.:`=-~rANdOm~`-=:. Game Servers

Support (Read Only) => Suggestions => Topic started by: Tomcat on January 31, 2012, 07:32:08 PM

Title: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Tomcat on January 31, 2012, 07:32:08 PM
In case you haven't noticed... Its been released

http://www.noxiousnet.com/forums/index.php?topic=15456.0 (http://www.noxiousnet.com/forums/index.php?topic=15456.0)

Yes or No?
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Sabb on January 31, 2012, 07:36:59 PM
I personally would really like it. I played on that version I believe and it was a load of fun, but I know a lot of regular ZS players are against it.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: hotdog on January 31, 2012, 07:38:05 PM
i think a trial run would be a must followed by votes if this gets some hits.

but so far im  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Deathie on January 31, 2012, 07:39:23 PM
Yes, if we do what Sabb suggested.

I wouldn't have a problem trying it out, and if a lot of people are against it, we can always go back.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Juan_Ambriz on January 31, 2012, 07:49:30 PM
OMG WE
MUST
TRY
DIS
SHIT
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Mr. Franklin on January 31, 2012, 08:59:38 PM
We should try it for a short time to see if anyone in rNd would like it compared to regular ZS.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Lavenchie on January 31, 2012, 09:02:10 PM
Yes, if we do what Sabb suggested.

I wouldn't have a problem trying it out, and if a lot of people are against it, we can always go back.

This.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Juan_Ambriz on January 31, 2012, 09:11:07 PM
The only thing i have a problem with is like choosing guns, other than actually Randomizing, becuase its fun too see people go like "AWWW SHIT IM FUCKED I GOT NADES OTHER THAN A CADE KIT FUUUUUUUUUUUUU"
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Prox on January 31, 2012, 10:26:33 PM
It would be really nice to have a brand new version of Zs. At least for some sort of time.
I say yes.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Deacon on January 31, 2012, 10:42:56 PM
Yes: Map testing, the overhaul I've been asking for, the ability (and permission) from his royal highness jetboom to modify as we please?

Fuck yes.

Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Samo on February 01, 2012, 02:48:29 AM
I'd love to test this out. Count me in.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: TehHank on February 01, 2012, 03:18:32 AM
Want...so...fucking...much
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Dale Feles on February 01, 2012, 03:55:20 AM
Yes. This would get me playing ZS again.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Mehis on February 01, 2012, 05:08:47 AM
Hell yes! This'll make ZS more interesting...
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: [Valor]iPounce on February 01, 2012, 05:22:58 AM
Yes. This would get me playing ZS again.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: DrOctagonnapus on February 01, 2012, 06:05:19 AM
I say load it up on the rotation server and see how it goes from there.

But IMO I would love to see a newer version of ZS... Tweeked a little bit OFC :D
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Kamikaze on February 01, 2012, 11:35:56 AM
Would this involve buying and selling points and crap? I'd rather have it simple, there's always Noxiousnet you can go and play on. I've decided to come back just because this was more simple and fun.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: WarEclipse™ on February 01, 2012, 01:31:49 PM
Yeah, more like what Kamikaze said, but personally i'd rather play (a newer version) zs on rNd rather than over at NoxiousNet.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Tomcat on February 02, 2012, 07:41:14 PM
Would this involve buying and selling points and crap? I'd rather have it simple, there's always Noxiousnet you can go and play on. I've decided to come back just because this was more simple and fun.

not at alll

but this is a low priority now..
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Seb on February 02, 2012, 08:15:26 PM
Yes.

Hold a poll after a week or two.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: ○ Μαρία ○ on February 03, 2012, 12:52:43 AM
I think trying it out sounds like a good idea. Who knows? People might come to like it better then original ZS.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Kamikaze on February 03, 2012, 06:55:40 AM
I say we do it considering we only have like 6 days left of rNd Zombie Survival left.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: memo3300 on February 03, 2012, 08:19:14 AM
I think that by  the time coolz read this we wont really have time to enjoy the new zs if coolz even do it
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Deacon on February 03, 2012, 08:46:41 AM
Simple. Find someone willing to host the old and the new versions.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: ursus on February 03, 2012, 08:50:54 AM
Yes. This would get me playing ZS again.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Deathie on February 03, 2012, 09:19:15 AM
Simple. Find someone willing to host the old and the new versions.

I should just take down minecraft so I can host all four of my CPU's.

._.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Deacon on February 03, 2012, 09:19:58 AM
I should just take down minecraft so I can host all four of my CPU's.

._.

connection can't handle that.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Deathie on February 03, 2012, 09:21:38 AM
connection can't handle that.


> 1Gbps

Pretty sure I can handle it.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Deacon on February 03, 2012, 09:23:11 AM
> 1Gbps

Pretty sure I can handle it.

Perhaps thats just minecraft being shitty then
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Deathie on February 03, 2012, 09:25:44 AM
Perhaps thats just minecraft being shitty then

It was just java that hated me. Heh.

I was joking anyways. I'll stick to just running one or two since that'd maybe all I can manage myself. .-.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: ○ Μαρία ○ on February 03, 2012, 10:11:37 AM
It was just java that hated me. Heh.

I was joking anyways. I'll stick to just running one or two since that'd maybe all I can manage myself. .-.
If you decide to host two, pick the two that people play the most on a daily basis (though all the servers get played a lot)
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Deathie on February 03, 2012, 10:15:07 AM
If you decide to host two, pick the two that people play the most on a daily basis (though all the servers get played a lot)

Yeah. We already prioritized which servers are more important, and which we should try to get up first.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: memo3300 on February 03, 2012, 10:24:51 AM
try to get a flood with ropes and wheels
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: Kamikaze on February 03, 2012, 11:23:08 AM
Yeah. We already prioritized which servers are more important, and which we should try to get up first.
Would  you mind putting like a list of which you decided to get up?
Personally I imagine 1. TTT 2. ZS, those are my prioritized servers. Of course it's obviously up to you, I mean wirebuild would be great.
Title: Re: Should we host the newer ZS?
Post by: DrOctagonnapus on February 06, 2012, 08:36:53 AM
Agreed .. TT And ZS are really the heavy hitters.