.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers

Bans (Read Only) => Report => Unapproved => Topic started by: Dale Feles on October 03, 2012, 04:01:21 PM

Title: (first blood rdm) Fighter494
Post by: Dale Feles on October 03, 2012, 04:01:21 PM
1. Player's SteamID: STEAM_0:1:43119951

2. Players Nickname: Fighter494

3. Your in-game name: Dale Feles

4. Server name: TTT (Trouble in terrorist town)

5. Description of the event(s): Fighter494 first blood rdmed pAULthemaniac (who was afk) and then shortly  left after.

6. Reason for ban : first blood rdm'ing + leave

7. Screenshots or demo(s) | Optional console log(s):
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Sorry for the lack of proof. I did not have much time to gather information.
Title: Re: (target rdm) Fighter494
Post by: Dark Pacifist on October 03, 2012, 04:14:15 PM
I understand that paul has a few vendetta's against him for his random callouts but the Fighter sought him out, killed him, and left after he got killed... so yeah... not sure if guy derped or if it was out of anger since he actually played the game after rdming...
Title: Re: (target rdm) Fighter494
Post by: Dale Feles on October 03, 2012, 06:39:54 PM
Woops my bad, accidentally named thread target rdm, not first blood rdm. Changing so now. Sorry if this caused confusion.
Title: Re: (first blood rdm) Fighter494
Post by: ·UηİŦ·· on October 03, 2012, 07:27:27 PM
Wasn't there... though now as Dark suggests (and since I wasn't there myself/haven't seen paul or fighter in action) I now can't tell if
Quote from: Dark Pacifist on October 03, 2012, 04:14:15 PM
paul has a few vendetta's against him for his random callouts

Fighter sought him out, killed him, and left after he got killed...

or if

Quote from: Dark Pacifist on October 03, 2012, 04:14:15 PM
if guy derped

Which may mean he didn't kill Paul out of spite and went "Fuck this look at my karma now kbai".

But, that seems less likely, if he ragequit after still playing reinforces the whole "Paul likes to call random people out too much so I'll be Batman" thing.

If he qq'd in the first place.

But I trust your judgement. +1.
Title: Re: (first blood rdm) Fighter494
Post by: Deacon on October 04, 2012, 05:54:08 PM
1 mo., intentional firstbornblood
Title: Re: (first blood rdm) Fighter494
Post by: Xrain on October 24, 2012, 01:09:26 PM
Not sufficient reason for a ban.