, 2010, 08:11:42 PM
xD No i just asked help here because i want to clear all doubts about this, and avoid seeing fools who don't know the rules say that B is not the rdmer, so if more people agree that B is the rdmer i will be fine.
Still though, i would like to see what an admin says about this. :book:
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Jman on August 16, 2010, 09:40:04 PM
k lol  :gtfo:
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Bovicide on August 16, 2010, 09:58:28 PM
In my opinion neither "RDMed" because player A killed B in self defence and player B failed to kill player A. Therefore Player A's actions were not random, and player B's actions did not lead to the death of player A.

In any case, the standard is 6 innocentA v innocentB,C,D,E,F,G kills before ban or kick is to be mentioned. Therefore, Player A would need to kill 5 more innocents to at least qualify, or player B would need to have killed 6 innocents before he was killed.
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Jman on August 16, 2010, 10:00:31 PM
In my opinion neither "RDMed" because player A killed B in self defence and player B failed to kill player A. Therefore Player A's actions were not random, and player B's actions did not lead to the death of player A.

In any case, the standard is 6 innocentA v innocentB,C,D,E,F,G kills before ban or kick is to be mentioned. Therefore, Player A would need to kill 5 more innocents to at least qualify, or player B would need to have killed 6 innocents before he was killed.

i agree mostly except for the fact that Player B attacked Player A, but lost = fail rdm, but still an attempt which counts for something?
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Bovicide on August 16, 2010, 10:06:44 PM
Well you cant yell at someone for RDMing you when they failed to kill you. You can rage because they went full retard and shot you, but that's on their karma.

Yes i know it affects your karma, but if you managed to pwn them when they surprise attacked you, I don't think you need to be worried about them.
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: UberLord on August 16, 2010, 10:12:24 PM
If they failed to kill you odds are they had low karma=not much karma lost.
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Waffle on August 16, 2010, 10:24:32 PM
One thing that irks me on TTT is that even if you retard attacks you first and you kill them, you still lose 300-400 karma instead of like 400-500. It's REALLY irritating.
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Osme on August 17, 2010, 01:29:59 AM
yea it should be changed, if he hits you, u lose no karma

if some fag join and immediately makes a really obvious rdm (u walk down hallway, shotgun to skull) ill kick for 2. 6 people seems a little much, and sanders, STOP CHANGING IT
4, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6
ur rules give me headache
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Jman on August 17, 2010, 09:47:56 AM
6 people seems a little much, and sanders, STOP CHANGING IT
4, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6
ur rules give me headache


THIS X over 9000
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Nel on August 17, 2010, 12:15:36 PM
In my opinion neither "RDMed" because player A killed B in self defence and player B failed to kill player A. Therefore Player A's actions were not random, and player B's actions did not lead to the death of player A.

In any case, the standard is 6 innocentA v innocentB,C,D,E,F,G kills before ban or kick is to be mentioned. Therefore, Player A would need to kill 5 more innocents to at least qualify, or player B would need to have killed 6 innocents before he was killed.

But I don't see any fairness in letting you, me or whoever the attacked is to be killed by a player who attacks you for no reason. Maybe he is having fun by doing it, but he is messing with other player's enjoyment of the game. Unless you consider it funny to kill somebody who attacks you and you think "He is T no doubt" and you go and check him, he is Innocent, and even more you lose more karma than him ???

Also I have another doubt: Are the Rdm kills accumulative? I think they should be because I have seen the following issue happening in game:

ROUND 1:
Player A rdms player B and player C, player B was Innocent and C was Traitor. Nothing happens to him because he rdmed 2 players only.

ROUND 2:
Player A rdms Player B and D, both Innocents. Nothing happens to him because he rdmed 2 players.

ROUND 3:
Player A rdms Player B and D, both T. Nothing happens to him

FINAL ROUND:
Player A rdms Players B,C,D,E,F and nothing happens to him because, as some say "Final round is rdm round"


So in short, some smart people do a lot of rdm in one certain map, but without surpassing the limit of 3 rdms per round.
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Jman on August 17, 2010, 12:29:04 PM

So in short, some smart people do a lot of rdm in one certain map, but without surpassing the limit of 3 rdms per round.

may not be bannable, but it is a major dick move imo :(
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: tomfoolery on August 17, 2010, 08:40:10 PM
yea it should be changed, if he hits you, u lose no karma

if some fag join and immediately makes a really obvious rdm (u walk down hallway, shotgun to skull) ill kick for 2. 6 people seems a little much, and sanders, STOP CHANGING IT
4, 5, 4, 6, 4, 6
ur rules give me headache

You'll kick for 2?

uhhhh...
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Jman on August 17, 2010, 08:52:04 PM
lol
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Osme on August 17, 2010, 08:57:07 PM
You'll kick for 2?

uhhhh...

when its someone i KNOW who is always and rdmer, and he jsut walks up toi be with a shotgun (or some1 else) yea. basicly.
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Jman on August 17, 2010, 09:06:09 PM
when its someone i KNOW who is always and rdmer, and he jsut walks up toi be with a shotgun (or some1 else) yea. basicly.


lrn2spell/spellcheck.

when its some i know who is always and rdmer, he jsut walks up toi be with a shotgun (or sum1 else) yea. basicly
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Osme on August 17, 2010, 09:06:50 PM

lrn2spell/spellcheck.

when its some i know who is always and rdmer, he jsut walks up toi be with a shotgun (or sum1 else) yea. basicly

lrn2accept
damn nazi :L
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Jman on August 17, 2010, 09:09:30 PM
lrn2accept
damn nazi :L


lol nazi? its funny cuz i am JEWISH. U FAIL. Kthxbai.  :gtfo:
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Osme on August 17, 2010, 09:30:18 PM

lol nazi? its funny cuz i am JEWISH. U FAIL. Kthxbai.  :gtfo:
XD
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: fenkeN on August 17, 2010, 11:30:13 PM

lol nazi? its funny cuz i am JEWISH. U FAIL. Kthxbai.  :gtfo:

How do you get 100 jews into a car?
Throw a quarter in it.
How do you get them out again?
Tell them Hilter is driving.
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: » Magic « on August 18, 2010, 05:03:22 AM
How do you get 100 jews into a car?
Throw a quarter in it.
How do you get them out again?
Tell them Hilter is driving.


LOOOLLOLOLOLOLO
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Jman on August 18, 2010, 06:07:32 AM
:( nazi
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Osme on August 18, 2010, 01:17:17 PM
:( nazi

religion on the internet is funny xD
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Mr. Franklin on August 18, 2010, 03:50:22 PM
How do you get 100 jews into a car?
Throw a quarter in it.
How do you get them out again?
Tell them Hilter is driving.


lulz... :thumbsup:
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Peetah on August 19, 2010, 07:42:22 AM
lol makes sence.
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: Waffle on August 19, 2010, 09:13:36 AM
lol makes sence.
sense*
:V.....
Title: Re: [Trouble in Terrorist Town] Just a doubt.
Post by: ledjohnny on August 20, 2010, 07:43:52 AM
What kinda gas does hitler's car take? Jew.

What's the difference between a pizza and a Jew? The pizza doesn't screen in the oven.

Why did hitler commit suicide? He got his gas bill.

I am not a Nazi.