Yeah, the spraying over system doesn't work always. I just got lucky here.spraying over sprays really should be bannable
spraying over sprays really should be bannable(http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/523779495820511172/284155BA26D1024E10EF3932FE4B135ADF0583AD/)Spoiler (click to show/hide)
spraying over sprays really should be bannableFUCK YOU.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
FUCK YOU.umad purple?
coolz said in the past porn sprays are not bannable. unless they are illegal themselves in nature.
Or if "they're deemed a problem".
Yes please.oh my god are you serious?
There's a lot of fucked up sprays that I've seen. (Including young children).
Yes please.
There's a lot of fucked up sprays that I've seen. (Including young children).
Wait, children HAVING or IN the spray?
coolz said in the past porn sprays are not bannable. unless they are illegal themselves in nature.
If you see stupid sprays, ask an admin to check who made it ._.
The only one that ever did that was gamefreak so far and that was a long ass time ago.
Like nude children sprays. Which is illegal. Never found the person who sprayed the image and I think whoever it was changed it since I've never seen it on our servers.I believe that was Kirhi's spray.
I believe that was Kirhi's spray.
Anyway if someone want's to know who sprayed what in TTT I'll spec and find out for them so long as it dosen't become a witch hunt.Spoiler (click to show/hide)
>Doesn't want it to become a witch hunt.Honestly, who is stupid enough to spray their spray on or near the guy they just killed.
>Blamed someone for doing something in a way that isn't stating a fact.
Well the problem with this is that it can happen at any time and be resprayed somewhere else at anytime. The only big reason VIPs shouldn't have it is because of abuse. When they see a spray next to an unidentified body they can just check the spray and have a good idea of who the killer was.
Honestly, who is stupid enough to spray their spray on or near the guy they just killed.
>Doesn't want it to become a witch hunt.
>Blamed someone for doing something in a way that isn't stating a fact.
Well the problem with this is that it can happen at any time and be resprayed somewhere else at anytime. The only big reason VIPs shouldn't have it is because of abuse. When they see a spray next to an unidentified body they can just check the spray and have a good idea of who the killer was.
It's pretty common, from what I've seen. About 22% of the time I get killed the killer sprays his spray (only counting the times my body was hidden in any way).
Regardless, VIPs should still be able to see who sprayed a spray. Exuse me for thinking outside the box and trying to find future problems that could arise from it.
Plenty of people have their NAMES in their spray. If you're stupid enough to put your spray next to an unidentified body, you have bigger problems than VIP abuse.
Not only that, how do we know someone didn't die when the spray was ALREADY there?
Let's say that I put my spray on the ground. Asshole traitor comes and knifes someone, and drops the body by my spray.
Now, in your scenario, a VIP comes, sees my spray, and obviously knows that I'm traitor.
Now, in real life, an intelligent, well-adjusted human being approaches and sees my spray, and realizes that it DOESN'T MEAN SHIT.
They then proceed to go about their business by identifying the body, and calling the detective to it. Life proceeds as normal.
In case you didn't want to read all that, the basic message is that your third-grade reasoning skills don't validate making my life more difficult because of a lack of trust.
Your spelling, sarcasm, and blunt assertions are appreciated.
1. My apologies for the spelling, I didn't bother to run it through microsoft word.
2. I was not being sarcastic.
3. What blunt assertions? Where did I bluntly assert something? At the most I implied it when I said "Exuse me for..." but that was directed at the two people who gave me -1s.
4. While it commonly does end up not meaning anything I was still pointing out a possible exploit. I stated the biggest possible reason I could think up that could cause it to be a bad idea. In no way does that mean that it should not be implemented for that reason!