.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers
Bans (Read Only) => Report => Unapproved => Topic started by: Pilot on August 06, 2012, 10:10:07 PM
-
1. Player's SteamID (STEAM_0:0:1234)
AdolfHipster: STEAM_0:0:40760508
zzoop: STEAM_0:0:52534037
2. Players Nickname
AdolfHipster
zzoop
3. Your in-game name
Pilot
CameIMilk (sent me the heads up)
4. Server name (Wirebuild, Zombie Survival)
Trouble in Terrorist Town
5. Description of the event(s)
I left the server to go make a ban request for a T-hacker. My friend, CameIMilk, sent me a message that he was pointed out by zzoop for no reason. CameIMilk was a traitor.
I checked zzoop's friend list and found AdolfHipster, who I recognized from the game I was just in. I asked CameIMilk if Adolf was one of his t-buddies. He responded yes.
Though this contradicts what I said in another ban request regarding ghosting, this evidence alone is enough to be very suspicious. I would consider CameIMilk a reliable source too, considering he's relatively new to the gamemode and has no reason to make false accusations.
6. Reason for ban
Ghosting
7. Screenshots or demo(s) | Optional console log(s)
(http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc152/Copkid2/zzoopghosting.jpg)
-
Is that your only proof?
-
Is that your only proof?
No. I have also seen these two ghosting.
-Witness
-
When I ask if that's the only proof, I mean is the only proof you have of the two ghosting just hear say from other people?
Coolz and the admins are very strict on actual proof such as consistent damagelogs, pics of friends list, etc etc.
-
Unfortunately this is my only hard evidence on these two ghosting. Hopefully more people see these two in-game and contribute more hard evidence to this report, if they are in-fact ghosting.
-
Unfortunately this is my only hard evidence on these two ghosting. Hopefully more people see these two in-game and contribute more hard evidence to this report, if they are in-fact ghosting.
If that's the case, then make a new report with the new evidence and reference this thread.
For now, I'm locking this one due to lack of evidence.