.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers

Bans (Read Only) => Appeal => Unapproved => Topic started by: Loke on December 15, 2012, 01:09:39 PM

Title: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Loke on December 15, 2012, 01:09:39 PM
1. Player's SteamID: Unneded

2. Players Nickname: Loke

3. Your in-game name: evilloker

4. Server name: Minecraft Vanilla

5. Description of the event(s): Well, I was banned for accusations of "orehack" in Minecraft. I had argued with Deacon, and he had told me to make a report because he told me that there was some proof. Whoever has the "proof" Please present it.

6. Reason for appeal Was not hacking.
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Deacon on December 15, 2012, 01:38:37 PM
asshole.
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Loke on December 15, 2012, 02:02:08 PM
Quote from: Deacon on December 15, 2012, 01:38:37 PM
1: http://filesmelt.com/dl/Loke_Appeal.png (http://filesmelt.com/dl/Loke_Appeal.png)

2: Admitted to hacking in the past. Admitted full well to using Rei's minimap, which is a violation of Global Rule #2. (http://filesmelt.com/dl/Loke_Appeal.png)

3: Coolz has the proof and it is at his discretion to release publicly.

The thing is that nobody has told me Rei's wasn't allowed. Snivy was even talking about how he apporves of it so it was pretty obvious to me.
And yes, I have hacked in the past, but this is the present. The past doesn't have anything to do with this.
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Sabb on December 15, 2012, 02:19:30 PM
I'm confused. Is there more proof?
Because I thought me and coolz had agreed that minimaps were fine as long as they don't show anything, which the one he's using doesn't. It only shows the surface. It does show where mobs are but that shouldn't be a big deal, and it doesn't show where diamonds and such are so...
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Deacon on December 15, 2012, 02:21:57 PM
Not my ban. Can't help you.

Also, not to sound like a dick, but this isn't Snivy's server.
Global rules apply.

Sabb, I don't know if this was the reason, but it is one of mine. I don't see why we should allow untraceable clientside hacks/scripts that give people an unfair advantage. Of any kind. And Rei's has entity tracking, to include other players, which I've experienced exploited firsthand. It has cavemapping, to let you know where you're digging. It shouldn't be a problem, but these untraceable little features spoil it entirely.
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Loke on December 15, 2012, 02:37:42 PM
Quote from: Deacon on December 15, 2012, 02:21:57 PM
Not my ban. Can't help you.

Also, not to sound like a dick, but this isn't Snivy's server.
Global rules apply.

Sabb, I don't know if this was the reason, but it is one of mine. I don't see why we should allow untraceable clientside hacks/scripts that give people an unfair advantage. Of any kind. And Rei's has entity tracking, to include other players, which I've experienced exploited firsthand. It has cavemapping, to let you know where you're digging. It shouldn't be a problem, but these untraceable little features spoil it entirely.

Surprise; I have no idea how to do any of those things. I don't use the minimap anyways. I only use the waypoints.
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Deathie on December 15, 2012, 05:31:27 PM
Quote from: Deacon on December 15, 2012, 01:38:37 PM
2: Admitted to hacking in the past. Admitted full well to using Rei's minimap, which is a violation of Global Rule #2.

I use Rei's minimap too though.

Might as well ban me too then, if that's really supposed to be a valid reason.

If you're going to judge it based on the fact that it can be modded for exploitation, you'd might as well be banning anyone using a custom minecraft client since those can be modded to have speedhacks, ESP's, and invincibility.

It'd be like banning someone for using spout. It can be modded for hacks, but people could also just be using it becuase it's a really optimized minecraft client.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Anyways, I want to see what the actual proof against his ban is.

I'm not really fighting for his re-whitelist or appeal, don't forget he was one of my original targets when I started playing on the server, but I haven't seen anything to really warrant it either. Iunno.

I mean, sure he's a little annoying, but I haven't seen him actually /do/ anything wrong yet.
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Deacon on December 15, 2012, 06:35:31 PM
Let me clarify, those are my opinions, not the actual reasons.

Again, Coolz handled his ban personally, with help from a few anonymous people, and asked me to be there because I'm the only active admin in MC.

Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Sabb on December 15, 2012, 06:36:18 PM
Quote from: Deacon on December 15, 2012, 06:35:31 PM
Let me clarify, those are my opinions, not the actual reasons.

Again, Coolz handled his ban personally, with help from a few anonymous people, and asked me to be there because I'm the only active admin in MC.
only
active admin
ok   :(
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Deacon on December 15, 2012, 06:46:08 PM
Quote from: Sabb on December 15, 2012, 06:36:18 PM
only
active admin
ok   :(

...

how much admin'ing have you done on the server?
not trying to sound like a dick or whatever but
i take care...of stuff...

I'll shut up.
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Sabb on December 15, 2012, 07:10:43 PM
Quote from: Deacon on December 15, 2012, 06:46:08 PM
...

how much admin'ing have you done on the server?
not trying to sound like a dick or whatever but
i take care...of stuff...

I'll shut up.
Well there's no banning or anything so this isn't too much we can actually do. I know you're more active in what goes on and shit cause you're on ts more and talking but I wouldn't say you're the only active admin. I do shit where I can lol.
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Deacon on December 15, 2012, 07:16:16 PM
Quote from: Sabb on December 15, 2012, 07:10:43 PM
Well there's no banning or anything so this isn't too much we can actually do. I know you're more active in what goes on and shit cause you're on ts more and talking but I wouldn't say you're the only active admin. I do shit where I can lol.

/ban
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Prox on December 16, 2012, 02:11:19 AM
I think that coolz should provide proof or w.e. that got Loke banned because I simply don't see why it should be hidden away from him, it would also make this whole thing more clear for everyone.
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: Loke on December 16, 2012, 04:42:10 PM
So can we have the proof please?
Title: Re: Loke's MC appeal.
Post by: coolzeldad on December 16, 2012, 05:06:57 PM
Well the proof was provided as long as it stays anonymous.

However this was the final piece to convince me and a few other admins on what's going on.

It is obvious when you see it and the past evidence reaffirms suspicions.